What's new

General of US Intelligence says No Plane Hit The Pentagon!!!

There are loads of questions to be asked or answered, but I have two simple questions:

1. where are the passengers of these crashed flights?
2. Were they officialy buried.If they were realy dead.

My answer to both of these questions might look bit fictiteous here but does any body remember the movie called 'ERAZER'.

My two cents.
 
What about UNITED AIRLINES FIGHT 93 :cheesy:
They even made a movie out of it showing how the passengers voluntarily crashed the plane. Though a very rare case of airplane crash where the debris scatters over miles & miles . Something very very fishy. Anyone with AEROSPACE knowledge can determine the height at which the plane exploded being proportional to the area on which the debris scattered. What can we say----'magic bullet theories also exist in USA' :rofl:
 
This war was sold to the british public after 9-11 on misinformation (ie a pack of lies) as was stated by the house of lords and most MP,s in the UK.
Out of all the millions who question the 9-11 including doctors, engineers and other professionals they are all labelled as idiots and fools. It,s amazing how in the twin towers the jet fuel ignited and even melted the steel and metal of the towers in such a vigorous inferno yet they managed to find the paper passports of the terrorists.
 
So anyone who talks about 9/11 is a Conspiracy Theorist ?

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III
He retired as the Commanding General of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM). Prior to this assignment he commanded the US Army Electronics Research and Development Command (ERADCOM). During his active duty career he commanded soldiers at every level. After his retirement he served as the VP for Intelligence Systems with BDM, a major defense contractor. He has brought these experiences to leading-edge medical research and development in collaboration with his wife Rima E. Laibow, M.D.

He is a long-term out-of-the-box thinker who redesigned the U.S. Army's Intelligence Architecture while serving as the Commanding General of the U.S. Army's Intelligence School and Center. This intelligence restructuring earned him his place in the Intelligence Hall of Fame.

Among his other accomplishments, he participated in a special task force which defined the requirements of the U.S. Army for future conflict. Many of the innovations he developed helped the U.S. to conduct the First Gulf War effectively and swiftly with a very low casualty rate.
Why not? The label fits.
 
Now does this look like a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon.
You might want to do some research into camera resolutions and frame rates.

Your TV is rated at 60hz or 60 frames/sec (fps). The vast majority of surveillance cameras out there have 10 or less fps. Why should they be any higher? The intention is to record people at locations where they and whatever vehicles they are in are supposed to be slow moving, like guard gates or building entrances. Frame rates of 5-8 fps are the norm.

IP Camera based Security Setup
What frame rate is required?

A high frame rate is required if you want to record a fast moving object. But if you are using the camera for general surveillance; you may only require 1 or 2 frames/sec. The higher the frame rate the more storage space you will require.
If there is some requirement to keep these surveillance recordings for more than one day, then storage become crucial. High frame rates and high resolutions, like your TV, then make the system financially prohibitive for 99% of business out there, and that include the budget to maintain the Pentagon. So there is no way any surveillance cameras around the area can adequately identify a fast moving object like a throttle-to-max airliner.

You got suckered by these hucksters.
 
He is nuts....:crazy: ?
May be not medically, but certainly his ability to think objectively should be questioned despite all the available data out there that debunked him.
 
May be not medically, but certainly his ability to think objectively should be questioned despite all the available data out there that debunked him.

What about official videographer for the U.S. government, Kurt Sonnenfeld ?
 
This war was sold to the british public after 9-11 on misinformation (ie a pack of lies) as was stated by the house of lords and most MP,s in the UK.
Out of all the millions who question the 9-11 including doctors, engineers and other professionals they are all labelled as idiots and fools. It,s amazing how in the twin towers the jet fuel ignited and even melted the steel and metal of the towers in such a vigorous inferno yet they managed to find the paper passports of the terrorists.

Where does it say that the paper passport was found in the WTC debris ?

As regards Saddam did he not mustard gas 10000 fellow Kurdish Muslims ? Is that not a WMD ?

Regards

Ps : Please stop posting from the land of lip Stick gossip.
 
As regards Saddam did he not mustard gas 10000 fellow Kurdish Muslims ? Is that not a WMD ?

The west gave him the weapons.

Moreover - a Machine gun cal kill thousands of people, and this is not a WMD!

The british were told that he could ready weapons within 45 minutes that can kill thousands in the West.
 
The west gave him the weapons.

Moreover - a Machine gun cal kill thousands of people, and this is not a WMD!

The british were told that he could ready weapons within 45 minutes that can kill thousands in the West.

It was about Iraq but not Iraq......;) No country from the M.E. can even imagine to attack America.

N.Korea is threatening openly but America knows it cannot attack America.
 
What about official videographer for the U.S. government, Kurt Sonnenfeld ?
He is misled...
We are asked to believe that all four of the “indestructible” black boxes of the two jets that struck the twin towers were never found because they were completely vaporized,
First...No one ever said that data recorders are 'indestructible'. The fact that he used this word indicate he is more interested in hyperboles than in facts. Second...The data recorders were indeed found and submitted for analysis to the NTSB Vehicle Recorders Division on Sept 14, 2001. Recorder manufacturer model was Loral Fairchild F-2100.
yet I have footage of the rubber wheels of the landing gear nearly undamaged, as well as the seats, parts of the fuselage and a jet turbine that were absolutely not vaporized.
Good...So now he admit that there was an airliner that crashed into the Pentagon.
This being said, I do find it rather odd that such objects could have survived fairly intact the type of destruction that turned most of the Twin Towers into thin dust.
What 'thin dust'? More hyperboles to attract attention to himself, I can say. There are plenty of debris photos around, and the man is supposedly a professional photographer. Perhaps he was talking about drywall? That would account for the 'thin dust' he saw.
And I definitely harbor some doubts about the authenticity of the “jet” turbine, far too small to have come from one of the Boeings!
A jet engine is not a solid object, it is essentially a pod with mostly empty spaces. What he saw was the core of a high bypass turbofan type engine, the kind whose pod would have the largest amount of empty spaces.

May be he should have done some research and found something like this...

Aerospaceweb.org | Ask Us - Pentagon & Boeing 757 Engine Investigation
 
The west gave him the weapons.

Moreover - a Machine gun cal kill thousands of people, and this is not a WMD!

The british were told that he could ready weapons within 45 minutes that can kill thousands in the West.

Again crap. Gassing 10000 people in one go by dropping gas via a bomb is a WMD. Europe never faced a direct threat from Saddam but the Kurds, Saudi etc did. Also Saddam was happily financing all and sundry. He was a mad man. He showed how rational he was by firing Scuds every where.

Please check your facts.

Regards
 
He is misled...

General Major was ...:crazy:
Kurt Sonnenfeld......:blah:


Good...So now he admit that there was an airliner that crashed into the Pentagon.

Is he talking about Pentagon ?

that was about
What 'thin dust'? More hyperboles to attract attention to himself, I can say. There are plenty of debris photos around, and the man is supposedly a professional photographer. Perhaps he was talking about drywall? That would account for the 'thin dust' he saw.

Where you there at that time ?
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom