First Defence.pk post reference from WIKIPEDIA

[Dubious]

where?can you post screenshots?

regards

I think he went and came back only to realize he is still in bed

hana, @WebMaster

 

[Shamain]

Oh my god i am getting tears of joy in my eyes.

 

[gambit]

We have been to CNN so this is not a big deal.

Actually, it is a bigger deal than CNN.

Wiki is persistent. CNN is not. TV and radio news are meant for quick dissemination of information and for that, the info must be edited for portability. Wiki, despite its flaws, are more like books than of TV and radio.

 

[PDF]

When someone will use that reference as a reference on PDF not knowing that reference is itself a reference based on PDF.

Refereption!

 

[Aepsilons]

On my casual strolling on Wikipedia. I found this

View attachment 259453

Research and Analysis Wing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Which the article reference on a post from defence.pk

RAW & IB's biggest anti-terror covert ops abroad

look like someone finally make this site mainstream

Congrat

@Slav Defence @WebMaster @levina @Nihonjin1051

We have been to CNN so this is not a big deal.

Sir,

From my understanding, we are reviewed and referenced from security channels as well.