What's new

Fighter jet makers eye Indian riches after scaled-back French deal - G Lobby Vs LCA

PARIKRAMA

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
4,871
Reaction score
185
Country
India
Location
India
Fighter jet makers eye Indian riches after scaled-back French deal

(Reuters) - Foreign fighter jet makers see a multi-billion dollar opportunity in India's decision to scale back purchases of high-end aircraft from France, which may free up cash in the world's largest arms importer to buy a new fleet of mid-range planes.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced last week that India would buy 36 French Rafale jets for an estimated $4.3 billion, in effect ending talks on a larger deal for 126 planes that would have sucked up some $20 billion and locked rivals out of the market for a generation.

Sweden's Saab (SAABb.ST) and U.S. Lockheed Martin (LMT.N) are set to re-pitch their Gripen and F-16 planes, eliminated in the Rafale tender, as the kind of lighter, single-engine aircraft that Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar said on Monday the air force needed to rebuild its fleet. :hitwall:

"We are here and we are ready," said a source close to Saab. Saab was proposing to establish "fully-fledged production" of the Gripen in India alongside a local partner. :o:


Lockheed Martin may also tout its F-16, one of the most widely used fighter planes in the world, as a replacement for Russian-made MiGs that are a mainstay in India's fleet, industry sources said. Lockheed Martin declined to comment.

"The light combat aircraft opportunity is going to be there in the near future because the MiGs have to be replaced really fast," said Delhi-based defence commentator and analyst Neelam Mathews.

Russia, traditionally India's largest arms supplier, is hopeful it can sell more of its Sukhoi Su-30s, a plane partly assembled in India, to tide over the air force while it waits two years to receive the first Rafales.

Foreign manufacturers have also welcomed India's decision to negotiate directly with the French government for further Rafales.

"What is positive about the announced Rafale deal is that purchase is supposed to be based on a government-to-government agreement. We have been asking the Indian side for a long time to get back to this practice instead of tenders," said one Russian diplomat.

Moscow wants to speed up the conclusion of talks with India for the joint manufacture of a new generation stealth fighter jet, the diplomat said.

TWO-FRONT CHALLENGE

India needs to replenish an air force fleet that has fallen to 34 operational squadrons, down from 39 earlier this decade and below the government-approved strength of 42 considered necessary to face a two-front challenge from Pakistan and China.

Parrikar said on Monday that India needed 100 new light combat aircraft within five years to replace the MiG-21s, and that the heavier and pricier Rafale was not the plane to do it.

His preference would be for the indigenously-made Tejas to fill the void. But Parrikar himself has admitted the jet, in development for three decades, has limitations while the latest version still awaits final clearance.

Either way, air force officials and industry sources say India is unlikely to buy anything like the 126 planes agreed in the original deal with France after all-in costs doubled to an estimated $20 billion.

Parrikar said he had not decided how many more Rafales he might buy. Manufacturer Dassault Aviation could also pitch its single-engine Mirage if India opts for something cheaper.

Foreign planemakers may need to join forces with an Indian state-run or private partner to win orders, especially if Modi is to realise his goal of developing a military industrial base.

Under the original deal with Dassault, 108 of the jets were to be produced at a state-run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) plant. But the two sides could not agree terms.

Such disagreements could open up opportunities for nascent private players to partner foreign manufacturers and build locally, experts said.

"This could be Rafale, or any other aircraft as long as the government is able to address the core issues of tech transfer, joint production and design collaboration," said M. Matheswaran, a former Air Marshal and adviser to Hindustan Aeronautics.

($1 = 0.9328 euros)
Fighter jet makers eye Indian riches after scaled-back French deal| Reuters


Some days back i posted this from SJha tweets warning us about Gripen lobby
his tweets were
Saurav Jha @SJha1618 · 6h 6 hours ago >>

* Comrades, there is an active lobby pushing the Gripen as a Mig-21 replacement by offering a 'Make in India' scheme. #DDBI.
* This lobby first came in wanting to improve the 'LCA' by providing aerodynamic data and other consultancy support in a hangar. #DDBI.
* Their case was that Gripen is v.similar to Tejas etc etc. Now they are even talking about 'Make in India'. # DDBI.
* The situation for the Tejas program far from being comfortable is actually Code Red. I realize this now. # DDBI.
* So worried is everybody about the need for aerodynamic refinement of the Tejas platform that it is being used by an opening by the G-lobby.
* G-lobby is proposing everything from 51 % in Mk-2, 100 % for G itself under MII. Now tell me will anybody do MII on no cost no commitment?
* The best way for Indian industry to actually upgrade itself is get its hands dirty producing homegrown systems not doing spoon fed bullshit.

This is why i said light category needs to be completely domestic in nature. So that G Lobby can stop nonsense and LCA can be more focussed
This article in reuters is suggesting Lighter category single engine as direct competitors to LCA (MMRCA is not possible). GOI should throw such lobbyists out and ask them to f*** off. Light category is LCA only for our country. We dont need Gripens under Make in India to eat into LCA's market domestically
 
.
Why should we buy F-16 when the USAF are not buying them anymore. Plus it is used by PAF too so it may not be a good option for India.
Personally I think that we have Invested a lot in LCA and if we are going for 200-250 aircrafts it should be only tejas..SAAB Gripen is just not the right ans. for a light combat fighter jet.
 
.
Foreign lobies are trying hard but thanks we have Modi/Parrikar now and they are big fan of Indian products. Note his tone, when he talks about LCA.





IAF consulted on direct buy of Rafales: Parrikar
  • Shishir Gupta and Rahul Singh, Hindustan Times, New Delhi
    |
  • Updated: Apr 16, 2015 01:32 IST
  • Share
From an arms race in the Indian Ocean and the challenges of raising a mountain strike corps to the hurdles in scaling up border infrastructure and how the UPA regime ignored the military's needs, defence minister Manohar Parrikar opens up to HT in an exclusive interview.

Excerpts:

Q. Was the Indian Air Force on board when the government took the decision to buy 36 Rafale fighters under the government-to-government (G2G) route from France?

A. I consulted the Air Force to the extent it was required. They have no role in decision-making as ultimately it’s the Prime Minister’s call. I did discuss possibilities with the prime minister and he took a very bold decision which was required. If we had missed this opportunity, the entire matter would have gone into a spin and we might have had to re-start the whole procedure this year. And in another five years our requirements might have changed. Rafale induction could begin in about 18 months.

Q. You said the fighter acquisition process will be G2G now. Will India buy more Rafales or could it source fighters from other countries too?

A. I will say both options are open to us depending on reassessment of our requirements (after scrapping the tender for 126 aircraft). I will not spell out MMRCA (Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft) role but it will be very effective in certain areas. Two people travel on a scooter, 4 in a car and 20 in a bus. But 2 people can also travel in a bus but that would be wasting resources. So, we will not deploy this aircraft where it is not required. I can tell you our light combat aircraft (LCA) is also a very capable aircraft and can replace MiG-21s more than adequately. It cannot be compared with the Rafale as the latter is a heavier fighter with two engines.

Q. So India will buy more Rafales after re-assessing requirements? Where does the LCA fit in the picture?

A. I feel that some more Rafale jets may be required but need to figure out how we can acquire them. But more importantly, we need large number of aircraft to replace MiG variants over the next 8-10 years, which is their extended life. So either we go in for large-scale manufacturing of the LCA or combine some other requirements and go for a medium-weight fighter under the Make in India plan.

Some of it can be replaced by even proper stockpiling of missiles. Nowadays, one can attack some targets by proper use of missiles.

Q. Will the remaining Rafales come under Make in India programme and will Dassault Aviation set up a unit here?

A. That decision will be taken after both India and France hold talks. It will also depend on what our financial outlay is. We operate various MiG variants, Mirage 2000s, Jaguars, Sukhoi-30s and we have the LCA now. All these warplanes have different capabilities and cannot be compared. Ultimately, we may also require certain number of Rafales but how many will hinge on the cost factor. Why just 126? I would want the IAF to have 500 planes, but the question is how much I can afford. We will have to do an analysis of minimum requirement and then take a decision.

Q. The 10 years of UPA is often referred to as the lost decade for the military with several key projects getting delayed or derailed. How do you intend to reverse the damage and speed up acquisitions?

A. My focus is on projects that are stuck at different stages. I have managed to speed up these projects by 25%. There are 339 such cases that need to be dealt with. The ministry has managed to bring 58 of these to final stages of completion. Nearly 100 projects may not be required now due to long delays or changed requirements and we are looking at dropping them or putting them on the back burner. The thrust is on accelerating critical projects.

Q. What stopped the previous regime from taking quick decisions: bureaucratic inertia or lack of leadership?

A. I always say bureaucracy is colourless like water. It takes the colour of the government so you cannot totally blame them (bureaucrats). Part of the blame surely lies with them. But, it is the duty of the government or the minister to ensure proper follow-up action to crucial projects. I do not know what the previous government was doing but as far as I am concerned, review meetings are held in South Block on a daily basis.

Q. Pakistan is on course to buy 8 diesel-electric submarines from China in what would be one of Beijing's biggest exports. How do you think it will change the dynamics in the Indian Ocean region?

A. Of course, a submarine in itself is a very powerful platform in the ocean. It may, however, not directly pose a threat to India. But it does become a weakness in your armour of controlling the ocean. We will have to match it. I do not see it as a big problem because we will have enough submarines by the time Pakistan gets these 8. By the time they get the deliveries, we can manufacture 15-20 submarines.

Q. You have said the UPA regime cleared the mountain strike corps project in the eastern sector without factoring in availability of funds? What outlay are you planning to set aside for it?

A. The previous government had estimated it will cost Rs 88,000 crore and will have 70,000 soldiers. I have frozen the cost at Rs 38,000 crore over next eight years. It will consist of 35,000 men. The CCS had cleared the original proposal, but where is the money? Rs 88,000 crore is the army's revenue budget. The CCS kept clearing projects worth Rs 50,000 crore to Rs 1,00,000 crore but where is the actual money? So you have to be selective. I have cleared a Rs 48,000-crore project for seven stealth frigates (P-17A), but I have factored in when the money will be required and at what stage.

Q. Are you satisfied with infrastructure in forward areas and the role of the Border Roads Organisation?

A. Much more needs to be done. Environmental clearances have come in 64 cases. But I will be able to take the issue head on only when we are in a position to deliver in terms of roads. BRO is now in the process of outsourcing. Government machinery, the BRO in particular, has never developed the technique of outsourcing. They are very poor outsourcers. They do not have conceptual clarity on outsourcing. We are in touch with the Confederation of Indian Industry and may appoint consultants to push it.

Q. Can you elaborate on proposed changes in the new defence procurement policy?

A. Different issues are being tackled separately and we are close to coming close to a conclusion. I think 8 or 9 main issues (including blacklisting and allowing agents) have been discussed extensively and decision-making is in an advanced stage. I am forming a committee that will go through all this material and do a final round of interaction (with stakeholders). It will then write a Defence Procurement Procedure which will be published after the ministry vets it.

Q. The Prime Minister has talked about skills as part of defence offsets but your ministry says skills cannot be a part of offsets.

A. It can be. They are going by what is written there. But if we change that, the same people will say it is possible. Currently, there is a ban on services in offsets as someone used services to give kickbacks. I intend to take it up at the next meeting of the defence acquisition council and lift the ban on services.

Q. What are your expectations from your visit to South Korea (April 15-19)?

A. The Prime Minister will be visiting Korea in May. The idea is to discuss some issues so that some agreements can be finalised and signed during the Prime Minister's visit. The Koreans excel in areas such as shipbuilding, electronics and metallurgy. They have also shown interest in the Make in India programme.

Q. The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has been without a chief for more than 2 months? What about appointing chief of defence staff?

A. The selection process for the new DRDO chief is on and will happen soon. DRDO will play a key role in boosting the Make in India programme. We will encourage it to tie up with the local industry in the development phase. As for creation of the post of chief of defence staff or permanent chairman of the chiefs of staff committee, I will take up that issue after two months as I already have my hands full with other issues. We do intend to create that post but if I take up everything together I will not be able to do anything.

Q. Coming back to the Rafale deal, you said your predecessor had himself put a question mark on it.

A. The previous defence minister had written that after the price negotiation is done, L1 should be verified again. But it did not come to that stage as it got stuck up because of interpretation of whether to take French man-hours into consideration for building the plane or Indian man-hours, which is 2.7 times the French number. I have not gone into too much detail on that, but my officers have expressed reservations about this 2.7-hour formula for local manufacturing.
 
.
Why should we buy F-16 when the USAF are not buying them anymore. Plus it is used by PAF too so it may not be a good option for India.
Personally I think that we have Invested a lot in LCA and if we are going for 200-250 aircrafts it should be only tejas..SAAB Gripen is just not the right ans. for a light combat fighter jet.

Why not purchase F-16 ?

Both PAF and IAF are using Mi-17 helicopters, Il-78 aerial tankers.
 
.
Why not purchase F-16 ?

Both PAF and IAF are using Mi-17 helicopters, Il-78 aerial tankers.
Mi-17 is a transport helicopter, II-78 is a tanker, both are non-combat machines. We need superior platform for aerial combat.
 
.
India has no "Riches" if they had any they wouldn't have dragged the negotiations for more than a decade and then ordered just 36, even that is not confirmed yet.
 
.
Can you just buy a damn plane now. I am sick of these self ego stroking news stories.
 
.
Aq to prasun sengupta india may buy 189 rafales which will be kit assemble by realince and mahindra at 14 per annum.
He also told GENERAL QN DESERVE GEN ANS.WHAT PARRIKAR HINTED WAS UPCOMING HAWK MK132AJT WITH GUNPOD LIGHT WT. AIR TO GROUND RICKETS COULD UNDERTAKE CLOSE AIR SUPPORT MISSION. EVERYTHING ABT. GRIPEN IS MISCHIEVOUS SPECULATION.

he may nt be right but many time his speculation became reality.
 
.
I Really don't understand the logic behind getting a new light weight fighter. It would be better to devote that money (or a part may be) and accelerate LCA Mk 2 development and induction, even if it requires foreign consultancy. having another machine (6-7 squadrons at most) will come with whole new set of problems of maintenance, spares inventory, Flight simulator requirements etc.
It won't be a bad idea to ask a private consortium to set up assembly lines for Tejas, which can help getting more planes in service quickly while relieving HAL of some load. These lines in future can be use for LCA Mk 2 as well by upgrading.
 
.
I Really don't understand the logic behind getting a new light weight fighter. It would be better to devote that money (or a part may be) and accelerate LCA Mk 2 development and induction, even if it requires foreign consultancy. having another machine (6-7 squadrons at most) will come with whole new set of problems of maintenance, spares inventory, Flight simulator requirements etc.
It won't be a bad idea to ask a private consortium to set up assembly lines for Tejas, which can help getting more planes in service quickly while relieving HAL of some load. These lines in future can be use for LCA Mk 2 as well by upgrading.
Well the issue is that only .. G lobby t came in wanting to improve the 'LCA' by providing aerodynamic data and other consultancy support in a hangar.proposing their contribution from 51 % in Mk-2, 100 % for G itself under Make In India. So foreign consultancy is a big issue. Even Dassault wont help us much unless there is a firm sizeable orders for it and a commitment from french govt perhaps to help in LCA MK2. Its not a bad move from them as finally they wish to showcase and win contratcs for their own developmed bird before thinking for certain JVs /consulting like say LCA project.

in my personal opinion, I would have love to see LCA project itself becoming a make in india project under a consortium of companies inlcuidng say HAL and the rest of major pvt companies like Reliance, Tata, Mahindra, L&T etc . This would have given the pvt sector a different first hand experience on aerospace sector. This will also help other company to understand how MII will work for them too when they tie up to produce birds in india

Also it would have broken up HAL monopoly.
HAL needs to become efficient over time. IF privatising LCA and its future variants is a way then do it. We need timebound approach to LCA project
 
.
Bring Gripen in, then buy out the entire company. Our LCA looks like shit.....India still manufactures planes with 50's tech!
 
. .
Mi-17 is a transport helicopter, II-78 is a tanker, both are non-combat machines. We need superior platform for aerial combat.

F-16IN is superior to block 52s in each and every sense....

Its like comparing Maruti 800 and Dzire.
 
.
India has no "Riches" if they had any they wouldn't have dragged the negotiations for more than a decade and then ordered just 36, even that is not confirmed yet.
Just check our other deals with French you might get an idea that all your talking is nothing more than rants

Compare then with yours you will get am idea you are far behind
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom