France planning to build and DOMINATE EU Army, Nato claims as nation neglects duties

[mike2000 is back]

Mate, let's say Europe produces.....10.000 F-22s and 100.000 Leos.....what does it matter when your oppenent can send hundreds of Nukes over your cities ? It's pointless to develop superior conventional weapons both in quality and quantity against Russia.

Lol T hat's a funny logic.
Guess Russia should stop building all those sukoui fighters jets, armata tanks, submarines, artilleries and other conventional military equipments since its useless against nuclear powers like U.S,U.K and France, because the U.K,FRANCE AND U.S can just nuke Russia. Lol

China should also stop building and spending much on its conventional military arsenal since its useless against a nuclear superpower like the U.S.
Good logic.

 

[bobo6661]

Mate, let's say Europe produces.....10.000 F-22s and 100.000 Leos.....what does it matter when your oppenent can send hundreds of Nukes over your cities ? It's pointless to develop superior conventional weapons both in quality and quantity against Russia.

If we talking about s-f then what stops europe to produce 10000 nukes? Its takes quite less to make russia go puff then europe.

 

[mike2000 is back]

You can't have an opinion on what Airbus would be without UK engines because the conglomerate was structured for UK engines as part of the work load.Barring in mind that France can supply jet engines for fighter jets or other planes from Dassault,your assumption is pretty hollow.Basing your info on cars but disregarding fighter jets,nuclear propulsion,helicopter tech is pretty thin,to say the least....

My brothers @UKBengali and @flamer84 I don't know why you are both arguing on such a trivial issue. Lol.
There are many fields in which Britain is ahead of France, there are also fields in which France is ahead. So let's leave it like that.
Now shake hands and maake peace.

That's just a prototype,in fact,not even that,but a tech demonstrator, while France has engines for decades and there's nothing that could coroborate your inferior tech rant.

In terms of engines we are overall ahead of them on this one. only the U.S can compare/match Britain when it comes to engine tech and efficiency.

As I said each country has it comparative advantage. France is also ahead in some fields. No single country can be the BEST in all fields.

As for Japan and France, France is still ahead of them in military tech overall. But I will say Japan is also ahead in many science and technology fields like robotics, electronics etc.
One single industrialised country cant be the best in every field as I said earlier. Not even the U.S

 

[-SINAN-]

Lol T hat's a funny logic.
Guess Russia should stop building all those sukoui fighters jets, armata tanks, submarines, artilleries and other conventional military equipments since its useless against nuclear powers like U.S,U.K and France, because the U.K,FRANCE AND U.S can just nuke Russia. Lol

China should also stop building and spending much on its conventional military arsenal since its useless against a nuclear superpower like the U.S.
Good logic.

Mate, what i'm trying to explain is...in an all out war between Nuclear States, conventional forces will be irrelevant.

Yet, Nuclear States still needs conventional forces against non Nuclear States.

If we talking about s-f then what stops europe to produce 10000 nukes? Its takes quite less to make russia go puff then europe.

Russia doesn't have 10000 cities.