What's new

Gun battles on the LOC continuing thread.

I request both IA and GHQ rawalpindi to sort out the myth of 1 pakistani = 10 hindoo baniyas which is taught by pak books..

now it is the rite time for. pak to. prove 1=10..

and there wont be any nuclear coz. chinese r theree
 
.
I request both IA and GHQ rawalpindi to sort out the myth of 1 pakistani = 10 hindoo baniyas which is taught by pak books..

now it is the rite time for. pak to. prove 1=10..

and there wont be any nuclear coz. chinese r theree
actually the correct number right now is almost 1:8
 
.
I request both IA and GHQ rawalpindi to sort out the myth of 1 pakistani = 10 hindoo baniyas which is taught by pak books..

now it is the rite time for. pak to. prove 1=10..

and there wont be any nuclear coz. chinese r theree

Don't worry u will soon get what u want & with bonus...
 
. .
I request both IA and GHQ rawalpindi to sort out the myth of 1 pakistani = 10 hindoo baniyas which is taught by pak books..

now it is the rite time for. pak to. prove 1=10..

and there wont be any nuclear coz. chinese r theree
So u belong from maratha caste who were crushed by Ahmad Shah durrani ? It's just a question
 
.
No war is coming

Our forces have responded very aggeressively in past 48 hours and in frustration they are firing in other sectors that are normally peaceful. We just need to be focus and respond with effectiveness and aggression. Things would go back to status quo soon.
 
.
no I belong to those marathas for whom adina beg had erected a huge shamiana t badhshahi mosque lahore..

and just to brush up your historical knowledge (understandable.. seeing pak board ulama textbooks) marathas were defeated by JOINT forces of Abdali, Rohilkhand and oudh.. just like niazi surrendered to joint forces.. waise hi JOINT.. and even after panipats debacle.. marathas went on to defeat british.
Yeah but niazi was in a civil war after his surrender east pak go independebt and furthur fighting was of no avail as east pak was not willing to be part of pak anymore and what did india get ? Like durrani got control till river sutlej in punjab and before pointing fingers at our study text look at ur own where ur modi type leaders are teaching to children that battle of panipat fought by akbar was actually lost by him it was just one arrow that struck the eye of hindu commander and so victory of hindus turned into defeat. Such a hilarious story
 
.
Peoples' lives are lost.
You call this a game??
Do u even realize what you are saying.
Good , you have realized that people's live are lost .
And they shouldn't celebrated with jubilation the way done on PDF , every time an indian jawan dies in cross border firing .

Also if security men die , only they wouldn't die ,civilians invariably get caught up in it whether in war or such low intensity conflicts we see on LOC .
Cross border firings should be condemned and never promoted or celebrated.
 
.
Yeah but niazi was in a civil war after his surrender east pak go independebt and furthur fighting was of no avail as east pak was not willing to be part of pak anymore and what did india get ? Like durrani got control till river sutlej in punjab.

dude what you comparing??

niazi and his army held bangladesh for more than 24 years.. marathas were from down south who had imperialistic aims which were almost shattered at panipat.. also the territories controlled by ahmed shah durr e durrani was lost very very soon..

the point is.. you cant take pride in so called defeat of marathas at panipat.. coz marathas were fighting far far away from their bastion which was not the case with ahmed shah the petty dacoit
 
.
dude what you comparing??

niazi and his army held bangladesh for more than 24 years.. marathas were from down south who had imperialistic aims which were almost shattered at panipat.. also the territories controlled by ahmed shah durr e durrani was lost very very soon..

the point is.. you cant take pride in so called defeat of marathas at panipat.. coz marathas were fighting far far away from their bastion which was not the case with ahmed shah the petty dacoit
Niazi and his army seriously ???? Not taking pride in past history as i beleive that losers live in past and as marathas were from south similarly durranis were also from west even west of river indus. At the end "khabra ta dalta khatam kawa"
 
.
no I belong to those marathas for whom adina beg had erected a huge shamiana t badhshahi mosque lahore..

and just to brush up your historical knowledge (understandable.. seeing pak board ulama textbooks) marathas were defeated by JOINT forces of Abdali, Rohilkhand and oudh.. just like niazi surrendered to joint forces.. waise hi JOINT.. and even after panipats debacle.. marathas went on to defeat british.
LOL a MASSIVE Maratha force was completely and utterly routed by much, much smaller force led by Abdali, do not try to alter history young fellow, know your place!!!!
 
. .
Niazi and his army seriously ???? Not taking pride in past history as i beleive that losers live in past and as marathas were from south similarly durranis were also from west even west of river indus. At the end "khabra ta dalta khatam kawa"

niazi and his army se mairi muraad hai GHQ rawalpindi.

and just check the distance between durranis stone age caves on afgh and dilli.. and compare it with poona and dilli..

also durrani had to just cross the khyber gomal or. bolan pass.. they had every geographical advantage.. something which you always bring up
 
.
niazi and his army se mairi muraad hai GHQ rawalpindi.

and just check the distance between durranis stone age caves on afgh and dilli.. and compare it with poona and dilli..

also durrani had to just cross the khyber gomal or. bolan pass.. they had every geographical advantage.. something which you always bring up
All these passes are at height i know but very distant from panipat how can these height can benefit a war which is being fought thousand miles far drom it.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom