What's new

‘France FINISHED’: ISIS vows wave of ‘car bombs and truck rushes’ if THESE demands not met

I couldn't agree more, Those stealth Jihadists are the real danger and from what i hear in the news, I can tell that the Europeans are playing right into their hands.

This is one area where liberals have brought about their own downfall. I am sure that they are bewildered as to why the whole world is going tribalistic at this point and will blame everything from Trump to Marine le Pen to Gert Wilders to social media, and do on. What they will not acknowledge is that their habits of instant labelling of any valid criticism of religion (more specifically one in particular) or mass migration as racist, xenophobic, etc, has lost all meaning and convinced the world that it is the liberals who are disingenuous and deceitful.
 
Why ? EU had to intervene. Now when faced with migrants and revengeful people. Why the whining ?

Like I said, continue with ignorant attitude and find that IsIS will recruit from your own borders
Who is whining? And who has an ignorant attitude? I know someone here has got an attitude (and it ain't me)
 
Who is whining? And who has an ignorant attitude? I know someone here has got an attitude (and it ain't me)
The one who is denying Europe's illegal invasion and bombing of ME. Starting with Libya ofc

So when are Europeans gonna pay for the crimes they committed ?
 
This is one area where liberals have brought about their own downfall. I am sure that they are bewildered as to why the whole world is going tribalistic at this point and will blame everything from Trump to Marine le Pen to Gert Wilders to social media, and do on. What they will not acknowledge is that their habits of instant labelling of any valid criticism of religion (more specifically one in particular) or mass migration as racist, xenophobic, etc, has lost all meaning and convinced the world that it is the liberals who are disingenuous and deceitful.
I don't like right wing governments at all, but these PC liberal idiots are just as bad as they are. And what makes the matter worse is that these idiots are operating in world scale level. It doesn't matter where these idiots are from, they always have the same ideology and thoughts. If you pick one of them from U.S or France or Germany or even Iran and another one from another corner of the world, there's nothing you can find that these idiots wouldn't agree or disagree upon. So we have a stealth Jihadi problem that is spreading throughout the world thanks to some certain countries, and we a bunch of liberal idiot that are also operating in world scale level. I'm sure together, these two groups are going to destroy the whole world.
Bankrupt ideology, there so-called state is collapsing before our eyes.
Although their so-called state is collapsing, i'm sure these idiots are going to reappear in another form.
 
Last edited:
Recently, Putin also received a letter. From the afterlife. They say that they are out of virgins and ask Putin to stop the war with ISIS for some time.

Mossad has a steady supply of virgins for Daesh!
 
The one who is denying Europe's illegal invasion and bombing of ME. Starting with Libya ofc
Kindly quote. Otherwise: what are you ON about?
Libya: There was an air campaign, not a landing of troops and occupation. Mostly France and US. UN sanctioned.
Other places: would consider on a case by case basic once you get more specific.

So when are Europeans gonna pay for the crimes they committed ?
What crimes specifically? And under what law? See, there's a lot of folks here who waive international law as not applying to their country, but the turn aronud with sentences like the one about, which presupposed international law. You can't have it both ways.
 
Although their so-called state is collapsing, i'm sure these idiots are going to reappear in another form.

The total set of grievances upon which ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, Al Shabab, Hamas, Hezbollah, LeT, Taliban, TTP, Hizbul, etc., exist is the same. When the horror show exceeds sustainable levels, then people are forced to make noises, otherwise they are free to pass off as freedom fighters and dissenters.

Not only will ISIS be replaced by another like it, that subsequent entity will be more disgusting and violent than ISIS - they have been raising the bar with each iteration and they have to be even more cruel to make an impact and stand out.

However, all of this is a sideshow. The main question is - for how long can they fool people with this charade that "this has nothing to do with doctrine"?
 
So when are Europeans gonna pay for the crimes they committed ?

What crimes specifically? And under what law? See, there's a lot of folks here who waive international law as not applying to their country, but the turn aronud with sentences like the one about, which presupposed international law. You can't have it both ways.

