What's new

FOUR-YEAR-OLD BEHEADED IN INDIA IN HUMAN SACRIFICE TO HINDU GODDESS

NIGERIANSCOOP.COM waah what a source !!

Difference is, the Quran or Islam doesnt teach you to kill a a woman for forgetting to cover her head. Hell, it doesnt even state that hijab is mandatory for a 4 year old girl. While on the other hand, human sacrafices and other barbaric practices(such as burning awoman after the death of her husband) have been VERY common in Medieval India, only until Muslim rule and influence had spread into India; had these practices become less common. According to Hinduism that sacrifice is a good deed. While in Islam, it'll be dealt according to Shariah as murder. Hijab is only Mandatory during and after Puberty.

Sati was ended by Raja ram mohan roy not any muslims . Also nothing is mandatory in Hinduism . You can be an atheist and a hindu at the same time as well .
 
.
NIGERIANSCOOP.COM waah what a source !!



Sati was ended by Raja ram mohan roy not any muslims . Also nothing is mandatory in Hinduism . You can be an atheist and a hindu at the same time as well .

I'm going to quote those,
"Attitudes of Muslim rulers[edit]
Under the Delhi Sultanate, permission had to be sought from the widow before any practice of sati as a check against compulsion. However, this later became more of a formality.[87] Mughals interfered little with local customs, but they seemed intent on stopping sati.[88] Mughal emperor Humayun (1508-1556) was the first to try a royal fiat against sati.[87] Akbar (1542–1605) was next to issue official general orders prohibiting sati and insisted that no woman could commit sati without the specific permission of his chief police officers.[87][88] The chief police officers were instructed by him to delay the woman's decision for as long as possible.[87] Pensions, gifts, and rehabilitative help were offered to the potential sati to persuade her from committing the act.[87] Tavernier, writing in the reign of Shah Jahan, observed that widows with children were not allowed in any circumstances to burn and that in other cases, governors did not readily give permission, but could be bribed to do so.[88][89]"

Man, we were really tolerant...
 
.
It is a pure Law and order situation. Unfortunate you want PM to look into such things.

it is "such things" that actually matter because a society should comprise of enlightened citizens and not brutal psychopaths.

a prime minster or any real national leader generally is supposed to lead the citizens to the enlightened path... he is not supposed to be a manager of some western weapons manufacturer.
 
.
I'm going to quote those,
"Attitudes of Muslim rulers[edit]
Under the Delhi Sultanate, permission had to be sought from the widow before any practice of sati as a check against compulsion. However, this later became more of a formality.[87] Mughals interfered little with local customs, but they seemed intent on stopping sati.[88] Mughal emperor Humayun (1508-1556) was the first to try a royal fiat against sati.[87] Akbar (1542–1605) was next to issue official general orders prohibiting sati and insisted that no woman could commit sati without the specific permission of his chief police officers.[87][88] The chief police officers were instructed by him to delay the woman's decision for as long as possible.[87] Pensions, gifts, and rehabilitative help were offered to the potential sati to persuade her from committing the act.[87] Tavernier, writing in the reign of Shah Jahan, observed that widows with children were not allowed in any circumstances to burn and that in other cases, governors did not readily give permission, but could be bribed to do so.[88][89]"

Man, we were really tolerant...

Ram Mohan Roy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
. .
ImageUploadedByDefence.pk1444141919.351285.jpg
 
.
Nigerian oddities news.....that gets it's source from "Christian news network" Funny how no other news website in India reported this Hmm!
 
.
Nigerian oddities news.....that gets it's source from "Christian news network" Funny how no other news website in India reported this Hmm!

sure, it is all a lie... india is a socialist paradise.
 
.
psychiatrists are fakers... what will they do in this??

and why should this incident be a surprise?? every hindi news tv channel has some astrologer giving his or her predictions daily... every home shopping tv channel sells some "yantra" necklace or bracelet for people to buy and ward off troubles... every indian city has some maruti van parked on roads with magical herbal cures... every park has a young fellow with a poor caged bird which will be made to hop on some playing cards and trying to predict a fool's future.

it is a national mental retardation brought about by opposition to progressive thought.

Lets not forget the Lemon and Chillies.
lemon and chilli.jpg
 
. . .
Difference is, the Quran or Islam doesnt teach you to kill a a woman for forgetting to cover her head. Hell, it doesnt even state that hijab is mandatory for a 4 year old girl. While on the other hand, human sacrafices and other barbaric practices(such as burning awoman after the death of her husband) have been VERY common in Medieval India, only until Muslim rule and influence had spread into India; had these practices become less common. According to Hinduism that sacrifice is a good deed. While in Islam, it'll be dealt according to Shariah as murder. Hijab is only Mandatory during and after Puberty.

Neither does Hinduism or Vedas teach you to do human sacrifice. How did you assert that human sacrifice or widow burning have been sanctioned by Hindu scriptures such as Vedas/Upanishads? When people quote hadiths for support of slavery,rape,terrorism,etc ,don't you say these hadiths are unreliable or that Quran is the final authority? Then why the double standards for Hinduism?

Give me one authentic text from a Śruti text of Hinduism that sanctions human sacrifice, else admit that you were wrong.
 
. . .
Why? Hindutvawadis did not do this human sacrifice,did they?
Then who killed that kid? Hindutvadis even killed innocents for animals, they are the terrorists of worst form.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom