PARIKRAMA
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2014
- Messages
- 4,871
- Reaction score
- 185
- Country
- Location
Whole night I waited tobsee details which are partially disclosed which indicates that certain things are lot more clear..
Reliance tie up with USC crucially indicates the talwar class story in pipavav against to my liking of getting a quick induction of existing semi finished ones from Russia directly
Again Reliance defense tieup with Antley indicates abmuch more detailed deal for AD systems with a scope of larger systems under MII which I had said before that is planned for phase 2. A article which states 4 systems in four directions around Delhi is a hogwash... Practically Delhi will never be top 5 target.. It's actually ridiculous to feel that Moscow with centralised command center having multiple S400 in regiment form protecting is being duplicated with 5 batteries based around Delhi when there is no similarity of structure.
Again by evening a publication like India Today who were first to break story about K series Missile and are respected publication indicated all is not well in FGFA camp. TBH HAL statement of progress being made in FGFA even before any summit discussion starting was a bit fishy to me.. I mean if FGFA progress is really there the first person to confirm would have been DM MP himself as that project is essentially a MII top showcase...unfortunately if the case is true the ramifications are much larger as tech for AMCA is gone kaput and in house development would mean at least 2 decades in R&D.... The solution would be first more interim Rafales and finally signing agreements with USA and F35s.. At least that's what I see.. And India becoming a much stronger non NATO ally with UK Australia Japan like access or perhaps even more.. Geopolitical implications gonna be huge.
The new 636 subs and the Nsub program are again with no information. Yday I got a new view that IN folks are not very perceptive of what in public it is being discussed about N subs from Russia. The talks of Yasen actually is not fully correct rather Yasen technologies is the reality. You see IN is clear that having SSN as Akula 2 and SSBN arihant later improved Arihant types and a new indigenously built SSN itself implies 3 aub program having 3 different sub crew training. Now Yasen induction would complicate it to 4 training programs for crew, a logistics nightmare as a new place within a shipyard gas to develop for Yasen home and basic shore facilities.. The reality was and is that Akula 2 lease had taught us that Russian SSN that has come does have some legacy tech which is inferior to IN desire primarily the sonar part where a spherical sonar was desired. That's why Arihant has USHUS and Yasen Borei all are having new advanced sonar and other technologies. IN desired such Hi tech for the second N sub lease so desire was either upgrade Kashalot implying more cost or make it in IRBIS implying wait for more time. The talks discussed about a stronger role of Russian and such Yasen Borei derived tech in domestic SSN SSBN projects... So its difficult to expect NaMo to pull this out with just one meeting..
True NaMo is expected to make things happen but Russia case is now similar to French case in our deals.. The public reaction for Rafales cost numbers MII was a honest reflection.. Now the same is being applied to Russians. Twitter war on NaMo visit failure is a strong indication of high expectations and results being not in sync..
Perhaps time has come to stop talking defense too much in public domain and do only when deal is done..
Long post.. @Abingdonboy not a very good Christmas and new year as per present information for Indian defense..
BTW a quick update in a interesting thing.. In sputnik news a headline in first page does not mention much about NaMO visit but headline article is this
Pakistan Joins Russia, Condemns Any Attempts to Topple Assad in Syria / Sputnik International
Is this an I indication? Why NaMo visit coverage is limited as compared to this article which came up sharp around 10PM IST.. Conspiracy theory???
Reliance tie up with USC crucially indicates the talwar class story in pipavav against to my liking of getting a quick induction of existing semi finished ones from Russia directly
Again Reliance defense tieup with Antley indicates abmuch more detailed deal for AD systems with a scope of larger systems under MII which I had said before that is planned for phase 2. A article which states 4 systems in four directions around Delhi is a hogwash... Practically Delhi will never be top 5 target.. It's actually ridiculous to feel that Moscow with centralised command center having multiple S400 in regiment form protecting is being duplicated with 5 batteries based around Delhi when there is no similarity of structure.
Again by evening a publication like India Today who were first to break story about K series Missile and are respected publication indicated all is not well in FGFA camp. TBH HAL statement of progress being made in FGFA even before any summit discussion starting was a bit fishy to me.. I mean if FGFA progress is really there the first person to confirm would have been DM MP himself as that project is essentially a MII top showcase...unfortunately if the case is true the ramifications are much larger as tech for AMCA is gone kaput and in house development would mean at least 2 decades in R&D.... The solution would be first more interim Rafales and finally signing agreements with USA and F35s.. At least that's what I see.. And India becoming a much stronger non NATO ally with UK Australia Japan like access or perhaps even more.. Geopolitical implications gonna be huge.
The new 636 subs and the Nsub program are again with no information. Yday I got a new view that IN folks are not very perceptive of what in public it is being discussed about N subs from Russia. The talks of Yasen actually is not fully correct rather Yasen technologies is the reality. You see IN is clear that having SSN as Akula 2 and SSBN arihant later improved Arihant types and a new indigenously built SSN itself implies 3 aub program having 3 different sub crew training. Now Yasen induction would complicate it to 4 training programs for crew, a logistics nightmare as a new place within a shipyard gas to develop for Yasen home and basic shore facilities.. The reality was and is that Akula 2 lease had taught us that Russian SSN that has come does have some legacy tech which is inferior to IN desire primarily the sonar part where a spherical sonar was desired. That's why Arihant has USHUS and Yasen Borei all are having new advanced sonar and other technologies. IN desired such Hi tech for the second N sub lease so desire was either upgrade Kashalot implying more cost or make it in IRBIS implying wait for more time. The talks discussed about a stronger role of Russian and such Yasen Borei derived tech in domestic SSN SSBN projects... So its difficult to expect NaMo to pull this out with just one meeting..
True NaMo is expected to make things happen but Russia case is now similar to French case in our deals.. The public reaction for Rafales cost numbers MII was a honest reflection.. Now the same is being applied to Russians. Twitter war on NaMo visit failure is a strong indication of high expectations and results being not in sync..
Perhaps time has come to stop talking defense too much in public domain and do only when deal is done..
Long post.. @Abingdonboy not a very good Christmas and new year as per present information for Indian defense..
BTW a quick update in a interesting thing.. In sputnik news a headline in first page does not mention much about NaMO visit but headline article is this
Pakistan Joins Russia, Condemns Any Attempts to Topple Assad in Syria / Sputnik International
Is this an I indication? Why NaMo visit coverage is limited as compared to this article which came up sharp around 10PM IST.. Conspiracy theory???