HAL Tejas | Updates, News & Discussions-[Thread 2]

[Dazzler]

Why not. But it'll be a lengthy process.

Which process is lengthy?

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Yes they are, but in technical terms, not materials. HAL forgot to consult the likes of you before importing. Next time, tell them to be more cautious.

https://twitter.com/x/status/525360880163495936

JF 17 doesn't have a quartz radome as far as I know. Yet aren't you planning an AESA for it? You just assumed the engineers didn't understand they needed a quartz radome? Maybe that the time it took to develop was longer than expected.

 

[Anish1]

This guy could alone shoot down an entire Tejas Wing forget squadron

 

[Guynextdoor2]

says a troll who once even claimed that LCA airframe 'shivers' while pulling anything more than 6Gs

And claimed that Quartz radomes aren't composite.

don't feed trolls.

 

[Dazzler]

JF 17 doesn't have a quartz radome as far as I know. Yet aren't you planning an AESA for it? You just assumed the engineers didn't understand they needed a quartz radome? Maybe that the time it took to develop was longer than expected.

Show me where I brought jf-17 into this discussion.

 

[Anish1]

Why not. But it'll be a lengthy process.



Which year is this, exactly ? 1945 ?

1914

 

[gslv mk3]

Which process is lengthy?

development of one which fits the specification & qualification and productionisation of the same.

1914

More than 103 years have passed.

 

[Anish1]

It has been more than a century of planes firing guns in the air but the failed Tejas cannot

development of one which fits the specification & qualification and productionisation of the same.



More than 103 years have passed.

103 years and Tejas still does not have that capability?

Isn't that downright f*cking shameful ?

 

[Dazzler]

development of one which fits the specification & qualification and productionisation of the same.

So was Tejas not designed to be fitted with a quartz nose cone in mind from the start? If so, why not?

 

[Anish1]

This aircraft has better air to air capability than the failed Tejas

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Show me where I brought jf-17 into this discussion.

I brought JF 17 into the discussion. Your statement that HAL guys are planning without 'understanding materials' is outright silly. Using composite was exactly the right thing to do. Because of that over 2000+ test flights that didn't need radar were carried out successfully. As mass production is ramping up the quartz radome is ready.

So was Tejas not designed to be fitted with a quartz nose cone in mind fro the start? If so, why not?

no- Tejas was tested with composite because the quartz radome was not ready then.

 

[gslv mk3]

So was Tejas not designed to be fitted with a quartz nose cone in mind fro the start? If so, why not?

You design a radome to fit the aircraft, not the other way. .

 

[Dazzler]

I brought JF 17 into the discussion. Your statement that HAL guys are planning without 'understanding materials' is outright silly. Using composite was exactly the right thing to do. Because of that over 2000+ test flights that didn't need radar were carried out successfully. As mass production is ramping up the quartz radome is ready.



no- Tejas was tested with composite because the quartz radome was not ready then.

The question remains, why HAL can't make a freaking radome?

 

[gslv mk3]

103 years and Tejas still does not have that capability?

Stupid much ? you should be crying about why LCA Tejas don't have a radial engine...

The question remains, why HAL can't make a freaking radome?

because HAL is busy making the airframe ?

 

[Anish1]