What's new

Freedom of speech ? Largest Democracy ?

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
Kashmir’s angry youths spurn ‘biased’ Indian media
Kashmir’s angry youths spurn ‘biased’ Indian media - The National Newspaper

NEW DELHI // While the Indian government has restricted Kashmiri media from freely reporting on the ongoing unrest, which erupted on June 11 after the killing of a 17-year-old protester by India security forces, thousands of young people are posting the latest developments on social networking sites.

“Curfew re-imposed in Islamabad, Pulwama, Kakapora, and Maisuma, valley witnesses’ complete shutdown, clashes reported in many parts of Kashmir,” reads a Facebook status update by Danish Rizwan, a student from Srinagar.

Like thousands of other internet users from Kashmir, Mr Rizwan, 20, is outraged by the way he perceives Indian radio and televeision stations and newspapers are reporting the current round of violence and unrest. He accuses the Indian media of bias and favouring anti-Kashmiri nationalism over their obligation to report truthfully.

“The Indian media takes a biased approach while reporting the present Kashmir unrest. From day one when a school boy was killed they started blaming Lashkar-i-Taiba [militants], Pakistan and other elements for the unrest without evidence or proof, and supported the killing of Kashmiris at the hand of the Indian police forces,” he said.

Threes youth were killed in Islamabad district of south Kashmir on June 29. The government and the Indian media initially reported that they were killed when police were attacked by stone throwers. On July 1, a video shot by some unknown person was released on Facebook and Youtube. It punctured the government’s version of events, and the authorities then admitted that none of three were throwing stones.

In response to this, Mr Rizwan says, thousands of Kashmiris have gone online to tell their side of the story while the government has muzzled local media.

Since Wednesday more than 50 local newspapers have stopped publishing as the government cancelled the curfew passes issued to the newspaper staff to carry out their duties. Last month, the government stopped SMS texting in the entire valley and blocked mobile phone services in north Kashmir, with an aim to stop rumors and flow of information.

“We know media has the power to shape the opinion of people, and the Indian media through its biased reporting is misleading millions of viewers in India and across the world, who otherwise would force the Indian government to stop the innocent killings in Kashmir”, Mr Rizwan said.

The current unrest in Kashmir began in June when Taufeeq Matoo was shot dead by policemen in downtown Srinagar, the summer capital of Jammu and Kashmir. Fifteen civilians died in subsequent protests across the disputed province, which is divided between India and Pakistan but claimed in full by both. The government imposed a curfew in the valley and called the Indian army onto the streets for the first time since 1995 to bring the situation under control.

New Delhi blames Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-i-Taiba for instigating the widespread protests in Kashmir. But the general belief in the valley itself, and among many Indian security analysts, is that the mass protests are indigenous and no external force is instigating people to come on to the streets. The separatist leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, who has in the past engaged in talks with the Indian government for a political resolution, castigated the Indian media for branding peaceful protesters as mobs paid off by militants.

This week an alleged mobile phone conversation between members of the Kashmiri separatist group Hurriyat Conference was aired by many Indian news channels. The channels claimed the duo was saying, “Ten to 15 more protesters must die during fresh protests”. But soon the internet was abuzz with Kashmiris circulating the actual transcript of the conversation, showing that it was all a desperate act by the government to convince protesters to give up.

“This is a mere propaganda by the government to divert the attention of world and to malign the protesters,” commented, Muiz Qadri on the Facebook page of Delhi-based news channel NDTV 24x7.

Journalists working in Kashmir claim that the Indian government has severely curbed their ability to report. Umar Baba, a senior correspondent with Srinagar-based daily Rising Kashmir, says media organisations do not trust their local reporters so they send non-local journalists who come in helicopters and government planes.

“They are also called ‘chopper reporters’ in local language. They have all the privileges from the government and get free access to any part of the valley, when local journalists are not allowed to step out of their offices,” said Umar.

Journalists working for local newspapers and TV channels have also been at the receiving end of police violence. Last week 15 local journalists, and one from the BBC, were beaten by police and Indian paramilitary forces, according to police and media reports.

USA takes side with India :

US terms Kashmir Valley protest India’s internal matter
DAWN.COM | Front Page | US terms Kashmir Valley protest India?s internal matter

WASHINGTON: The United States said on Saturday that it would like Indian and Pakistani foreign ministers to discuss the Kashmir dispute when they meet in Islamabad later this month.

US State Department’s deputy spokesman Mark Tone also told journalists that the current situation in Indian occupied Kashmir was India’s internal issue and asked protesters to conduct agitations in a peaceful manner.

“We always support dialogue between India and Pakistan,” Mr Toner said when asked if Kashmir should be discussed between the two countries.

“We regret the loss of life in this incident. It is an internal Indian matter. We respect the efforts of the government of India to investigate and resolve the current situation in Kashmir,” he said, adding that the United States had always encouraged India and Pakistan to resolve all its differences through dialogue.

“In terms of the protest, we would just urge everyone to refrain from violence and conduct protest in a free and peaceful manner,” said the US official.
 
lol at thread.

Democracy permits peaceful gathering not violent ones.

well many dont know but in India even Demanding Khalistan by peaceful means is legal and many groups do it.

democracy and terrorism cannot run side by side
 
Last edited:
lol at thread.

Democracy permits peaceful gathering not violent ones.

well many dont but in India even Demanding Khalistan by peaceful means is legal and many groups do it.

democracy and terrorism cannot run side by side
i think it is high time, we shun democracy and follow the pakistan way of government. in that case pakistan friends won't mind anything.
 
yea when you kill first then they go violent daaaaaawwwwwww....... u guys need to know KASHMIR AINT YOURS
 
yea when you kill first then they go violent daaaaaawwwwwww....... u guys need to know KASHMIR AINT YOURS

Tell me something else.............bored of hearing same thing again and again....................but still reality wont change
 
As I have predicted, Another Indo-Pakistani fight in a thread.

:sniper::sick:
:sniper::sick:
:hang2::hang2:
 
lol at thread.

Democracy permits peaceful gathering not violent ones.

well many dont know but in India even Demanding Khalistan by peaceful means is legal and many groups do it.

democracy and terrorism cannot run side by side

Yeah and the riots in Tibet + bombs in Xinjiang are perfectly peaceful right? That's why you guys can all over us for those.
 
Yeah and the riots in Tibet + bombs in Xinjiang are perfectly peaceful right? That's why you guys can all over us for those.
Plz explain what you are trying to so!!!!!!!

Thanks...............will reply after that
 
Yeah and the riots in Tibet + bombs in Xinjiang are perfectly peaceful right? That's why you guys can all over us for those.
We are not "ALL" over you for these!!?

We have clearly mentioned that we are supporting unified China, including Taiwan, and by the way...

What Prometheous popinted out was "Peaceful" process of demands.
And not Terrorisation of demands.

There is a difference in what he said and what u are relating to..
Get your facts correct.
 
Back
Top Bottom