It is true that as colonial powers, European nations committed atrocities. Denying that would be a perversion of history. However, one must give the devil its due. Where else has an entire civilization, simply out of a sense of liberal sensibilities and collective guilt, signed its own death warrant? All previous major powers have been felled by either war or gradual decay, but Europe has signed its own surrender treaty without a fight. The change in demographics that Angela Merkel has triggered will eventually overwhelm Europe (as we know it).

By the way, the Ottomans, the Mamluks, the Mughals, and so on, where all conquering powers with their own history of heinous crimes. Why is it that Europe has to be ashamed of its imperial history, whereas we have to collectively celebrate Islamic conquest?
 
It is true that as colonial powers, European nations committed atrocities. Denying that would be a perversion of history. However, one must give the devil its due. Where else has an entire civilization, simply out of a sense of liberal sensibilities and collective guilt, signed its own death warrant? All previous major powers have been felled by either war or gradual decay, but Europe has signed its own surrender treaty without a fight. The change in demographics that Angela Merkel has triggered will eventually overwhelm Europe (as we know it).

By the way, the Ottomans, the Mamluks, the Mughals, and so on, where all conquering powers with their own history of heinous crimes. Why is it that Europe has to be ashamed of its imperial history, whereas we have to collectively celebrate Islamic conquest?


One picture speaks a thousand words.

quote-when-the-missionaries-came-to-africa-they-had-the-bible-and-we-had-the-land-they-said-desmond-tutu-29-84-86.jpg
 
celebrate Islamic conquest
Compare the Islamic conquest with that of European conquest of ME.

Kindly quote. Otherwise: what are you ON about?
Libya: There was an air campaign, not a landing of troops and occupation. Mostly France and US. UN sanctioned.
Other places: would consider on a case by case basic once you get more specific.


What crimes specifically? And under what law? See, there's a lot of folks here who waive international law as not applying to their country, but the turn aronud with sentences like the one about, which presupposed international law. You can't have it both ways.
Okay let's get into deepmshit.

US along with NaTo invasion of Iraq illegally. NO Wmds still found. The invasion left a battle hardened society and radicalised one. An entire generation and culture destroyed thanks to so-called UN mandate which never gets applied in Israel or in Burma for obvious reason

Libya intervention was sanctioned by the U.N security council including Po permanent members Russia,China,U K, France,U. S
Great, but UN is not alien it is made up of western powerful countries. So needle with their affair and face the heat. You guys have destroyed their entire society and culture. Starting with illegal invasion of Iraq. When IAEA clearly begged, but the plan was already decided in camp David. Please rad up Jhon Meyers book and el baredi book

What crimes specifically? And under what law?
Illegal no!bing and invasion of Iraq the bombing of Libya. You must know that when you were bombing Libya it will create migrant crisis.
 
It is true that as colonial powers, European nations committed atrocities. Denying that would be a perversion of history.
Check posts of mine all over this forum: I've always been the first to name and acknowledge things my own country has done in the past e.g. during its 'Golden Age' or as a colonial power.

However, one must give the devil its due. Where else has an entire civilization, simply out of a sense of liberal sensibilities and collective guilt, signed its own death warrant? All previous major powers have been felled by either war or gradual decay, but Europe has signed its own surrender treaty without a fight. The change in demographics that Angela Merkel has triggered will eventually overwhelm Europe (as we know it).

With a population of 80.2 million according to the 2011 census, rising to 81.5 million as at 30 June 2015 and to at least 81.9 million as at 31 December 2015, Germany is the most populous country in the European Union, the second most populous country in Europe after Russia, and ranks as the 16th most populous country in the world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany#Demographics

In 2014, about seven million of Germany's 81 million residents did not have German citizenship. As of 2011, about six million foreign citizens (7.7% of the population) were registered in Germany.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany#Demographics
Just 1 million added over 3 years at most.

The Federal Statistical Office classifies the citizens by immigrant background. Regarding immigrant background, 20% of the country's residents, or more than 16 million people, were of immigrant or partially immigrant descent in 2009 (including persons descending or partially descending from ethnic German repatriates). In 2010, 29% of families with children under 18 had at least one parent with immigrant roots.
In 2015, the Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs listed Germany as host to the second-highest number of international migrants worldwide, about 5% or 12 million of all 244 million migrants. Germany ranks 7th amongst EU countries and 37th globally in terms of the per centage of migrants who made up part of the country's population. As of 2014, the largest national group was from Turkey (2,859,000), followed by Poland (1,617,000), Russia (1,188,000), and Italy (764,000).[212] Since 1987, around 3 million ethnic Germans, mostly from the former Eastern Bloc countries, have exercised their right of return and emigrated to Germany.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany#Demographics
Already pre-Syrian-civil-war high % immigrant roots

As of 31 December 2014, the Federal Statistical Office of Germany estimates that there were 118,196 people with Syrian citizenship in Germany. According to the German Interior Ministry, between January 2015 and October 2015, there were 243,721 Syrian citizens who entered Germany to seek asylum. Therefore, there are more than 360,000 Syrian citizens (combined 118,196 as of December 2014 and 243,721 as of October 2015) residing in Germany as of October 2015.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrians_in_Germany

Does anyone seriously believe that taking in a couple of hundred thousand people from Syria will fundamentally change the demographics of Germany, which has a population of 81 million?

By the way, the Ottomans, the Mamluks, the Mughals, and so on, where all conquering powers with their own history of heinous crimes. Why is it that Europe has to be ashamed of its imperial history, whereas we have to collectively celebrate Islamic conquest?
Fully agree.

Illegal no!bing and invasion of Iraq the bombing of Libya. You must know that when you were bombing Libya it will create migrant crisis.
The migrant stream from north africa predates any intervention in Libya. Already during 2000-2005, an estimated 440,000 people per year emigrated from Africa, most of them to Europe.
More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_immigration_to_Europe
 
Last edited:
The migrant stream from north africa predates Libya
That too has suffered under colonialism of French band Europeans.

Is it not better to just let them be and you lot preserve you advanced societies ?
 
US along with NaTo invasion of Iraq illegally. NO Wmds still found. The invasion left a battle hardened society and radicalised one. An entire generation and culture destroyed thanks to so-called UN mandate which never gets applied in Israel or in Burma for obvious reason
There are plenty of posts of mine around this forum from which you can see my view on the issue of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. I suggest you take the time to look those up.

Of course, the locals never had anything to do with what subsequently went on in Iraq, either vis-a-vis the Americans or amongst themselves...

Great, but UN is not alien it is made up of western powerful countries. So needle with their affair and face the heat. You guys have destroyed their entire society and culture. Starting with illegal invasion of Iraq. When IAEA clearly begged, but the plan was already decided in camp David. Please rad up Jhon Meyers book and el baredi book
The UN is the 193 sovereign states that are members of it and that have equal representation in the UN General Assembly. The UN is the world's largest intergovernmental organization, ahead of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.
As opposed to the UN Security Council. The five permanent members of the Security Council were the Republic of China, the French Republic, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States. And FRS has taken on the place previously taken by CCCP. Along with the five permanent members, the Security Council has temporary members that hold their seats on a rotating basis by geographic region. These ten non-permanent members are elected by the General Assembly for two-year terms starting on 1 January, with five replaced each year.

That too has suffered under colonialism of French band Europeans.

Is it not better to just let them be and you lot preserve you advanced societies ?
Just because the stream to Europe emanates from North Africa, doesn't mean the migrants are from North Africa. In all of all of Africa there are economic reasons to move. In plenty of Africa there is conflict that gives rise to migration. One could blame all of that on the UN-SC or Europe and absolve everybody else of any and all responsibility for their own fate. Whether that would be appropriate, I think, would be a matter of serious discussion.

The Netherlands suffered invasions and atrocities at the hands of Germans, French and Brits, and more. Do we today blame them when our situation gets not so rosy?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom