France you got the attention of Pakistan and Kashmir

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

The more of the French weapons Indians buy and use the better for Pak....

The Marathas were confident of their French weapons and training while going for the Third Battle of Panipat....

 

[Syed1.]

First stand on your feet and then aim to show eyes to others

 

[Minho]

The more of the French weapons Indians buy and use the better for Pak....

The Marathas were confident of their French weapons and training while going for the Third Battle of Panipat....

This is how the Marathas looked after Panipat

You are aware that the French supported Muslim empires such as Tipu Sultan as well? The French supported anyone who was fighting against the British at the time, for example the Americans.

It's time to recognize the nation that is harming and is straight up involved in harming Pakistan's interest. It's about time we start doing something about France which is voting against Kashmir in UNSC and providing India with weapons to be used against Pakistan.
We should start studying the weaknesses of France to be exploited a research into developing and identifying their vulnerability. Find their enemies and support them.
If France wants to play that dirty game of making money and thinking only money then Pakistan shall look and do anything to send France a message. Wether in Afghanistan or somewhere else if needed to be.

Just curious, what are you going to do against Russia and the US? Both of those countries have consistently supported India on Kashmir and blocked UNSC action. I just think it is interesting how Pakistanis want to single out the UNSC P5 member with arguably the least global influence.

What exactly has France done that Russia hasn't?

 

[hussain0216]

This is how the Marathas looked after Panipat
View attachment 601231

You are aware that the French supported Muslim empires such as Tipu Sultan as well? The French supported anyone who was fighting against the British at the time, for example the Americans.

The Marathas were useless

A small fish trying to push around other small fish in a post mughal India

As soon as any power came to India the Marathas fell apart

They let Abdali slaughter them and gave him 100,000 Hindu women and children as whores and slaves on a plate

Then they filled the vacume again until the British humilated them

They were useless

 

[Minho]

This is the British "humiliating" the Marathas

Oh, wait, it's actually the British surrendering to the Marathas after the first Anglo Maratha war. Compare that with the "mighty" Tipu Sultan, who was defeated by the British with relative ease.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

This is the British "humiliating" the Marathas

Oh, wait, it's actually the British surrendering to the Marathas after the first Anglo Maratha war. Compare that with the "mighty" Tipu Sultan, who was defeated by the British with relative ease.

Do you ever give this broken record a rest?

Marathas and Brits needed each other's help to defeat Tipu. Get your facts right. Betrayals are what defeated Mysore.

 

[omegalamba7XL9]

This is how the Marathas looked after Panipat
View attachment 601231

You are aware that the French supported Muslim empires such as Tipu Sultan as well? The French supported anyone who was fighting against the British at the time, for example the Americans.


Just curious, what are you going to do against Russia and the US? Both of those countries have consistently supported India on Kashmir and blocked UNSC action. I just think it is interesting how Pakistanis want to single out the UNSC P5 member with arguably the least global influence.

What exactly has France done that Russia hasn't?

Dude I dont know what's your fascination with Marhtas but they are gone and are pile of ashes somewhere. This is about France and Pakistan there is no Marhata in Pakistan and no one read them as an inspiration. Why would they? Where were those great Marhatas for 1000 years when muslims came from west ruled over your land and now took a chunk of your land and have made millions and billions following the religion of yiur conquerer and you are seeing some hope in Modi to finally win back what your dream off. But we will rule your lands till the day Allah decides otherwise.
Go be a hero and Marhats on some poor east Indian fellow. We are sons of those who sent those Marhats from Panipat with their lungiess between their legs.

 

[Minho]

Dude I dont know what's your fascination with Marhtas but they are gone and are pile of ashes somewhere. This is about France and Pakistan there is no Marhata in Pakistan and no one read them as an inspiration. Why would they? Where were those great Marhatas for 1000 years when muslims came from west ruled over your land and now took a chunk of your land and have made millions and billions following the religion of yiur conquerer and you are seeing some hope in Modi to finally win back what your dream off. But we will rule your lands till the day Allah decides otherwise.
Go be a hero and Marhats on some poor east Indian fellow. We are sons of those who sent those Marhats from Panipat with their lungiess between their legs.

Except those Muslim Empires only ruled over modern Pakistan for a thousand years and parts of northern Idnia for a few centuries. The majority of India was never ruled by those empires. But that has been explained to death in countless other threads. The fact is Indian Hindus mostly defeated Invaders and limited their extent in modern India. Please read up on powers such as Vijayangara, Ahoms, etc. that defeated Mughals and Delhi Sultanate and stopped their advance. Can't say the same for modern Pakistan, which was ruled by invaders for most of its history, icluding centuries of rule by Indian Hindus.

I was simply responding to some idiotic post by another member saying the French had something to do with Panipat, and showing evidence to disprove his claims.

Now will you answer the question I asked you personally? How is France actually different from Russia when it comes to supporting India? What has France done that Russia hasn't? If anything, Russia has supported India on Kashmir even more than France.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Except those Muslim Empires only ruled over modern Pakistan for a thousand years and parts of northern Idnia for a few centuries. The majority of India was never ruled by those empires. But that has been explained to death in countless other threads. The fact is Indian Hindus mostly defeated Invaders and limited their extent in modern India. Please read up on powers such as Vijayangara, Ahoms, etc. that defeated Mughals and Delhi Sultanate and stopped their advance. Can't say the same for modern Pakistan, which was ruled by invaders for most of its history, icluding centuries of rule by Indian Hindus.

I was simply responding to some idiotic post by another member saying the French had something to do with Panipat, and showing evidence to disprove his claims.

Now will you answer the question I asked you personally? How is France actually different from Russia when it comes to supporting India? What has France done that Russia hasn't? If anything, Russia has supported India on Kashmir even more than France.

None of that was proved in other threads. You're misleading people.

 

[omegalamba7XL9]

Except those Muslim Empires only ruled over modern Pakistan for a thousand years and parts of northern Idnia for a few centuries. The majority of India was never ruled by those empires. But that has been explained to death in countless other threads. The fact is Indian Hindus mostly defeated Invaders and limited their extent in modern India. Please read up on powers such as Vijayangara, Ahoms, etc. that defeated Mughals and Delhi Sultanate and stopped their advance. Can't say the same for modern Pakistan, which was ruled by invaders for most of its history, icluding centuries of rule by Indian Hindus.

I was simply responding to some idiotic post by another member saying the French had something to do with Panipat, and showing evidence to disprove his claims.

Now will you answer the question I asked you personally? How is France actually different from Russia when it comes to supporting India? What has France done that Russia hasn't? If anything, Russia has supported India on Kashmir even more than France.

Sure I will give you simple answers and please dont ask any further explanation.
US victor of WW2 deserves respect as veto
Russia victor of WW2 deserves respect as veto
France the loser of worst kind in WW2 never deserved veto.
British Victor deserves
China. Just a best buddy so we cool.

 

[Minho]

Sure I will give you simple answers and please dont ask any further explanation.
US victor of WW2 deserves respect as veto
Russia victor of WW2 deserves respect as veto
France the loser of worst kind in WW2 never deserved veto.
British Victor deserves
China. Just a best buddy so we cool.

Thank you for the clear and concise answer

 

[El Sidd]

Sure I will give you simple answers and please dont ask any further explanation.
US victor of WW2 deserves respect as veto
Russia victor of WW2 deserves respect as veto
France the loser of worst kind in WW2 never deserved veto.
British Victor deserves
China. Just a best buddy so we cool.

How did you come to the conclusion that British won the World War 2.0 ?

 

[Vortex]

Sure I will give you simple answers and please dont ask any further explanation.
US victor of WW2 deserves respect as veto
Russia victor of WW2 deserves respect as veto
France the loser of worst kind in WW2 never deserved veto.
British Victor deserves
China. Just a best buddy so we cool.

I will correct a minor point. And it's only my personal opinion.

French deserved it. At least for the people called Resistants. They were simple people, young students and what not who worked behind enmies lines.

 

[omegalamba7XL9]

How did you come to the conclusion that British won the World War 2.0 ?

Sure
1. They never accepted the peace with Hitler
2. They dragged US boots on European soil for second time when US was in isolation policy
3. They manipulated Russians against Germans to full extent
4. Their airforce eventually out matched and out performed Germans whatever the reason may it be resources or support
5. They still survived being so close to germany and still walked away with major say in world affairs even though they were broke.

 

[El Sidd]

Sure
1. They never accepted the peace with Hitler
2. They dragged US boots on European soil for second time when US was in isolation policy
3. They manipulated Russians against Germans to full extent
4. Their airforce eventually out matched and out performed Germans whatever the reason may it be resources or support
5. They still survived being so close to germany and still walked away with major say in world affairs even though they were broke.

They lost everything. Sen Tzu says British lost the WW2