For pakistanis only. Are you guys ready to be ruled by zardari n nawaz n their kids.this is your last chance..

[Indus Pakistan]

Our major problem is lack of education.

But what education? The one that China teaches in their schools and has made that country a budding hyperpower? Madaris education that has made Emirate of Afghanistan? This itself follows from what I said - Pakistan is a highly disjointed mob of a country.

 

[hydrabadi_arab]

U guys are naive, there has been only one party ruling Pakistan since 70s and they will keep on ruling.

This is stupid take. They control foreign policy and security. While economy is taken care by with elected government. Its hybrid regime.

Here is a fact. Only PTI government have finally started working on cancer that is Pakistan economy after mismanagement for decades that result in IMF bailouts. You finally have exports increasing again after decade of stagnation. In same time frame rest of the world have leapfrogged you.

Still PTI is political party and Imran Khan have to win election, so you see recent fixing of petrol price no matter how expensive it becomes in international market.

Point is PPP/N had only 1 job, that to manage economy and they failed miserably.

 

[SIPRA]

A majority of Pakistanis, of course, are not only ready, but anxious, to be ruled by established criminals, like Sharifs, Zardaris, Mullah Fuzla, etc etc. There is not an iota of doubt in that.

 

[El Sidd]

افغانستان میں امریکہ کو اڈے نہیں دئیے
Absolutely Not کہا
امریکی لائن سے مکمل ہٹ کر چین کے ساتھ کھل کر چلا

کشمیر پر ہر فورم پر بات کی
انڈیا کی دہشت گردی کو دنیا میں بے نقاب کیا
انڈین جارحیت کا ڈٹ کر جواب دیا ان کے دو طیارے مار گرائے

کلبھوشن کو عالمی سطح پر پیش کرکے انڈیا کی دھلائی کی ۔

ایرانی جاسوسی نیٹ ورک کو بے نقاب کیا
سعودیہ سے قیدیوں کو رہائی دلوائی
روس یوکرائن جنگ میں روس کا دورہ کیا
میڈ ان پاکستان کو پھر سے عالمی منڈیوں تک رسائی دی

پاک فوج کے مورال کو بلند کیا
یہی وہ سب وجوہات ہیں جس وجہ سے عالمی طاقتیں خان کو ہٹا کر
ٹولے کو پاکستان پر مسلط کرکے اپنے مطالبات منوانا چاہتے ہیں

He said he will make you cry.

Now to stop crying, have an old shoulder to lean on.

 

[TNT]

This is stupid take. They control foreign policy and security. While economy is taken care by with elected government. Its hybrid regime.

Here is a fact. Only PTI government have finally started working on cancer that is Pakistan economy after mismanagement for decades that result in IMF bailouts. You finally have exports increasing again after decade of stagnation. In same time frame rest of the world have leapfrogged you.

Still PTI is political party and Imran Khan have to win election, so you see recent fixing of petrol price no matter how expensive it becomes in international market.

Point is PPP/N had only 1 job, that to manage economy and they failed miserably.

U forget, they also select who will make govt.

 

[K_Bin_W]

Zardari & Nawaz!! Allah Rahem keray....

 

[ghazi52]

...
Or by this man ...
. Ajj News

https://twitter.com/x/status/1501540430189502468

...................

 

[Crimson Blue]

 

[Mav3rick]

View attachment 822533

There will be many points of views, opinions and many observations............most will lead to 1 place.

 

[Chak Bamu]

That's a ridiculous statement, in what way am I or many here not perfectly informed about decades of bhuttos and sharifs ruling our country?

If they were a disaster the first time they ruled us why do you think they will create miracles the 4th time?

In which sane democracy would this kind of retarded politics be allowed

Well then, pick a general & ask him to rule over you. I suppose the gora kind might be a better master than the brown kind, at least in UK?

The 'retarded' politics is entirely due to political generals trying to do their bosses' jobs. They break the system, use their hand-fed minions to brainwash people, & enjoy the results. The people who see this dynamic very clearly have the likes of you to contend with.

 

[Indos]

Sometimes I wish the democracy in Pakistan would just be abolished.

Set up a one-party system as China has done.

Authoritarian regime will make leaders lead about 20 years or more, human in position of leadership in a big nation for more than 15 years will likely go insane

Current example, where both leaders help to destroy their nation economies.

Erdogan of Turkey
Putin of Russia

 

[S.Y.A]

Current example, where both leaders help to destroy their nation economies.

Erdogan of Turkey
Putin of Russia

except that these people are the ones who actually re-built their economy. in asia, authoritarian rule is the only way to ensure continuation of policies and development.

 

[Menace2Society]

except that these people are the ones who actually re-built their economy. in asia, authoritarian rule is the only way to ensure continuation of policies and development.

I would say any country which is weak is open to manipulation from outsiders especially with a strategically sensitive country like Pakistan bordered next to China and India. They want to strengthen India and subdue China and they have used you for many decades.

What makes things worse there is no sincerity in the elite class and most have sold out, they encouraged them to invest in properties abroad and use it has a noose around their necks to do their bidding.

This is why IK is an outlier, he is an anomaly to them.

 

[Sayfullah]

There are serious counter-arguments & I doubt Insafi mind can grapple with them.

Care to share some of those counter arguments and enlighten us Insafis?
Everyone says there are “arguments” but no one says what those arguments are.

 

[Indos]

except that these people are the ones who actually re-built their economy. in asia, authoritarian rule is the only way to ensure continuation of policies and development.

Thats is right that both Erdogan and Putin is a good leaders for their first 10-15 years rule. This is why we should not support authoritarian regime and limit our President period into just 10-15 years.

Indonesia limit the amount of time an individual can rule our country because we know both Soekarno and Soeharto were exelen leaders in their 10-15 years rule, but become the reason of Indonesian economic down fall during the time their rule has exceeded that limit.

For parliament system under a democratic regime some how the negative effect can be mitigated like the way Margaret Teacher and Angele Merkel lead both Britain and German quite long.

Presidential system does give huge control to leaders compared to parliament system, it has both good and bad side. President system negative side should be eliminated by limiting how long an individual can be a President.