What's new

Filipino officials ban Chinese diplomat amid spat

And it's also a poor assumption to think that just because it's India it won't be able to sustain the growth. :)

So the objective thing to do, is not to make any assumptions in the first place.

Especially about what will happen in the future, since such predictions are notoriously unreliable.

All you can really count on, is what you have today. Not what you "might" have in 10 years.

And yes, I think too many people are making the assumption, that just because China could sustain double-digit growth rates for 30 years, that India will be able to do so as well.

Ten or twenty years ago, no one knew that China would be able to sustain our growth for this long. And negative "collapse" predictions were just as common as the positive ones.
 
Henry Kissinger's duplicity to the press and toward the Indians vis-à-vis the Chinese. In July of 1971, while Kissinger was in India, he told Indian officials that "under any conceivable circumstance the U.S. would back India against any Chinese pressures." In that same July meeting Kissinger said, "In any dialogue with China, we would of course not encourage her against India." However, near the end of the India-Pakistan war, in a highly secret 12/10/1971 meeting with the Chinese Ambassador to the UN Huang Ha, Kissinger did exactly this encouraging the PRC to engage in the equivalent of military action against the Indians. [Documents 14-15, 30-32]

The Tilt: The U.S. and the South Asian Crisis of 1971


And China did not even lift a finger to help Pakistan!
 
you say the future belongs to asia, just because china belongs to asia coincidently.
sorry, i cannot see any future from those asian countries apart from china.

What are you trying to say?

Are you saying that you don't know enough about Asian countries outside of China to predict their future, or are you saying that Asian countries outside of China will not be successful in the future?

I hope it's the former because the latter is not cool.
 
Now the Filipinos are getting tired of Chinese hegemonic designs so much so they have banned the Chinese diplomat.

Things are no longer in China's domain and none have any doubt that all the piety about Peace and Coexistence is nothing but allow China to do what she likes and you will have peace and coexistence.

Come in China's way in translating its hegemonic design, things will be difficult.

But for the US Philippines Treaty, China would have overrun the island.

The very fact that the US Fleet is on call, is making China behave and act more responsibly and with caution and less of grandstanding!
 
Where did this come into play? Only issue Chinese can make a comeback on. Just because India was colonised? looool You guys were colonised [by British of course], had your land taken away from you [by Japanese Samurais] and humiliated by other western and japanese forces. Without actually being colonized. Something to think about ey? :P

India's economy fell because of colonisation but Chinese economy fell without being colonised. You guys fought with EACH OTHER. lool Rupublican and Communsits. And surprisingly at the end who won? Communist party. loool :D Not a happy ending after all. Is it? :P But seriously how can population of 1.4 billion not speak against a party consisting of 4-5 million people? lol That's communism for you.

Because you couldn't sustain democracy you have to keep on saying 'masters slave' to boost your fake ego. Typical much?

India got colonised otherwise it would have been America of today. We colonised but what's Chinese excuse? And your economy was slightly bigger than us as well. :/

Boy, you don't seem to be able to read, but that's ok, house slaves don't need to read, they only need to be able to clean Masta and Missus's shoes, anything to please Masta and Missus. The Indian National Congress has only 15 million members (Indian National Congress - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) governing a country of 1.1 billion. The CPC has 80 million members governing a country of 1.3 billion.

Chinese economy fell without being colonized? No, I think it fell because of 4 wars in a row over 50 years but enlighten me if you think otherwise. India on the other hand was colonized yet Britain pumped investment into the Indian economy, built your railroads, factories and steel plants, and set up the skeleton of modern India. In 1949, Indian steel and electricity production was equal to that of China, but China had a larger population. Today, our steel industry and electricity production dwarf yours. The Hindu : The steel scenario

In 1949, China was poorer than India, and in fact poorer than Zimbabwe. Today what is the situation? An average day in modern India is worse than the darkest days of communism in China. The average death rate in India was 48/1000. During the Great Leap Forward, the death rate was only 24/1000. The death rate in India during 1990's was far higher to that of China during even Cultural Revolution in 1964.

Population of India - India Population

"Between 1911 and 1920, the birth and death rates were virtually equal--about forty-eight births and forty-eight deaths per 1,000 population. The increasing impact of curative and preventive medicine (especially mass inoculations) brought a steady decline in the death rate. By the mid-1990s, the estimated birth rate had fallen to twenty-eight per 1,000, and the estimated death rate had fallen to ten per 1,000."

Chart - Population Growth, Crude Birth & Death Rates, 1949-1996

Bigger than America? No, you would be worse than Africa if Britain didn't give you steam engine, railroad and modern government. There probably wouldn't even be an India, maybe just warring monarchies whose main export was hotel security guards and maids.
 
Free world is where the people of that country is allowed an independent mind and that country follows a path where they select or reject a leader and his political party. In other words, the people decided their Government and not the Government dictates the people.

We are not living in any fairy land. We live in freedom of mind, thought and deed and our Govt can do nothing about it. No Hukou, shukao!

We are not living in the the Orwellian 1984 syndrome unlike you!

No Big Brother watching us. No Thought Police!

Those who have Big Brother watching, dictating and who have Thought Police are but robotic in response and move around as zombies on remote control!

Can you criticise Hu or Wen?

You will be locked up like Ai Wei Wei.

We can criticise our leaders, if we don't like their policies.

The illusion you people have of being a king or queen on a political chessborad is naive to the extent of almost being cute.

You don't select your leader, some people you can never touch give you two or three differenct faces for you to choose one to your liking, making you feel like owning the show, while all those faces belong to the one and same ruling body of which you are no part.

You have abused the word freedom, i understand, that's about all you've got after all, freedom as a word.
 
First explain how such a small nation can metaphorically slap China on the face and then discuss India or the famine, desertification, lack of water, drought, starvation of China.

Of course, diverting on to other issues but the reason for this thread does indicate the total humiliation and insult faced by China which is best avoided for discussion.
 
The illusion you people have of being a king or queen on a political chessborad is naive to the extent of almost being cute.

You don't select your leader, some people you can never touch give you two or three differenct faces for you to choose one to your liking, making you feel like owning the show, while all those faces belong to the one and same ruling body of which you are no part.

You have abused the word freedom, i understand, that's about all you've got after all, freedom as a word.

Why do you even try to educate them. They are born to be house slaves begging white Masta and Missus to throw them some crumbs. We are superior to them in every way. The average Chinese is taller, smarter, stronger, lives longer, and works harder than the typical Indian. Indians have the ability to overtake us but REFUSE to do so because they are drowned in Hollywood propaganda of Masta and Missus throwing them crumbs.
 
The illusion you people have of being a king or queen on a political chessborad is naive to the extent of almost being cute.

You don't select your leader, some people you can never touch give you two or three differenct faces for you to choose one to your liking, making you feel like owning the show, while all those faces belong to the one and same ruling body of which you are no part.

You have abused the word freedom, i understand, that's about all you've got after all, freedom as a word.

You are so pathetic.

A paid up response that has no connection with the truth or reality but high on disinformation and ignorance.

Now, lets go back to the topic.

How can China take this metaphoric slap by the Philippines wherein they ban Chinese diplomats?

China claims to be in the race for being a superpower and a challenge to the US and such a small country co.cks a snoot at this might nation China?

Rather disgraceful of the Chinese diplomat to sit back and accept it.

No démarché even!

Proves that China is merely a Paper Tiger since it is afraid of the US reaction!

Interesting moniker. What is Outman in Chinese? wei ren?

Not a Han?
 
That whole South China Sea disputes looks like a high school drama to me in which the US is the school principal.:pop:
 
what free world countries? communist vietnam? japan and south korea with foreign troops stationed in their territory PERMANANTLY? philippines with a hereditary regime? what kind of fairyland are you living in?

and when you started calling people robotic zombies you lost the privilige of being taken seriously in a rational discussion, along with your sense of shame.

This is the definition of the double standard.

Anti-Communist is just an excuse, but Anti-Chinese is their true nature.
 
Back
Top Bottom