What's new

H6K for Pakistan Strategic Forces

0558C172-F942-44F6-9F9F-EA9220E913C0.png
It will require a lot of cover from fighter aircrafts against Indian airforce however during 65 war we did modified our C-130s for bombing missions. An aircraft like this along with a proper air cover can cause havoc in India. But are defensive nature will never allow us to go for such an aircraft purchase. We never went for a twin engine aircraft either apart from those F-6s which was more of necessity than range.


pakistan cannot event dent indias manufacturing with BMs. this plane can go around and come back awayfrom fighter attacks of india .. over arabean sea and bay of bengal

Do they have radars to lock ships? What about Anti Sub role?

https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/...e-intl-hnk/h_bd4c3d2a8f2aba5251e8a28066a515e0
 
. .
I agree we need a missile truck for naval anti surface role to launch saturated missile strikes to overwhelm defences. Even a pair of H-6Ks when inducted would pack a huge offensive punch. Karakoram AWACs could designate targets and vector fighters for air cover.

H-6K is good but the P-3C does a similar job with Harpoons. PN has a jet LRMP program for which there was a recent tender. A off the shelf jet will be procured which would be refitted for MPA use and likely since this is a customized solution we could likely have it with the ability to carry Raad-2 or Chinese antiship missiles.

So this role is something PN has intentions of fulling but with a rather multirole platform instead of purely specialized.

H6k can leave Jf17s for A2A role for Navy. free up assets and deliver loads of anti ship weapons for intended target

No mention of Radars and Anti Sub role

internet is ripe with details on this plane in anti ahip role for chinese navy
 
.
if we can leverage P3c Orions for antiship anti sub role then we can leverage H6ks as well. the arguments allow for both situations. this plane can give Pakistan the capability to go over Arabian seas for massive anti ship role. Secondly this bomber can be leveraged to go into chinese airspace and strike from north avoiding airdefences and around srilanka and back over arabean sea...

in wave attacks once pakistan take out air defenses or FoB at a standby range they can go for deep strikes and turn back..
And China and Sri lanka will allow us to use their air space (To attack India)o_O:what:, India have AWACS and Long range green pine and S-400, and as for anti ship role, it is more safer than we hover at near at GAWADAR-OMARA and fired long range anti ship missiles from their, no need to to go deep in Arabian sea it more probable that it will be shot down by Long range SAMs from Mig-29K from their aircraft carrier
 
.
Pakistan should focus on building a formidable UW capability and more projectile based strategic (and related) tech that can overwhelm and disable enemy defenses (EW, swarm tech, etc.)
 
.
how long is pakistangoing to act like a coward state... the word defence never works.. the only thing in a war an emery understands is offense ... instead of fightingn war on your territory, pakiatan ahould plan to fight war on enemy territory.. for crying out loud, are we going to say that our nukes are for defensive purposes.. how about pakistan start selling bangals to enemy troops.
Oh bahi this era is for STAND OFF MISSILES eras no need to go deep inside enemy territory, Few dozens of cruise missiles from stand off ranges do the better job than YOUR BOMBER IN A ENEMY TERRITORY
 
.
And China and Sri lanka will allow us to use their air space (To attack India)o_O:what:, India have AWACS and Long range green pine and S-400, and as for anti ship role, it is more safer than we hover at near at GAWADAR-OMARA and fired long range anti ship missiles from their, no need to to go deep in Arabian sea it more probable that it will be shot down by Long range SAMs from Mig-29K from their aircraft carrier

Sri Lanka is a reference as a way point.. China is Pakistans strategic partner, using their airspace is not an issue during war.
they are hte best planes to swarm and aink indian aircraft carrier
 
. .
Oh bahi this era is for STAND OFF MISSILES eras no need to go deep inside enemy territory, Few dozens of cruise missiles from stand off ranges do the better job than YOUR BOMBER IN A ENEMY TERRITORY

you missed the point.. when FoB and forward air defences are gone, there is a zone for these planes to go in to either carpet enemy troops or use rhat airspace to launch cruise missiles deep into enemy indsutrial complexs of deep airbases.

They carry 10 times more the cruise missiles
 
Last edited:
.
Sri Lanka is a reference as a way point.. China is Pakistans strategic partner, using their airspace is not an issue during war.
they are hte best planes to swarm and aink indian aircraft carrier
and the IN Indian ocean to allow you to go to Sri Lanka and attack from their, oh my god what a thinking you have , And China wont allow its airspace to attack from there, whether China is Pakistan strategic partner or not, it will not happen in case of war, because expanding/spreading the war involving China and fear of Nuke war etc etc
 
.
and the IN Indian ocean to allow you to go to Sri Lanka and attack from their, oh my god what a thinking you have , And China wont allow its airspace to attack from there, whether China is Pakistan strategic partner or not, it will not happen in case of war, because expanding/spreading the war involving China and fear of Nuke war etc etc

u first take care of them in arabean sea, make them retreat to bengal and strike them there too ..

sounds like u think IN is omni present in arabean sea!! Gaps are always there
use a bit of noodle first
 
.
you missed the point.. when FoB and forward air defences are gone, there is a zone for these planes to go in to either carpet enemy troops or use rhat airspace to launch cruise missiles deep into enemy indsutrial complexs of deep airbases.

They carry 10 times more the cruise missiles
We have also bases in Baluchistan, and how can it be survive from S-400 threat, to going deep inside enemy territory, all in all your H-6 use theory is all wrong
 
.
We have also bases in Baluchistan, and how can it be survive from S-400 threat, to going deep inside enemy territory, all in all your H-6 use theory is all wrong

raad is 600kms, 10 minimum can be armed on H6K and can take out s 400 batteries at standby distance..

i sense so much fear in u.. there is a counter to every threat
 
.
u first take care of them in arabean sea, make them retreat to bengal and strike them there too ..

sounds like u think IN is omni present in arabean sea!! Gaps are always there
use a bit of noodle first
and pleases tell us how this gonna be happen???, all in all your H-6K usage theory is all wrong and really stupid
 
.
.
Back
Top Bottom