LOL. People who have no depth of knowledge about the subject, inevitably drag the subject to nonsense points with irrelevant posts after a while. And it is tragicomedy that they have only superficial thoughts even at the absurd points where they drag the subject.
***
Let's take a look from the perspective of a Greek officers:
Greek Air Force Academy - Electronics, Electrical, Telecommunications Department Lecturer Konstantinos Zikidis, some important thoughts about the Greek air force
Η αποστολή LοR (Letter of Request) for LoA (Letter of Acceptance) στις ΗΠΑ (https://defencereview.gr/polemiki-aeroporia-apostoli-episimo/) για την αγορά 20+20 F-35A πριν από λίγα μόλις εικοσιτετράωρα και αμέσως μετά την έγκριση από τη Βουλή των Ελλήνων του εκσυγχρονισμού των 38 F-16 Block 50 της...
defencereview.gr
> It is well known that I watched the F-35 in particular with reservations.
It is well known that there are about 750 registered issues (increasing instead of decreasing), very high procurement costs (not per unit, but entire package) and especially very high operating costs (company's report).
> The intention to reduce the operating cost to less than
$25,000 in 2025 seems cheesy as it is so far from reality, often disguised by the fact that this is the budget value for fiscal 2012 and not the present value.
> When it comes to detecting stealth threats like the F-35, our findings tell us that the saying holds true: on a frequency basis, the lower the better. And we know that our neighbor (TR) has several LM FPS-117 and Leonardo RAT-31D radars transmitting in the L band (relatively low).
>
These can provide a detection distance of roughly 100 nm against the F-35. In addition, Turkiye's flying radars operate in the same band.
By the end of the next decade, when we assume we will get the first F-35s, no one can prevent them from acquiring more L-band or even lower frequency radars (UHF/VHF-band).
The fact of the matter is that they may already own what they have developed/produced by that time.
> In the Greece Air Force, the Block 50 upgrade to 50M is quite a few (38). The eventual upgrade of Block 50s to Vipers will offer greater flexibility and economies of scale in terms of operating costs. Therefore, under the current circumstances, the upgrade decided seems to be the optimal solution as the budget is constrained. However, the cost of the upgrade will be much higher. however, studies, prototyping, testing, etc. will require a lot of money, a lot of time and a lot of risk. Time is a critical parameter.
>
I believe this is one of the main reasons the US decided to upgrade the 608 F-16: in the long run, it will pay for itself due to lower radar support costs, while still having the capabilities of an AESA radar.