Flightglobal2018 BAF plane lists.

[Nilgiri]

why someone need war or weapons when BD is already part of india ? what india need BD provide them before even delhi open lips and ask. sometime BD bark enemies of india more then indians themselves to prove that they are faithful slaves .i don't think india will ever go hard on BD because BD will not give a chance to Delhi

Bangladesh is artillery range tiny country . indain eastern commands only have 100s time more fighters infantry artillery and navy then BD as a whole . they can wipe out Bangladesh in 10-12 hours .

We don't need to even use military, just open sluice gate of a few dams...and they know that very well. Step 2 is basically start a civil war (if its even needed), which is quite easy to do in BD. Or switch the steps order depending on situation.

Thus BD biggest policy discussion is what angle to have when bowing to India. But that does not make for very many forum topics and time waste (away from the sad brutal reality)...thus the clowns here would rather engage in day dreaming and chest thumping about "parity/deterrence" with India and "invading" Myanmar down the road (because they brutally dumped 1 million bengalis back into BD) by "acquiring" force plan stronk things.

You have to remember these are the same creatures that day dream numbers like 3 million dead by PA action in just few short months....and have no shame to hang around doing such daydreams in the very forum affiliated with that PA force.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

It looks you guys over estimate India too much . But in reality Bangladesh is called defence heaven, so it's not very easy to invade and defeat us in our land.
And also I wish we will make NUKE one day.
However for now India can't win war against Bangladesh if it attack us.
I admit if we attack first we will not win too as India is huge country with huge power, but Bangladesh defence force is not designed to attack any one first, but it's our defence force. That doesn't mean that we can't be offender, of course our army has this capability , but since we are peace loving so we are not going to attack anyone.
But if anyone attack us ( doesn't matter who), it's not easy to reach to dhaka.
We have very strong army and we are also getting strong navy, and now target is airforce. And also you can learn some natural benefit of our country, that exactly made it a defence heaven.

I like the spirit!!! But, cowering under Burma is too much!!! Need to have the capability to take the fight into the Burmese side!!! The Russian giant fighters are too much maintenance prone!!! You also need a moderate # of light/medium multi role ones too!!! And, armed UAVs, combat choppers, MLRs, howitzers etc. to take an initial advantage over Burma fast!!!!

 

[Amigator]

Myanmar, burma cannot attack BD. India babysit BD so it will also not think about war with them. BD purchase almost every war weapon from China so China is a strategic ally of BD. Who else left in race? Afghnistan? Or Russia?

Besides there is no point of attacking on BD. If they are purchasing to prepare them for a war like scenario they should have a plan. Theu should buy more defense weapons like SAMs not offence weapons like SU-30.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

why someone need war or weapons when BD is already part of india ? what india need BD provide them before even delhi open lips and ask. sometime BD bark enemies of india more then indians themselves to prove that they are faithful slaves .i don't think india will ever go hard on BD because BD will not give a chance to Delhi

You may vent as much frustration as you like, but Bangladesh will maintain friendly, co-operative relation with India. We also want good relation with Pakistan,but these two good relation will not come at the expense of other's.

Bangladesh is artillery range tiny country

What weed are you smoking? The best artillery range is 30-40 km maximum.Within this range, only big city in South Asia which can be targeted by Indian artillery is Lahore. And many tinier country than Bangladesh are doing great when it comes to defending their countries. South Korea is 2/3rd of Bangladesh by size, Taiwan 1/4th, Israel just 1/7th. Actually being tiny with packed with dense population and infrastructure has it's own advantages.War time mobility and maintenance of supply line is much easier for defending party.And also much easier to cover the country with air defence equipments.Bangladesh is about right size geographically for defence.Not too tiny, not to expansive.Much of the borders of Bangladesh demarcated by international rivers and mountainous jungle.And the interior of the country is criss-crossed with hundreds of rivers and other water bodies. It would not be easy for any invading army. With booming economy and military expansion, Bangladesh can be made a formidable fortress.

indain eastern commands only have 100s time more fighters infantry artillery and navy then BD as a whole .

Another garbage. Indian military as a whole is roughly 10 times stronger than Bangladesh conventionally.Much of this strength is concentrated in western and north western part of India .Indian eastern command is mainly geared up to protect Arunachal Pradesh and Siliguri corridor from Chinese invasion.

they can wipe out Bangladesh in 10-12 hours .

In 1971, India needed 13 days to reach Dhaka, with the back-up of 1 lakh Mukti Bahini fighters and 70 million local helping hands.Against a tiny 50k Pak troops who were demoralized by constant Mukti Bahini attack and with out much heavy weapons.

Coward Niazi choose to surrender as soon as he heard Indian miking urged him to do that. If he choose to concentrate his troops in Dhaka and continued resistance, it could have been much longer than 13 days.Many war analysts commented that Dhaka was ideal for him to put up a strong resistance until a UN ceasefire is called.At least then he could have avoided surrender and could return Pakistan with dignity.

 

[VikingRaider]

I like the spirit!!! But, cowering under Burma is too much!!! Need to have the capability to take the fight into the Burmese side!!! The Russian giant fighters are too much maintenance prone!!! You also need a moderate # of light/medium multi role ones too!!! And, armed UAVs, combat choppers, MLRs, howitzers etc. to take an initial advantage over Burma fast!!!!

I hope we will get all necessary military equipment soon. And with Myanmar i do not want to call our stance as cowering , i simply believe that this is a superior strategy.
If Bangladesh would engage in a military conflict with Myanmar , then Myanmar would get a chance to divert Rohingya issue.
SO i believe Bangladesh had the correct strategy. War is not always attacking in the battle field , but strategic war is the real war in my opinion .
Now we need to wait few more days to get the best result from UN action . You know already Myanmer are in awkward position now.
If bangladesh would engage a war, Myanmar would not face the trouble.
So let's wait and see what happened in future . If nothing further happen then it will be proved that Bangladesh standing was not so great strategically . But if the problems of Myanmar will be increased , then we will know that the position of Bangladesh was right.
Now we have no other option but to wait for the future.

We don't need to even use military, just open sluice gate of a few dams...and they know that very well.

Do not talk big, the world is not so easy.

Step 2 is basically start a civil war (if its even needed), which is quite easy to do in BD. Or switch the steps order depending on situation.

Unfortunately yes. it is not hard to provoke a civil war situation in Bangladesh.We saw this situation in 2013 -2015 before and after election. We have suffered from petrol bomb terrorism.

But I believe that was actually provocation of a foreign Intelligence agency ( most of our peoples think that this is the work of ISI as a revenge of punishing the jamati leaders.), and if in future your RAw try to trigger , I believe that we have this capability to control it as we have controlled before .
And such situation will not last forever , as Bangladeshi folks are becoming mature day by day.

Thus BD biggest policy discussion is what angle to have when bowing to India. But that does not make for very many forum topics and time waste (away from the sad brutal reality)...thus the clowns here would rather engage in day dreaming and chest thumping about "parity/deterrence" with India and "invading" Myanmar down the road (because they brutally dumped 1 million bengalis back into BD) by "acquiring" force plan stronk things.

So You are one of them who believe that Rohingyas are bangladeshi? What proofs do you have of such absurd claims?

You have to remember these are the same creatures that day dream numbers like 3 million dead by PA action in just few short months....and have no shame to hang around doing such daydreams in the very forum affiliated with that PA force.

Are we talking about 1971 in this thread ? And your statement is not rational . After the holocaust Israel and Germany are friends now . So whats the problem?

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

I hope we will get all necessary military equipment soon. And with Myanmar i do not want to call our stance as cowering , i simply believe that this is a superior strategy.
If Bangladesh would engage in a military conflict with Myanmar , then Myanmar would get a chance too divert Rohingya issue.
SO i believe Bangladesh had the correct strategy. War is not always attacking in the battle field , but strategic war is the real war in my opinion .
Now we need to wait few more days to get the best result from UN action . You know already Myanmer are in awkward position now.
If bangladesh would engage a war, Myanmar would not face the trouble.
So let's wait and see what happened in future . If nothing further happen then it will be proved that Bangladesh standing was no so great strategically . But if the problems of Myanmar will be increased , then we will know that the position of Bangladesh was right.
Now we have no other option to wait for the future.



Do not talk big, the world is not so easy.

Unfortunately yes. it is not hard to provoke a civil war situation in Bangladesh.We saw this situation in 2013 -2015 before and after election. We have suffered for petrol bomb terrorism.

But I believe that was actually provocation of a foreign Intelligence agency ( everyone think that this is ISI as a revenge of killing the jamati leaders.), and if in future your RAw try to trigger , I believe that we have this capability to control it as we have controlled before .
And such situation will not last forever , as Bangladeshi folks are becoming mature day by day.


So You are one of them who believe that Rohingyas are bangladeshi? What proofs do you have of such absurd claims?

Are we talking about 1971 in this thread ? And your statement is not rational . After the holocaust Israel and Germany are friends now . So whats the problem?

Hopefully, your waiting period for Rohinga refugees would end soon....

 

[Nilgiri]

So You are one of them who believe that Rohingyas are bangladeshi? What proofs do you have of such absurd claims?

It's been discussed too much already. The borders were drawn as they were by British... leaving populations on wrong side (ever looked at partition?). Rather than integrate with Burma (or migrate to E. Pakistan from the onset)... they stayed yet clearly identified their preferred nationality when they clamoured for Pakistan to annex Arakan. Such people do not need any 2nd chances....they are where they belong permanently now.

Are we talking about 1971 in this thread ? And your statement is not rational . After the holocaust Israel and Germany are friends now . So whats the problem?

The whole attitude of Bangladeshi posters here comes from 1971, it is always a relevant topic anywhere when BD posters show their hollow ego and stronk attitude.

Israel and Germany mended relations after holocaust because a) the accepted evidence on both sides b) Nuremberg Trial results c) Germany making reparations and accepting responsiblity.

This is very different to Bangladesh making a claim out of thin air of "3 million" and calling it a "genocide" and Pakistan not accepting that (i.e no standardised evidence, no trial procedure, no accepting of responsibility or any reparations). The closest parallel could be if holocaust survivors and descandants continually hung around in a forum organised by what they constantly scream are Nazis/holocaust deniers. But no such thing happens anywhere like that.....only Bangladeshis have this weird shameless affinity to do so.

 

[VikingRaider]

This is very different to Bangladesh making a claim out of thin air of "3 million" and calling it a "genocide" and Pakistan not accepting that

Well this figure is probably highly exaggerated I admit , but it was not even official claim before current Awami regime . And I do not think most of our peoples even think about this number .
However something happened 47 years ago , and now in Bangladesh only some hardcore Awami league supporters try to impose this number on others . Most of peoples generally do not pay attention on this topic . Not sure about the posters here though !

Rather than integrate with Burma (or migrate to E. Pakistan from the onset)... they stayed yet clearly identified their preferred nationality when they clamoured for Pakistan to annex Arakan. Such people do not need any 2nd chances....they are where they belong permanently now.

I suggest you to read (if in case you missed it) the history of the annexation of Arakan by Burmese.
But if you already know the history and still want to say that , then I have nothing to say, as I assume there is a possibility to trigger an endless argument that I don't want .
And also there is no permanent solution of such argument . So lets wait for the future and see where actually Rohingyas belong.

 

[Nilgiri]

Well this figure is probably highly exaggerated I admit , but it was not even official claim before current Awami regime . And I do not think most of our peoples even think about this number .
However something happened 47 years ago , and now in Bangladesh only some hardcore Awami league supporters try to impose this number on others . Most of peoples generally do not pay attention on this topic . Not sure about the posters here though !



I suggest you to read (if in case you missed it) the history of the annexation of Arakan by Burmese.
But if you already know the history and still want to say that , then I have nothing to say, as I assume there is a possibility to trigger an endless argument that I don't want .
And also there is no permanent solution of such argument . So lets wait for the future and see where actually Rohingyas belong.

You are new member and seem nice guy, so I dont really feel need to continue on this. Sorry, lot of your compatriots here are real piece of works so I am somewhat hardened because of that....hope to discuss something more positive and fruitful in some other thread sometime.