Gulf States Face 'Humanitarian Disaster' in US-Iran War

[KingMamba]

I have a bright idea which has never been thrown out here in Arab-Iranian threads. Wait for it.... how about no war against either side??

 

[Mosamania]

You'll never see Iranians mistreating Arabs. You can ask Iraqis in Iran, or Iraqi POW's during the Iran-Iraq war. So there goes your racism-claim.

We just don't like Persian Gulf Arab regimes.

Yet you said it is the most uniting factor for Iran right? Meaning Iran would open the doors of hell open by including Arabian Gulf States armies in the war just for the sake of unifying Iran.

Well then Racism is just focused on Arabian Gulf people correct?

 

[Harry_Thomason]

I have a bright idea which has never been thrown out here in Arab-Iranian threads. Wait for it.... how about no war against either side??

That would be ideal, but it depends on US and its alies - they are pushing very hard to subdue all oil-rich countries, and Iran is a grand prize in their eyes. The biggest oil/gas resources in the World, great strategic location, big population, etc.

If Iran would fall, imagine what US could do to China, its next target. All major oil exporters in the region would be in US pocket, and China doesnt have its own, blockade would be more devastating than currently on Iran.

 

[KingMamba]

That would be ideal, but it depends on US and its alies - they are pushing very hard to subdue all oil-rich countries, and Iran is a grand prize in their eyes. The biggest oil/gas resources in the World, great strategic location, big population, etc.

If Iran would fall, imagine what US could do to China, its next target. All major oil exporters in the region would be in US pocket, and China doesnt have its own, blockade would be more devastating than currently on Iran.

Surely the US could not accomplish all this without a little Iranian help. If Iran wouldn't be so stubbornly committed to building nukes (although I believe they probably already have them and further more every country has a right to nukes) then the US would have no good reason to attack Iran. Also I do not think a ground invasion of Iran is even a possibility but yes toppling Iran would squeeze China AND India because it would make both countries tow a more pro US line for the sake of resources.

 

[Harry_Thomason]

Surely the US could not accomplish all this without a little Iranian help. If Iran wouldn't be so stubbornly committed to building nukes (although I believe they probably already have them and further more every country has a right to nukes) then the US would have no good reason to attack Iran. Also I do not think a ground invasion of Iran is even a possibility but yes toppling Iran would squeeze China AND India because it would make both countries tow a more pro US line for the sake of resources.

Lets recap: what nuclear bombs in Iraq? US found plenty of fake reasons to attack anyway. How is that any different for Iran? They didnt had nuclear bombs in 1953 either, and yet US overthrew Iran's democratic government to install puppet regime.

US tries to repeat that for decades now, just Iranians are so fed up with being ruled by genocidal British regime, and then by Shah, that they would rather suffer difficulties or even war, than to become puppets. I respect that about them, and its one of the main reasons I'm here.

 

[KingMamba]

Lets recap: what nuclear bombs in Iraq? US found plenty of fake reasons to attack anyway. How is that any different for Iran? They didnt had nuclear bombs in 1953 either, and yet US overthrew Iran's democratic government to install puppet regime.

US tries to repeat that for decades now, just Iranians are so fed up with being ruled by genocidal British regime, and then by Shah, that they would rather suffer difficulties or even war, than to become puppets. I respect that about them, and its one of the main reasons I'm here.

The US public was still emotionally reeling when Iraq was invaded so they did not ask many questions however I can testify to the fact that people here are sick of war. Some are even becoming hostile to the Zionists for their war mongering but it does not help that Iran's generals and leaders release statements every so often antagonizing the situation.

 

[Harry_Thomason]

The US public was still emotionally reeling when Iraq was invaded so they did not ask many questions however I can testify to the fact that people here are sick of war. Some are even becoming hostile to the Zionists for their war mongering but it does not help that Iran's generals and leaders release statements every so often antagonizing the situation.

Its easy to get US public emotionally reeling - another 9/11, done.

Lets not forget there were wars after Iraq too - Libya (all fake reasons to attack), illegal drone wars, now attack on Syria (fake reasons), and public preparation for war against Iran. If few years ago only 25% supported attacking Iran, after intensive propaganda now 50+% support such war.

Dont underestimate warmongers, they'll attack their chosen country with or without public support, as we see from the history - they dont need any legit reasons as well.

 

[KingMamba]

Its easy to get US public emotionally reeling - another 9/11, done.

Lets not forget there were wars after Iraq too - Libya (all fake reasons to attack), illegal drone wars, now attack on Syria (fake reasons), and public preparation for war against Iran. If few years ago only 25% supported attacking Iran, after intensive propaganda now 50+% support such war.

Dont underestimate warmongers, they'll attack their chosen country with or without public support, as we see from the history - they dont need any legit reasons as well.

France had more to do with Libya being attacked than the US, drone wars are obviously agreed to behind closed doors, and Bashar sealed his on fate when he started killing his own citizens in droves. Like I said Iran also spreads its own share of propaganda but hopefully a war is not on the Horizon (unless Romney gets elected).

 

[kollang]

king mamba,what do you think of the election?romney or Obama?

 

[Harry_Thomason]

France had more to do with Libya being attacked than the US, drone wars are obviously agreed to behind closed doors, and Bashar sealed his on fate when he started killing his own citizens in droves. Like I said Iran also spreads its own share of propaganda but hopefully a war is not on the Horizon (unless Romney gets elected).

Libya - doesnt matter which of alies had more input, US was a big player too. Reasons of attacking - fake as usual, and US public was brainwashed too.

Drones - Pakistan isnt very happy, and nobody probably even asked African countries what they think about it. fact remains, what US does is 100% illegal extrajudicial killing.

Syria - same as the 1st point, West public is brainwashed about "evil Assad", while killing of peaceful demonstrators never happened. Even you got hooked by that lie, sorry to say it. Same as people in the West are brainwashed about Iran, and its "evil plan" to "wipe Israel off the map" with nukes.

 

[Uhuhu]

The scuffle between IRAN and US is one of the most ridiculous thing i have ever seen. They have lots of common and same goals in the world, the Iranian people like USA more than any country in the region,
Iran have tried many times to improve her relationship with the world except US, they tried to talk with other countries in the world about nuclear program and ... but all of them got failed,why? because of USA.
If Iran had a good relationship with USA then If whole the world( including of EU,china,russia...) were saying Iran shouldn't have nuclear program but US supported us we could have even nuclear bomb and no one could nothing against us.
Iran tried to resolve nuclear problem with EU. but it got failed. then they realized that they should have talked with USA about that.
we just waste lots of money,time, we are suffering from sanctions only because of mullah crazy policy.
If they were logical, they made Bilateral negotiations Only with USA and everything was Resolved many times ago.

 

[Surenas]

We should indeed establish serious diplomatic talks with the Americans. I agree with Ashgarzadeh on this:

 

[Uhuhu]

We should indeed establish serious diplomatic talks with the Americans. I agree with Ashgarzadeh on this:

We should have done it long time ago. every president, Political Activists figure it out we should talk with Americans and fix the relationship, Even Ahmadinejad Got it after few years but the only person who doesn't understand is khamenei and his tag-rag s like shariatmadari who is in the video.

 

[KingMamba]

king mamba,what do you think of the election?romney or Obama?

I have not gone out to vote yet but will be voting for Obama.

 

[KingMamba]

Libya - doesnt matter which of alies had more input, US was a big player too. Reasons of attacking - fake as usual, and US public was brainwashed too.

Drones - Pakistan isnt very happy, and nobody probably even asked African countries what they think about it. fact remains, what US does is 100% illegal extrajudicial killing.

Syria - same as the 1st point, West public is brainwashed about "evil Assad", while killing of peaceful demonstrators never happened. Even you got hooked by that lie, sorry to say it. Same as people in the West are brainwashed about Iran, and its "evil plan" to "wipe Israel off the map" with nukes.

Doesn't change the fact that France was the front runner for Libyan ops and as per NATO agreement US helped out, secondly Pakistanis leaders take money and the drones use to fly out of Pakistani airbases so saying that they do not agree is foolish and African countries never protest so they must agree as well or someone would take up the matter with the UN by now. LOL I know Iran never said that and as for Syria Bashar is equal to blame for the carnage as he refuses to step down or at least have some kind of elections.