Thorough Pro
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
- Messages
- 13,232
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
How do you know what was their plan? Were you part of their planning process? or pulled it out of thin air just for argument purpose?
If that was their plan from the beginning, why take the hassle of kidnapping instead of shooting them right there on the spot?
There are so many contradictions in your own statement. If ISPR didn't mentioned any Chinese, how did Chinese came to know about the op when the first bullet was fired?
Are you suggesting this news was posted on PDF by terrorists accomplices?
What are you trying to prove?
If that was their plan from the beginning, why take the hassle of kidnapping instead of shooting them right there on the spot?
There are so many contradictions in your own statement. If ISPR didn't mentioned any Chinese, how did Chinese came to know about the op when the first bullet was fired?
Are you suggesting this news was posted on PDF by terrorists accomplices?
What are you trying to prove?
How you concluded that it was the release of ops news in media which led to killings of Chinese. Whoever kidnapped them had this as the plan right from the beginning. Killing sends right kind of message from a terrorist standpoint. I am sure terrorists across the border or in other parts of Baluchistan who actually had these Chinese came to know about the op as soon as the first bullet was fired from security forces. If we read ISPR's statement carefully, there is simply no mention of abducted Chinese. I think media has confused two separate issues here. My understanding is that this op was the outcome of an investigation triggered after a suicide attack on deputy chairman Senate in which dozens of people perished. IS killed abducted Chinese as a revenge. Don't ignore the internal communication of terrorists, please. Media would have come to know about this raid days after the operation was over. The news of Chinese killing has surfaced in the last 16 hours or so.