What's new

Hafiz Saeed condemns Mumbai attacks

He is a UN declared terrorist. I'm not even talking about Mumbai.

He is considered Individual associated to Al-Qaida

Security Council Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee Adds Four Names to Its Sanctions List, Amends One Entry

B. Entities and other groups and undertakings associated with Al-Qaida

QE.L.118.05. Name: LASHKAR-E-TAYYIBA

A.k.a.: a) Lashkar-e-Toibab) Lashkar-i-Taiba c) al Mansoorian d) al Mansooreen e) Army of the Pure f) Army of the Righteous g) Army of the Pure and Righteous h) Paasban-e-Kashmir i) Paasban-i-Ahle- Hadith j) Pasban-e-Kashmir k) Pasban-e-Ahle-Hadith l) Paasban-e-Ahle-Hadis m) Pashan-e-ahle Hadis n) Lashkar e Tayyaba o) LET p) Jamaat-ud-Dawa q) JUD r) Jama,at al-Dawa s) Jamaat ud- Daawa t) Jamaat ul-Dawah u) Jamaat-ul-Dawa v) Jama,at-i-Dawat w) Jamaiat-ud-Dawa x) Jama,at-ud-Da,awah y) Jama,at-ud-Da,awa z) Jamaati-ud-Dawa aa) Falah-i-Insaniat Foundation (FIF) F.k.a.: na Address: na Listed on: 2 May 2005 (amended on 3 Nov. 2005, 10 Dec. 2008, 14 Mar. 2012) Other information: Associated with Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (QI.S.263.08) who is the leader of Lashkar-e-Tayyiba. Review pursuant to Security Council resolution 1822 (2008) was concluded on 8 Jun. 2010.
 
That is the point. India couldn't prove him TERRORIST and is happy by winning the title of TERRORIST only which we know how it happened. Even USA had to change their stance that they didn't had proofs and they rather announced the bounty to collect proofs. Do you think USA is also biased as you term Pakistani Courts?

But there is another side of this story which you are ignoring. This gives India a political mileage and some "vote of hatred" to some politicians. IF and IIIFFF he is terrorist, Pakistani Courts might not (according to your assumptions) but Indian Courts can declare him guilty.. or take your case to UN Courts and present evidence against him. Hafiz Saeed is already willing to fight his case in the courts and not just Pakistani Courts but UN as well. IT IS INDIA WHO IS SHYING FROM PROCEEDING THE CASE and I fail to understand you guys don't see this side of picture and are only pushing the paddle because this gives you some "sense of blaming your enemy and earning satisfaction". This is your whole "gain" and you are not looking to get "more than that".


It is as simple as India need not prove it or it does not matter what happens in Indian courts - He is a chapter 7 designated terrorist just like OBL was. AFAIK, OBL did not stand trial anywhere. If Hafiz is not a terrorist, then as per your argument, OBL is not as well - Take your pick.

He can do as much charity as he wants but either Pakistan diplomacy failed as they could not convince either one of the members when UN SC designated him as terrorist or there is concrete proof against him with various countries, that he is designated one.
 
It doesn't matter whether anyone considers him a terrorist or not, he lives in Pakistan and hence his status in Pakistan is what matters. We tried him with the full force of the law and he came out not guilty due evidence and witnesses being held by India and hence hes not guilty by the trial defaulting due to intentful sabotage of the trial by India.

We want him to go to jail, India is preventing it.
 
It doesn't matter whether anyone considers him a terrorist or not, he lives in Pakistan and hence his status in Pakistan is what matters. We tried him with the full force of the law and he came out not guilty due evidence and witnesses being held by India and hence hes not guilty by the trial defaulting due to intentful sabotage of the trial by India.

We want him to go to jail, India is preventing it.

Evidence and witnesses are inside Pakistan.

It seems Hafeez Saeed is changing his stand - JuD weekly Ghazwa had celebrated the 26/11 attack:

However, the JuD's Urdu-language weekly, Ghazva, continues to hit the newsstands, featuring hate material. Ghazva treated the Mumbai attacks as its lead story, describing the gory incident as "a historic victory for the Muslim warriors who had actually avenged the grave atrocities being committed by the Indian establishment against the Muslim minority in several parts of India and in the state of Jammu & Kashmir". In the same issue, Ghazva claimed that over 4,500 Pakistani mothers donated one son each and 83 mothers two sons each to the JuD this year. Their goal: promoting, preaching and defending Islam, besides waging jehad against the forces of the infidel.

The Gates Are Open | Amir Mir
 
It doesn't matter whether anyone considers him a terrorist or not, he lives in Pakistan and hence his status in Pakistan is what matters. We tried him with the full force of the law and he came out not guilty due evidence and witnesses being held by India and hence hes not guilty by the trial defaulting due to intentful sabotage of the trial by India.

We want him to go to jail, India is preventing it.

If you call that sham trial the "full force of law", guess your courts are quite weak then.
 
Da fool. just proves that the LeT and other terrror orgs are puppets of ISI and Pak Army. Just at the time that the Paks are trying to show fake friendship and bridge building with India this joker suddenly condemns mumbai.
the ISI has told him to do this so that they can recoup from their recent setbacks. this frog will croak louder once pak gets a little stronger and is able to focus on terrir in india.
 
"Alleged" my friend only alleged. India is yet to prove any case against him and everything which India provided was thrown away by two independent courts and supreme court deciding twice trashing all allegations. You may not have faith in Pakistani Government (which honestly speaking I don't have either) but our Courts are Independent and they have proven this over time.

But I would be surprised if you say "Who cares to listen to an alleged terrorist" because you cannot give verdict without listening the alleged. Even USA has given reward to produce evidence and they acknowledge that they have no evidence of his invlvement. They only suspect and this is their whole base of hatred - a mere suspicion.

Not alleged my friend. He IS a designated terrorist as per UNSC. Period. Pakistani courts may not agree with that, but as far as UN resolutions go, there is no ambiguity that HS is a terrorist and JuD is a terror outfit. And if you want any further assertion, just get him to travel to Europe or North America ;)
 
Da fool. just proves that the LeT and other terrror orgs are puppets of ISI and Pak Army. Just at the time that the Paks are trying to show fake friendship and bridge building with India this joker suddenly condemns mumbai.
the ISI has told him to do this so that they can recoup from their recent setbacks. this frog will croak louder once pak gets a little stronger and is able to focus on terrir in india.

But if Pak Army / ISI / JuD are changing their words at least why should it not be welcome. Obviously without letting the guard down.
 
But if Pak Army / ISI / JuD are changing their words at least why should it not be welcome. Obviously without letting the guard down.

they will revert back to terror strategy once they regain some power.. the islamics are very crooked in their thinking when it comes to these types of things. that was the case for the last 1000 years
 
Cough cough - Same courts showered petals on the guard who killed the Taseer.

cough some more cause you need that to hide yourlies, there is a differencebetween "Courts" and individaul act of layers. probably in india lawyers would be condsidered courts.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom