What's new

Fix NRC or Assam will be Islamic state: ABVP

Miyas dont live in Noakhali, Khulna, Chittagong and Dhaka.. They live in Mymensingh which saw hardly any riots..
@bluesky teach him some history man.. I am a busy man and need some project to be completed soon.. Money is waiting.
Actually, it is quite useless to teach history to a xenophobic like @Axomiya_lora or talk logic with him. He repeats like a parrot in the jungle. The Chinese-Ahoms behave better when they are in a jungle.

However, I am happy that he accepted the fact that their forefathers were real Chinese somewhere from Kunming and only their foremothers were local.
 
. .
For the uninitiated, pictures below are the difference between a classy Assamese muslim and the Bangladeshi miya illegals that have infested our state. No wonder then that our Assamese muslim brothers hate these miya smugglers and traffickers.View attachment 577429 View attachment 577430
The people in the top photo are living in Assam since Bakhtiar Khilji's war in 1205. Now, shave their Mullah beard and compare the faces with the bottom picture, they will look more handsome.

Now, why the Ahoms are called Chinki, is not it because your forefathers were Chinese?
 
.
The people in the top photo are living in Assam since Bakhtiar Khilji's war in 1205. Now, shave their Mullah beard and compare the faces with the bottom picture, they will look more handsome.
Being the xenophobe and savage that you lot are, completely missed the point i was trying to make via those two pictures. It was never about their looks.

On one hand our Assamese khilonjia muslims are making our state proud via their endeavours like the inimitable Adil Hussain and OTOH your Bongal illegal miyas bring a bad name to us via their despicable acts of swindling, smuggling, extremism, wildlife poaching, trafficking etc.
 
.
Being the xenophobe and savage that you lot are, completely missed the point i was trying to make via those two pictures. It was never about their looks.

On one hand our Assamese khilonjia muslims are making our state proud via their endeavours like the inimitable Adil Hussain and OTOH your Bongal illegal miyas bring a bad name to us via their despicable acts of swindling, smuggling, extremism, wildlife poaching, trafficking etc.
Whatever is their character, they have been living in Assam since Bakhtiar in 1205 and only 50 years before your Chinki forefathers immigrated there. But, can you legally expel your own citizens because of the crimes they committed? Is it that easy? They will grow over 50% of total Assamese population which makes the Chnkis nervous.
 
.
Being the xenophobe and savage that you lot are, completely missed the point i was trying to make via those two pictures. It was never about their looks.

On one hand our Assamese khilonjia muslims are making our state proud via their endeavours like the inimitable Adil Hussain and OTOH your Bongal illegal miyas bring a bad name to us via their despicable acts of swindling, smuggling, extremism, wildlife poaching, trafficking etc.

I believe you are high on cow piss on your poor, shithole Assam. Even before NRC it was said by me no census data indicates illegal migration. NRC proved that as well. It appears you still have fatish for this illegal Bangladeshi myth and having wet dream with your Sanghi extremist brothers.

No Bangladeshi even think of living permanently in a shit hole like Assam with less than half per capita gdp of Bangladesh.

Another thing in between 1961-1971 Muslim population decreased in Assam as many cams to Bangladesh. Plus Assam’s Muslim growth rate from 1951-2011 is lower than rest of India’s Muslim so is population growth rate of Assam.

If you want to have a logical discussion talk with facts and number not your fatish wet dream. People are busy here to respond such nonsense.

upload_2019-9-12_8-55-59.png


upload_2019-9-12_8-56-19.png


upload_2019-9-12_8-57-53.png



upload_2019-9-12_8-58-16.png


@bluesky @TopCat have you noticed Muslim growth rate is lower than Christian and other tribes despite these Sanghi and Chinese Ahoms promoting propaganda of illegal migration theory of the Muslims.
 
.
only 50 years before your Chinki forefathers immigrated there.
Mr Faux history aficionado, Tibeto Burman and Austro Asiatic tribes have been living in Assam even before your Bengali language came into being, back then you were just like your Santhal adivasi brothers in Chota-Nagpur. The Tai tribes only added to the glorious diversity of Assam.

For example, Bengalis started inhabiting in Sylhet and Cachar only since the 13th century prior to that it was the Austro Asiatics and the Tibeto Burmans like the Kacharis that lived there. You are parasites on our NE territory.

Rangpur and Mymensingh were the domain of the Koch Rajbongshis and you were the occupiers there also.
they have been living in Assam since Bakhtiar
And now you have the galls of appropriating Khilji's failed expedition as your own. That had nothing to do with you Bangladeshis. Your history in the Brahmaputra valley starts with the British colonialism of NE.
can you legally expel your own citizens because of the crimes they committed?
Only problem with that thought is that a major chunk of them are illegal miyas.
 
.
No, what i am saying is if you consider us as Chinese then you are Central Indian tribals too and if we stretch that back we can find your African lineage.
I am not considering you guys as Chinese but the reality is you are all Chinese. That is why the Indians and we call you Chinki. So, go to Arunachal and then to Kunming, your ancestral homes.
 
.
I am not considering you guys as Chinese but the reality is you are all Chinese. That is why the Indians and we call you Chinki. So, go to Arunachal and then to Kunming, your ancestral homes.

These people are not civilized Chinese.. they are the descendent of south east asian savage people
 
.
@Axomiya_lora, how are you? Please read the text below and know why you guys look like and are called Chinki by the Indians. May your mind live in peace!! Read it with open eyes and do not again ask for it. Period!!

"The Ahom kingdom was established in 1228 when the first Ahom king Sukaphaa came from Mong Mao and entered the Brahmaputra valley, crossing the rugged Patkai mountain range. He was accompanied by his three queens, two sons, several nobles and officials and their families, and soldiers totaling more than nine thousand persons".

"He crossed the Patkai and reached Namruk (Namrup) on 2 December 1228 and occupied a region on the south bank with the Burhidihing river in the north, the Dikhau river in the south and the Patkai mountains in the east".
 
.
The Ahom kingdom was established in 1228 when the first Ahom king Sukaphaa came from Mong Mao and entered the Brahmaputra valley, crossing the rugged Patkai mountain range. He was accompanied by his three queens, two sons, several nobles and officials and their families, and soldiers totaling more than nine thousand persons".
Even kindergarten kids have more intelligence than you. You have been constantly harping on for months that Ahoms came with their males only. But the link that you shared very well describe that they came with their families.

Now back off while you still have some dignity left.
 
.
Even kindergarten kids have more intelligence than you. You have been constantly harping on for months that Ahoms came with their males only. But the link that you shared very well describe that they came with their families.

Now back off while you still have some dignity left.
Not the soldiers, stupid. Learn how to understand and differentiate between English expressions. You guys still remain primitive as before. Do not you see that it is clearly mentioned that only high officials had families and not the soldiers. You must be the descendant of Shakespear of England though you look like another primitive Ahom Chinky.
 
.
He was accompanied by his three queens, two sons, several nobles and officials and their families, and soldiers
King with his Queens, noblemen and priests with their families.
Do not you see that it is clearly mentioned that only high officials had families and not the soldiers.
It is clearly mentioned that families were a part
of the entourage.

Or do you want me to tag the mods and seek their opinion on a simple English sentence. Absurdity and trolling has its limits.
 
.
It is clearly mentioned that families were a part
of the entourage.
It is clearly mentioned that only the King and a few nobles had families. The Nobles were not were forefathers. Your forefathers were a group of lowly slaves brought by the Nobles. This is why you guys remain as low-born as before. Only the Burmese could convert you to part-human by continuous torture and killing your forefathers in the boiling oil. Yet, you symbolize a sub-human monkey after even getting such a beating by the Burmese. Bloody Murkh!!
 
.
It is clearly mentioned that only the King and a few nobles had families. The Nobles were not were forefathers. Your forefathers were a group of lowly slaves brought by the Nobles.
Lol, our noble and priestly class still retain their surnames and lineage to this day, as do the warrior class. But a namashudra chamar tribal convert with little knowledge about NE can't comprehend these facts.
Only the Burmese could convert you to part-human by continuous torture and killing your forefathers in the boiling oil.
Triggered much!!
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom