What's new

HAL Tejas | Updates, News & Discussions

Status
Not open for further replies.
LSP-1 have been sitting quiet for over 2 months.

On page 414 (of this thread), LSP-1 had 74 flights on 04-May-12 and it's still the same.

Secondly, they seem to be stop using the planes after 250 to 350 flights (at an average of 30 mins per flight, it would be between 125 to 175 hours of flying time).

What are the plans for TD-1, TD-2 and PV-1, PV-2 and PV-3 now .... their engines would still have a life of 4000 hours (before need to engine overhaul). Are they upgrading those to sqaudron service?
 
don't know if this was posted earlier but an interesting development:

Stealth version of India's Light Combat Aircraft [LCA] Tejas, Mk. 3 on the cards

India's indigenously developed supersonic fighter aircraft to be developed into a stealth platform.

Dr. V.K Saraswat, presently the Scientific Advisor to India's Defence Minister, delivered a keynote address at the recently held Aerospace Forum in Sweden that concluded on the 3rd of June, this year. Titled, 'Vision for India’s Future Aerospace and Defence', he spoke of some of big ticket Aerospace development projects currently underway or are to commence shortly.

Among these would be a programme to integrate technologies developed as part of India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft [AMCA] programme into the Light Combat Aircraft [LCA], Tejas. This variant would be identified as Mark III.

"Many of these technologies could also find their way into the Light Combat Aircraft Mk. 3 that is to be more stealthy than the current Mk. 2 version, which is due to fly in the next two years with the General Electric F414 engine and be ready for operational trials in 2016. The Mk. 3 is to have up to 70% composite content, almost double the current version's level, and could be powered by India's Kaveri turbofan, if that troubled program gets back on track."

Considering this aircraft was not developed from the outset to be stealthy, the final outcome of this particular venture would, therefore, be more of having improved the aircraft to exhibit greater reduction in its Radar Cross-Section [RCS] than its previous iterations [Mk. I & II]. Having a small-sized airframe [smallest for its class], inherently gives it a fair degree of that advantage even now. Add to it reduced metallic surfaces by replacing it with increased composites, and you should have a fine aircraft whose chances of detection on the radar would be that much closer to those aircraft, bigger in size, that are touted as truly stealth fighters. For an aircraft that is not to be the frontline fighter of the Indian Air Force, this development should be a welcome gain.

The Defence Research & Development Organisation [DRDO], on the back of its present Airborne Early Warning & Control System [AEW&CS] development programme, that now appears to be looking up, is to initiate a program to build a more powerful platform capable of detecting fifth generation stealth aircraft & unmanned flying systems. This project gains significance in light of development of fifth generation fighters in the neighbourhood, that should likely enter service by the end of this decade, along with increasing adoption of unmanned aerial systems by armed forces the world over.

At the same time, the country is exploring ways to better detect stealth aircraft. Detecting low-observable aircraft is a key element of the Indian 2020 airborne early warning and control development effort, a program likely to start in late 2014. It will be based on a yet-to-be selected widebody. This initiative follows the current Embraer EMB-145-based airborne early warning program featuring an Indian-developed, 240-deg field-of-view radar. The first of the modified regional jets is due for delivery to India in August, with radar integration to start in October.

The new system will feature a rotodome radar and be integrated with unmanned aircraft and aerostats to allow bi-static radar operations to detect stealth aircraft, says Vijay Kumar Saraswat, scientific adviser to the director general of the Indian Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO). The distributed transmitter and receiver approach should also aid in detecting small targets, such as unmanned aircraft, and provide extended-range detection, Saraswat recently told the Aerospace Forum Sweden 2012.

Dr. Saraswat's talk has been summarised in an article that appears in the latest issue of the Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine. You could read the full article below.

1-84ba704d65.jpg


Stealth version of India's Light Combat Aircraft [LCA] Tejas, Mk. 3 on the cards - AA Me, IN
 
don't know if this was posted earlier but an interesting development:

Stealth version of India's Light Combat Aircraft [LCA] Tejas, Mk. 3 on the cards

India's indigenously developed supersonic fighter aircraft to be developed into a stealth platform.

Dr. V.K Saraswat, presently the Scientific Advisor to India's Defence Minister, delivered a keynote address at the recently held Aerospace Forum in Sweden that concluded on the 3rd of June, this year. Titled, 'Vision for India’s Future Aerospace and Defence', he spoke of some of big ticket Aerospace development projects currently underway or are to commence shortly.

Among these would be a programme to integrate technologies developed as part of India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft [AMCA] programme into the Light Combat Aircraft [LCA], Tejas. This variant would be identified as Mark III.

"Many of these technologies could also find their way into the Light Combat Aircraft Mk. 3 that is to be more stealthy than the current Mk. 2 version, which is due to fly in the next two years with the General Electric F414 engine and be ready for operational trials in 2016. The Mk. 3 is to have up to 70% composite content, almost double the current version's level, and could be powered by India's Kaveri turbofan, if that troubled program gets back on track."

Considering this aircraft was not developed from the outset to be stealthy, the final outcome of this particular venture would, therefore, be more of having improved the aircraft to exhibit greater reduction in its Radar Cross-Section [RCS] than its previous iterations [Mk. I & II]. Having a small-sized airframe [smallest for its class], inherently gives it a fair degree of that advantage even now. Add to it reduced metallic surfaces by replacing it with increased composites, and you should have a fine aircraft whose chances of detection on the radar would be that much closer to those aircraft, bigger in size, that are touted as truly stealth fighters. For an aircraft that is not to be the frontline fighter of the Indian Air Force, this development should be a welcome gain.

The Defence Research & Development Organisation [DRDO], on the back of its present Airborne Early Warning & Control System [AEW&CS] development programme, that now appears to be looking up, is to initiate a program to build a more powerful platform capable of detecting fifth generation stealth aircraft & unmanned flying systems. This project gains significance in light of development of fifth generation fighters in the neighbourhood, that should likely enter service by the end of this decade, along with increasing adoption of unmanned aerial systems by armed forces the world over.

At the same time, the country is exploring ways to better detect stealth aircraft. Detecting low-observable aircraft is a key element of the Indian 2020 airborne early warning and control development effort, a program likely to start in late 2014. It will be based on a yet-to-be selected widebody. This initiative follows the current Embraer EMB-145-based airborne early warning program featuring an Indian-developed, 240-deg field-of-view radar. The first of the modified regional jets is due for delivery to India in August, with radar integration to start in October.

The new system will feature a rotodome radar and be integrated with unmanned aircraft and aerostats to allow bi-static radar operations to detect stealth aircraft, says Vijay Kumar Saraswat, scientific adviser to the director general of the Indian Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO). The distributed transmitter and receiver approach should also aid in detecting small targets, such as unmanned aircraft, and provide extended-range detection, Saraswat recently told the Aerospace Forum Sweden 2012.

Dr. Saraswat's talk has been summarised in an article that appears in the latest issue of the Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine. You could read the full article below.

1-84ba704d65.jpg


Stealth version of India's Light Combat Aircraft [LCA] Tejas, Mk. 3 on the cards - AA Me, IN

Good news. But they should have waited for induction of Mark I and first flight of Mark II before outlining Mark III.
 
I think the first thing DRDO should do is to stop announcing their future projects and keep these project as secret untill they succeed ......so that their work do the talking......because all these early announcents make DRDO a laughing stock...
 
I think the first thing DRDO should do is to stop announcing their future projects and keep these project as secret untill they succeed ......so that their work do the talking......because all these early announcents make DRDO a laughing stock...
Yup totally agree with you. Mr. Sarswat is too much press friendly.
 
Yup totally agree with you. Mr. Sarswat is too much press friendly.

Sarswast is doing his job well, its about ADA who has to givee design and technial platforms not doing its job properly...we still dont know the actuall technical abilities of LCA mk2, whichc was supposed to be revealed by ADA. but still not. Saraswat is saying what he was told.....
 
Sarswast is doing his job well, its about ADA who has to givee design and technial platforms not doing its job properly...we still dont know the actuall technical abilities of LCA mk2, whichc was supposed to be revealed by ADA. but still not. Saraswat is saying what he was told.....

Hi Dash, isn't it the other way around? ADA is responsible for the airframe design as well as the integration of certain techs possibly and we know that the design of MK2 won't be that different to MK1. We even know details about these changes, like stretched and modified fuselage to integrate the additional fuel tanks and the new engine, slightly bigger inlets for more airflow to the engine, modified APU intake which is already visible with the LSP 7. What we don't know yet are actually techs that will be developed for LCA, like the radar. All we know about it is, that it will be a multi mode radar, but not if it will be the normal puls doppler MMR of MK1, or an AESA version. Similarly, we heared much about IRST, or EWS development of certain Indian companies, but we don't know if they will be integrated into MK2 or not. So actually ADA has made their case pretty open, while the other development partners are still very quiet, possibly because it's unclear how mature their developments are.
 
Hi Dash, isn't it the other way around? ADA is responsible for the airframe design as well as the integration of certain techs possibly and we know that the design of MK2 won't be that different to MK1. We even know details about these changes, like stretched and modified fuselage to integrate the additional fuel tanks and the new engine, slightly bigger inlets for more airflow to the engine, modified APU intake which is already visible with the LSP 7. What we don't know yet are actually techs that will be developed for LCA, like the radar. All we know about it is, that it will be a multi mode radar, but not if it will be the normal puls doppler MMR of MK1, or an AESA version. Similarly, we heared much about IRST, or EWS development of certain Indian companies, but we don't know if they will be integrated into MK2 or not. So actually ADA has made their case pretty open, while the other development partners are still very quiet, possibly because it's unclear how mature their developments are.

I guess AESA is for sure as Sarsawat recent interview he said its definitely gonna be AESA for Tejas Mark II.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
J10 - DO NOT have bubble canopy. If it does as per your claim LCA do have it.
Additionally it's not a siginificant advantage we are not in WW2 era to have gun fight at slow speed. It's good to have but not required, it's job better left to sensors. Even with bubble canopy you cannot see beyond 8 o'clock.

Designers knows better than you, LCA is designed to pull +9/ -3.5 G. vs J10 g limits +9/-3 g -- check which one is better.


Check your stats it's 500+ miles and is good enough for point defence plane. Please note that military planners know better than a mere fan boy.

PS: Check the thread title and Keep your bad habbits in check and stay away from bring J10 or other sino BS to this thread.


I am new here, does anyone have update spec for LCA?
I dont want to original requirements, LCA did not meed those.
 
LCA-Tejas has completed 1925 Test Flights successfully. (03-July-2012).

(TD1-233,TD2-305,PV1-242,PV2-222,PV3-348,LSP1-74,LSP2-230,PV5-36,LSP3-70,LSP4-56,LSP5-101,LSP7-4,NP1-4)

from

LCA-Tejas has completed 1911 Test Flights successfully. (02-July-2012).

(TD1-233,TD2-305,PV1-242,PV2-2​22,PV3-348,LSP1-74,LSP2-226,PV​5-36,LSP3-63,LSP4-56,LSP5-98,L​SP7-4,NP1-4)


14 flights in a day ....
 
LCA-Tejas has completed 1925 Test Flights successfully. (03-July-2012).

(TD1-233,TD2-305,PV1-242,PV2-222,PV3-348,LSP1-74,LSP2-230,PV5-36,LSP3-70,LSP4-56,LSP5-101,LSP7-4,NP1-4)

from

LCA-Tejas has completed 1911 Test Flights successfully. (02-July-2012).

(TD1-233,TD2-305,PV1-242,PV2-2​22,PV3-348,LSP1-74,LSP2-226,PV​5-36,LSP3-63,LSP4-56,LSP5-98,L​SP7-4,NP1-4)


14 flights in a day ....

LSP2-4 flights/day , LSP3-7 flights/day, LSP5-3 flights/day, what a turn around time, what a talent, kya baat kya baat kya baat:woot:
 
I don't understand, after more than 1900 flights, still LCA is not "capable" enough to serve the IAF????
 
I don't understand, after more than 1900 flights, still LCA is not "capable" enough to serve the IAF????

until and unless it gets the capability of intergalactic travel using portals it cant be inducted. mig 21 are much more capable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom