What's new

Greece, France sign 2.3 billion-euro fighter jet deal

.
This is the most ridiculous pipe-dream I have heard on PDF F110? who said anything about F110? speculations of irrelevant stuff. It is ready 2022 with flight to take place 2023. It has progressed
without an engine, or you're EF200 engine for turkey's TFX, how can TFX fly without any engine in line??? and dont tell me INDIGENIOUS ENGINE, its take at least a decade you to design and develop decent engine, same class as F-110
Yes I agree in regards to the prototype but TFX main engine is an entirely locally produced engine and you know this much yourself so I fail to understand your whole narrative and goal
And it will be the same in class as we speak GE F110???
 
. . . .
.
Congrats to Greece. First European country to purchase the Rafale. Florence Parly couldn't get there fast enough to sign the contract she was very excited about this. 18 aircraft is a small number but those things are quite potent with their RBE2 AESA radars and SPECTRA along with other incredible technologies make up for that and then some.
 
.
Congrats to Greece. First European country to purchase the Rafale. Florence Parly couldn't get there fast enough to sign the contract she was very excited about this. 18 aircraft is a small number but those things are quite potent with their RBE2 AESA radars and SPECTRA along with other incredible technologies make up for that and then some.

Rafale multiple engagement capability enables it to engage up to 10 targets simultaneously. 18 Rafales engage as many targets as 180 Mirage 2000. Think 6 Type 45 destroyers replacing dozens of Type 42 destroyers whilst having greater total capability.
 
.
Meteor is ramjet. It's much more efficient than AIM-120C7 at long range engagement. Also, CAATSA bans AIM-120C7 sale to Turkey because Turkey won't give up S-400.
Ramjet means more drag hence its lose its energy as its depleted its fuel because of drag from ramjet intake whereas AMRAAM/ R-77 haven't these problem because of more streamline airframe and they options to long range version of R-77
Rafale multiple engagement capability enables it to engage up to 10 targets simultaneously. 18 Rafales engage as many targets as 180 Mirage 2000. Think 6 Type 45 destroyers replacing dozens of Type 42 destroyers whilst having greater total capability.
And f16 doesn't have that technology to engage multiple targets simultaneously lol you reaserh first than come here to post
 
.
Ramjet means more drag hence its lose its energy as its depleted its fuel because of drag from ramjet intake whereas AMRAAM/ R-77 haven't these problem because of more streamline airframe and they options to long range version of R-77

Egypt Su-35 getting R-37M which is latest Russian air to air missile range 400 km. It's basically air launched S-400.

 
. .
.
Egypt is key Russian ally. It arms Egyptian Su-35.


You need PESA or AESA to engage multiple simultaneously. Mechanical radars can only engage 1.
Every fourth gen jet whether it have pulse Doppler radar or AESA/PESA are able to track/engage multiple targets at once and this is old tech from 70s not new one. and its not necessary to have a PESA/AESA to track/engage multiple targets at once , F-16/F-15 upgraded mechanical radars have the capability to track and engage multiple target at once, prime example is EF-2000 mechanical radar ERC-90 has that capability as well as M-2K5 latest radar (RC-400) have also that capability
 
.
Every fourth gen jet whether it have pulse Doppler radar or AESA/PESA are able to track/engage multiple targets at once and this is old tech from 70s not new one. and its not necessary to have a PESA/AESA to track/engage multiple targets at once , F-16/F-15 upgraded mechanical radars have the capability to track and engage multiple target at once, prime example is EF-2000 mechanical radar ERC-90 has that capability as well as M-2K5 latest radar (RC-400) have also that capability

But not very well. To have effective multi target engagement radar beam must scan the entire airspace rapidly. Only PESA and AESA can do that.
 
.
But not very well. To have effective multi target engagement radar beam must scan the entire airspace rapidly. Only PESA and AESA can do that.
troll mechanically scanned radar rotates in their radomes very rapidly to cover almost 360 of air space. early fixed ASEA/PESA has limited field of view because electronic steering of the radio waves is just 13 degrees on left to right/up and down can't cover the whole sector of airspace, but recently AESA put on swashplate antennae similar to mechanical rotating radar on older fighter jets so they can cover 360 degree, and how do you know that mechanical radars can't do that very well, do you have any logic behind that
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom