What's new

HAL pushes for AESA Equipped LCA Tejas Mark I-A (LCA-1P) as interim improved version of Mark I

To be frank present condition of HaL is like an 5 year old kid in the restaurant who instead of going for main course or sweet dish ordered buffet after seeing so many dishes on the table without thinking that even salad and soup will be more then enough to fill his stomach forget about STARTERS,Main Course and Sweet Dish...
 
A war between Public and Private enterprises !!

Making defense toys is a very profitable industry !!
 
Now THIS is the state of Indian PSUs. A bunch of sorry losers who cannot even make a hammer in the first place and they want to make new generation fighter jets!!

HAL has started whining and now they are post-poning the launch dates and wants IAF to waste money and time in buying obsolete junk and training their pilots in it. And if the IAF refuses this stupid compromise then there will be an outcry of kick-backs. This is the reality of PSUs in India - cannot complete a project and then blame the customer.

This should have counted as criminal negligence. It is not like LCA 1 or 2 will be at the same level of excellence as Ef-2000 or the Rafale. It will be a mediocre jet at best and they want IAF to cancel Rafale which is available NOW and wait for a few more YEARS so that HAL makes money at the cost of nation's security.

I wonder what the DRDO troll bots here have to say. Such failures would not have arised if Indian private sector was involved.
 
Now THIS is the state of Indian PSUs. A bunch of sorry losers who cannot even make a hammer in the first place and they want to make new generation fighter jets!!
Yeah A PSU which Manufactures Su-30 at 11 per year Rate And Over Haul & upgrade almost every fighter in IAF Inventory
This should have counted as criminal negligence. It is not like LCA 1 or 2 will be at the same level of excellence as Ef-2000 or the Rafale. It will be a mediocre jet at best and they want IAF to cancel Rafale which is available NOW and wait for a few more YEARS so that HAL makes money at the cost of nation's security.
India Don't Have 60-70 year old Aerospace Industrial Experience Like Western Giants and Funds .Its Doing What they Can do in there Minuscule funding of third World Country Like india
 
Indian Patrt: 7505926 said:
Now THIS is the state of Indian PSUs. A bunch of sorry losers who cannot even make a hammer in the first place and they want to make new generation fighter jets!!

HAL has started whining and now they are post-poning the launch dates and wants IAF to waste money and time in buying obsolete junk and training their pilots in it. And if the IAF refuses this stupid compromise then there will be an outcry of kick-backs. This is the reality of PSUs in India - cannot complete a project and then blame the customer.

This should have counted as criminal negligence. It is not like LCA 1 or 2 will be at the same level of excellence as Ef-2000 or the Rafale. It will be a mediocre jet at best and they want IAF to cancel Rafale which is available NOW and wait for a few more YEARS so that HAL makes money at the cost of nation's security.

I wonder what the DRDO troll bots here have to say. Such failures would not have arised if Indian private sector was involved.
Even your private sector can't do anything if govt don't finance the project in time....Btw do you know the program cost of your so called Rafale is 62 Billion Dollars and For Eurofighter UK is going to spend 23 Billion Pounds for the program and future upgrade...On the other hand the program cost of LCA tejas is 3 Billion Dollars...so now be my guest and compare them...
 
Even your private sector can't do anything if govt don't finance the project in time....

First it was the fault of kick-backs now it is fault of government for not giving funds? What next, aliens invaded earth?

Private sector works on their own funds, DRDO and PSUs waste public money and government's time.

Btw do you know the program cost of your so called Rafale is 62 Billion Dollars and For Eurofighter UK is going to spend 23 Billion Pounds for the program and future upgrade...

Maybe you do not know that LCA is not in the same league as Rafale or EF-2000. That is why not a single international defense think tank has ever counted LCA as world's top 10 fighters. LCA is a Mig-21 replacement which should have been ready by the 90s but it is still not considered air-worthy.

On the other hand the program cost of LCA tejas is 3 Billion Dollars...so now be my guest and compare them...

And for how many seconds will the LCA last against F-16s, EF-2000 and Rafale?
 
Somebody give Fartriot a lollipop

lollipop.jpg
 
- performance of the manufactured bird
- adhering to delivery schedule
- IAF pilot word of mouth feedback
- at least first producing the 20+ jets out of 40 orders
- the MK1A program benefits with at least 2 birds produced and handed over to IAF to showcase the achievement
- many mores milestone achievements ON TIME

perhaps if most of the boxes were ticked, IAF or even MOD/GOI could pressurise the 60-80 MK1A bird order and the requirement of keeping line busy till MK2 comes in.

BUT

this whole episode and lack of confidence showed by HAL for MK2 (with manpower problems quoted) will surely going to boomerang back.. Perhaps this will open up either more purchases from abroad and more imporantly the private sector consortium based manufacturing style of military complexes making HAL redundant over time..

I guess HAL opened its mouth way too soon.. They should have just followed "A bird in bush is worth two in the hands".. Sad turn of events if the news report is authentic and true..
 
With Tejas Mark II years away, HAL asks air force to buy Tejas Mark 1-A

42630422.jpg

HAL Tejas Mark I

HAL has aimed a serious blow at the Tejas Mark II Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), with a letter telling the Indian Air Force (IAF) that it does not have the manpower to work on developing an improved version of the current Tejas Mark I.

The Bengaluru-based public sector aviation monolith says its engineers are already stretched with existing projects, including the Tejas production line, design and prototype manufacture of a basic trainer aircraft, the Hindustan Turbo Trainer - 40 (HTT-40); and the testing and production of the Sitara Intermediate Jet Trainer (IJT).

HAL has suggested that, instead of waiting for the Tejas Mark II the IAF should buy 80 Tejas Mark I-A, an interim fighter that would be more capable then the Mark I, but less than the Mark II will be.

Business Standard has learned of a heated debate under way between the user of the Tejas, the IAF; its designer, the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA); and its manufacturer, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL).

The IAF has already committed to buying 40 Tejas Mark I. In addition, the air force has indicated it will buy four-to-five squadrons (80-100 fighters) of the Tejas Mark II when it is ready.

HAL worries about the future of its production line after it delivers 40 Mark I fighters by end-2019. It plans to build four Tejas Mark I by March 2016; another eight by March 2017; and crank up production to 16 fighters annually by March 2018. After 2019, the production line would idle till the Tejas Mark II enters production.

Senior HAL and ADA officials agree the Tejas Mark II is unlikely to enter production till 2023-24. Developing the Mark II involves fitting in a more powerful engine --- the General Electric F-414INS6 replacing the current F-404IN --- and upgrading avionics and weaponry. With prototype development likely to take till 2019, another three to four years would go in flight-testing the Tejas Mark II and preparing production drawings.

HAL, therefore, wants the IAF to buy 80 Tejas Mark I-A to keep the production line occupied from 2020 to 2023-24.

The Mark 1-A would be faster and more agile than the current Mark I. Developing it would involve shaving off 800 kilogrammes from the current fighter, especially from systems like the landing gear, which are currently "over-engineered", or built heavy, for safety. HAL also proposes to remove 300 kg of dead weight distributed across the Mark I to balance it evenly.

HAL argues that the Mark I's GE F-404IN engine, which generates 84 kiloNewtons (kN) of peak thrust, would meet the IAF's performance requirements, if one tonne is shaved off the Tejas Mark I's empty weight of 6,500 kg. In that case, the GE F-414INS6 engine's 98 kN of thrust would be needed only for the naval Tejas, which must take off from the short runway of an aircraft carrier deck.


The IAF and ADA are taken aback by HAL's reluctance to participate in developing the Mark II. Even though the Tejas project is managed by ADA --- a branch of the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO) --- HAL has developed important components. Besides many smaller systems, HAL designed the Tejas structure, its undercarriage and electrical supply system. It would have to upgrade these for the Mark II.

