What's new

From basmati to sixth generation war

Bull. You're proving your net worth to this forum with every pointlessly belligerent post.


Read a book or two. Plenty of grammatical similarities exist between Sanskrit and a number of European languages. You keep obfuscating this harsh truth by demanding an identical word in some modern foreign language. Guess what mate, you're always going to "win" your little circle jerk with yourself that way. Catch up with reality. The relationship between Sanskrit and European languages - some classical, others new - exists. Be proud of it, instead of dismissing it. You're linked to ancient Greece, Rome and Europe through a common precursor. Why the shame? I don't get it. Do you think the Greeks also feel ashamed because the stem of their great language came from outside of Greece?

This is becoming a pointless argument as you are simply in denial.

The rest of your nitpicking exercise shows a few exceptions that simply emphasise the rule.

Carry on mate just as you are.

I mean there are loads of blogs, books and articles on the subject. So take your pick if you don't like the specific details of one I posted.

Or just stick your fingers in your ears and go "la la la la".
Comes back with more "sources". I'm not saying there is no relationship at all, but you failed to prove your point after repeatedly saying Sanskrit came from outside. Proof? "No, I have European lexicons similar to Sanskrit, I have Syrian people with Sanskrit names, I have this and that." But not yet anything that proves Sanskrit was used outside the Indian subcontinent, and when you don't have proof, you say, it died down. Languages die all the time lol.

And then you tried to be an expert at linguistic and started quoting Sanskrit words, which by the way was the biggest fail in this whole thread. Not only it failed to prove anything but was flimsy, showing the lack of understanding of linguistics at a fundamental level.

I don't want language family, no proto- xyz but the language, proof that Sanskrit in fact originated outside the subcontinent. Connecting proto European languages mean nothing, many greek scientists studied in India. There was historically a relation between India and Europe for thousands of years.
 
.
Comes back with more "sources". I'm not saying there is no relationship at all, but you failed to prove your point after repeatedly saying Sanskrit came from outside. Proof? "No, I have European lexicons similar to Sanskrit, I have Syrian people with Sanskrit names, I have this and that." But not yet anything that proves Sanskrit was used outside the Indian subcontinent, and when you don't have proof, you say, it died down. Languages die all the time lol.

And then you tried to be an expert at linguistic and started quoting Sanskrit words, which by the way was the biggest fail in this whole thread. Not only it failed to prove anything but was flimsy, showing the lack of understanding of linguistics at a fundamental level.

I don't want language family, no proto- xyz but the language, proof that Sanskrit in fact originated outside the subcontinent. Connecting proto European languages mean nothing, many greek scientists studied in India. There was historically a relation between India and Europe for thousands of years.
Righhhht. We're not talking odd words borrowed from Sanskrit here and there. We're talking entire declensions and word stem constructs.

You don't wait until some classical era scientific exchange program between two territories THOUSANDS OF MILES APART to come up with words for "daddy" for crying out loud. What are you smoking dude?
 
. .
Iran also start importing Pakistani Basmati rice. In business world price, tariff, quality and convenience are the major factor.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom