Solomon2
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 19,475
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
The bounty offered isn't on his head but on evidence leading to trial. Nevertheless, Interpol properly issued a "red card" against him years ago and that still stands. Extradition to India would thus constitute due process.I insist on following due process and proving his guilt and not shooting him just because foreign entities want him dead.
You have so little confidence that the Indians won't convict him? I know the Pakistani system can convict people without evidence or damning testimony: that's what happened to Dr. Shakil Afridi. Does the Indian system really work the same way?10+ years and no damning evidence as of yet?
I'm not sure if it's "doubts" but the fact they don't want to release the evidence they have as that would involve revealing sources and means. Pakistan has a bad record of demanding access to such things then vanishing the accused and using the information gained to make the next terror attack more difficult to trace. Pakistan hasn't earned the moniker, "the ally from hell" for nothing.Surely something should have come up. That is why the US has put up this bounty as well, even it knows there is nothing to hold him for - but they too have their doubts.