"We have completed the preliminary design of the Tejas Mark II, but now the detailed design will be done. HAL would have to refine and upgrade the systems it developed for the Tejas", points out a senior ADA official.

HAL's withdrawal stems from its deep-rooted concern over the Tejas assembly line, which was established at a cost of Rs 1,556 crore, with HAL paying half and the remaining shared between the IAF and navy. Keeping the line running is essential, so that skilled manpower does not have to be redistributed; and a steady flow of orders can be placed on sub-vendors.

HAL sees a four-year gap between the last Tejas Mark I and the first Tejas Mark II as seriously disruptive. Building 80 Tejas Mark I-A is a way of bridging that gap.

However, the IAF and ADA point to HAL's poor record of adhering to manufacturing schedules. They say HAL, which is more than a year late in building the Tejas Mark I, is unlikely to build and deliver 40 Tejas Mark I by 2019. So far, the Tejas line has built just one fighter.

"We can assure HAL that, if it accelerates the delivery of fighters to the point where it seems likely to deliver 40 Tejas Mark I before the Mark II is ready, we will certainly place orders for more Mark I fighters. The assembly line will not be kept idle. That is our assurance," says a senior IAF officer.

To overcome HAL's difficulties with building and assembling the Tejas Mark I, ADA proposes to adopt a new production model for the Mark II. The DRDO's aerospace chief, K Tamilmani, tells Business Standard that seven private sector companies will be chosen to manufacture the fighter's modules (systems and sub-systems). HAL will be responsible for integrating them and testing and delivering them to the IAF.

"If we have to accelerate production and build the Tejas Mark II to the requisite quality and quantity, HAL cannot be saddled with responsibility for everything. Instead, private companies will build modules, while HAL will be lead integrator," says Tamilmani.

Source:- With Tejas Mark II years away, HAL asks air force to buy Tejas Mark 1-A | Business Standard News

Heads need to be rolled

They should have first developed and handed over the MK-I instead of the whole tamasha... MkI itself is too late... I wouldn't blame your airforce but these sarkari babus and HAL & ADA..


My opinion..

Agreed these sarkari PSUs are to blame & no one else
On topic
IAF should choose this option & be done with it
 
- performance of the manufactured bird
- adhering to delivery schedule
- IAF pilot word of mouth feedback
- at least first producing the 20+ jets out of 40 orders
- the MK1A program benefits with at least 2 birds produced and handed over to IAF to showcase the achievement
- many mores milestone achievements ON TIME

perhaps if most of the boxes were ticked, IAF or even MOD/GOI could pressurise the 60-80 MK1A bird order and the requirement of keeping line busy till MK2 comes in.

BUT

this whole episode and lack of confidence showed by HAL for MK2 (with manpower problems quoted) will surely going to boomerang back.. Perhaps this will open up either more purchases from abroad and more imporantly the private sector consortium based manufacturing style of military complexes making HAL redundant over time..

I guess HAL opened its mouth way too soon.. They should have just followed "A bird in bush is worth two in the hands".. Sad turn of events if the news report is authentic and true..
thing is MP himself is behind this project (AESA based radar & EW suite on LCA MK1/1P)as we need to do something to speed up the process of induction though indian made "AESA UTTAM" is in testing most probablly EL-2052 will be there on first two squads atleast as it wont be difficult to intigrate latest version of Python5 , I Derby-ER , Derby & Lightning 3 G3 LDP on it and most proballi the production of LCA ip might be given to some private player to speed up the process and take workload off the HALs shoulders so they devote that time on speeding up MK2 & AMCA
 
They should have first developed and handed over the MK-I instead of the whole tamasha... MkI itself is too late... I wouldn't blame your airforce but these sarkari babus and HAL & ADA..


My opinion..
Man this is way to hilarious. If India would have stopped wasting money on this and ordered new Chinese lighter Fighter Jet it would have cost far less than what they have spent on this project
 
They should have first developed and handed over the MK-I instead of the whole tamasha... MkI itself is too late... I wouldn't blame your airforce but these sarkari babus and HAL & ADA..


My opinion..

As our adversary, you are feeling restless and impatient!! Imagine our situation!!
 
LCA-1P is the Mark I-A variant under consideration - The significant upgrade includes its EW package - The new LCA-MkI-P variant with the EW Package - will also add some 50 kilos of more weight.

Here you forget to remove the weight of ELTA 2032 radars also. In total

210 K G OF weight of Balast+ 90 KG Other balast (If the figure of 300 KG Dead weight is correct) +weight of 2032 ELTA shall be removed and 250 KG AESA weight shall be added. So total around 150 k g weight shall be reduced in total of Weight of ELTA 190 KG.

Landing gear weight can also be reduced by 150 to 200 KG.

There is a new wing design which is under consideration which shall also reduce the weight by a good margin. If they can slash 800 KG of wight, the jet can be much more potent. They say that there is a considerable scope of improvement in air intake and engine integration. We should also think of incorporating GE 414 into MK1 if possible. We have invested a lots of money and effort into this jet and we can not let it down. We have to pursue this project very aggressively to get best out of it. This platform offers a lots of scope and potential of improvement.

A new conditional order should be given. It should be made clear that we shall buy the jet if and only if you are able to slash weight by 800 K G As promised and improve the flight parameter as agreed upon.

It is also said that new new High strength carbon composite is developed with more strength this mean low weight+ more and more parts of carbon composite.

Saab people license the GE 404 version with 10% higher dry thrust which mean 55 Kg/n thrust. We should use this engine if required .
 
Should have been the case from beginning, initial induction and then in sequence would have introduced upgrades.
Instead of waiting it to be F22 before induction into IAF.
I give one up to Pakistanis on this with their jf17, no matter how capable it is or was at induction time but upgrades are being introduced to it, culture for jf17 is slowly being built in paf.
Same could have been done with LCA MKI, by now couple of squadrons flying while upgrade MKI P being introduced.
The numbers that LCA with all its future variants can be put in air is itself a capability being even half of what rafale is. The capability in numbers is what no other jet can give us or we can afford besides LCA.
 
I propose following change in MK1.

1) Increase some length and internal fuel if possible.
2) Guidance on single cheap.
3) Redesigned low weight High strength wings (If possible size reduction should be attampted)
4) Low weight landing gear.
5) reduce the Bolting. That adds to a lots of weight.
6) Increase engine thrust (Dry thrust in particular)
7) Redesigned redome for better aerodynamic capability as well as range increase of Radar. .
8) More composite in surface.
9) Attempt 800 KG weight reduction as promised. No dead weight.
10) Redesign Air intake and engine integration.
11) Better Radar.
12) Engine with better thrust like Gripen.

With Tejas Mark II years away, HAL asks air force to buy Tejas Mark 1-A

42630422.jpg

HAL Tejas Mark I

HAL has aimed a serious blow at the Tejas Mark II Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), with a letter telling the Indian Air Force (IAF) that it does not have the manpower to work on developing an improved version of the current Tejas Mark I.

The Bengaluru-based public sector aviation monolith says its engineers are already stretched with existing projects, including the Tejas production line, design and prototype manufacture of a basic trainer aircraft, the Hindustan Turbo Trainer - 40 (HTT-40); and the testing and production of the Sitara Intermediate Jet Trainer (IJT).

HAL has suggested that, instead of waiting for the Tejas Mark II the IAF should buy 80 Tejas Mark I-A, an interim fighter that would be more capable then the Mark I, but less than the Mark II will be.

Business Standard has learned of a heated debate under way between the user of the Tejas, the IAF; its designer, the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA); and its manufacturer, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL).

The IAF has already committed to buying 40 Tejas Mark I. In addition, the air force has indicated it will buy four-to-five squadrons (80-100 fighters) of the Tejas Mark II when it is ready.

HAL worries about the future of its production line after it delivers 40 Mark I fighters by end-2019. It plans to build four Tejas Mark I by March 2016; another eight by March 2017; and crank up production to 16 fighters annually by March 2018. After 2019, the production line would idle till the Tejas Mark II enters production.

Senior HAL and ADA officials agree the Tejas Mark II is unlikely to enter production till 2023-24. Developing the Mark II involves fitting in a more powerful engine --- the General Electric F-414INS6 replacing the current F-404IN --- and upgrading avionics and weaponry. With prototype development likely to take till 2019, another three to four years would go in flight-testing the Tejas Mark II and preparing production drawings.

HAL, therefore, wants the IAF to buy 80 Tejas Mark I-A to keep the production line occupied from 2020 to 2023-24.

The Mark 1-A would be faster and more agile than the current Mark I. Developing it would involve shaving off 800 kilogrammes from the current fighter, especially from systems like the landing gear, which are currently "over-engineered", or built heavy, for safety. HAL also proposes to remove 300 kg of dead weight distributed across the Mark I to balance it evenly.

HAL argues that the Mark I's GE F-404IN engine, which generates 84 kiloNewtons (kN) of peak thrust, would meet the IAF's performance requirements, if one tonne is shaved off the Tejas Mark I's empty weight of 6,500 kg. In that case, the GE F-414INS6 engine's 98 kN of thrust would be needed only for the naval Tejas, which must take off from the short runway of an aircraft carrier deck.


The IAF and ADA are taken aback by HAL's reluctance to participate in developing the Mark II. Even though the Tejas project is managed by ADA --- a branch of the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO) --- HAL has developed important components. Besides many smaller systems, HAL designed the Tejas structure, its undercarriage and electrical supply system. It would have to upgrade these for the Mark II.

"We have completed the preliminary design of the Tejas Mark II, but now the detailed design will be done. HAL would have to refine and upgrade the systems it developed for the Tejas", points out a senior ADA official.

HAL's withdrawal stems from its deep-rooted concern over the Tejas assembly line, which was established at a cost of Rs 1,556 crore, with HAL paying half and the remaining shared between the IAF and navy. Keeping the line running is essential, so that skilled manpower does not have to be redistributed; and a steady flow of orders can be placed on sub-vendors.

HAL sees a four-year gap between the last Tejas Mark I and the first Tejas Mark II as seriously disruptive. Building 80 Tejas Mark I-A is a way of bridging that gap.

However, the IAF and ADA point to HAL's poor record of adhering to manufacturing schedules. They say HAL, which is more than a year late in building the Tejas Mark I, is unlikely to build and deliver 40 Tejas Mark I by 2019. So far, the Tejas line has built just one fighter.

"We can assure HAL that, if it accelerates the delivery of fighters to the point where it seems likely to deliver 40 Tejas Mark I before the Mark II is ready, we will certainly place orders for more Mark I fighters. The assembly line will not be kept idle. That is our assurance," says a senior IAF officer.

To overcome HAL's difficulties with building and assembling the Tejas Mark I, ADA proposes to adopt a new production model for the Mark II. The DRDO's aerospace chief, K Tamilmani, tells Business Standard that seven private sector companies will be chosen to manufacture the fighter's modules (systems and sub-systems). HAL will be responsible for integrating them and testing and delivering them to the IAF.

"If we have to accelerate production and build the Tejas Mark II to the requisite quality and quantity, HAL cannot be saddled with responsibility for everything. Instead, private companies will build modules, while HAL will be lead integrator," says Tamilmani.

Source:- With Tejas Mark II years away, HAL asks air force to buy Tejas Mark 1-A | Business Standard News

First of all build a model withingn 2 years as promised with 800 KG lower weight. Order shall automatically follow.
 
Back
Top Bottom