What's new

Fearing China, India pulls out of war games with US, Japan

Correction shell shocked after 1962

After the debacle of 1962, nothing could have enhanced the self esteem of the Indian Army than the mauling that was given to the Chinese at Nathu La in Sikkim on 11th September 1967 and at Chola on 1st October 1967. It must have come as a rude shock to the Chinese Army and also its political leadership. And by a happy coincidence, the Indian Army leadership which got the better of this eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation was the same that went on to create Bangladesh in 1971. Maj Gen Sagat Singh was GOC Mountain Division in Sikkim, Lt Gen Jagjit Aurora was the Corps Commander and Sam Manekshaw was the Eastern Army Commander.

I too served in Nathu La. After finishing my young officer’s course, it was on 21 July 1967 that I reported to my Unit, a mule pack artillery regiment in Sikkim. Those days young officers were made to have their professional mailing by sending them on long-range patrols (LRP) for area familiarisation, take part in khad race to increase their stamina and sending them to remote observations ports on Sikkim-Tibet border for a month. Having done my share of LRPs and having taken part in the khad race, I was sent to the main Sabu La observation post on the Sikkim-Tibet Border. This observation post is about a kilometre south-west of Nathu La. It dominates Nathu La by virtue of taking on higher ground and commands an excellent view of the pass as also the Chinese defense on the feature known as North shoulder. There were two observation posts at Sabu La and had a good old radio set 62 and PRC-10 and of course line communications to the guns deployed in the rear.

Nathu La at 14200 feet is an important pass on the Tibet-Sikkim border through which passes the old Gangtok-Yatung-Lhasa Trade Route. Although the Sikkim-Tibet boundary is well defined by the Anglo-Chinese Convention of 17 March 1890, the Chinese were not comfortable with Sikkim being an Indian protectorate with the deployment of the Indian Army at that time. During the 1965 War between India and Pakistan, the Chinese gave an ultimatum to India to vacate both Nathu La and Jelep La passes on the Sikkim-Tibet border. For some strange reason, the Mountain Division, under whose jurisdiction Jelep La was at that time, vacated the pass. It remains under Chinese possession till date. However, Lt. Gen Sagat Singh, true to form, refused to vacate Nathu La. Incidentally it is at Nathu La where Chinese and Indian forces are deployed barely thirty yards apart, closest anywhere on the 4000 km Sino-Indian border and the border remains undemacrated. Chinese hold the northern shoulder of the pass while Indian Army holds the southern shoulder. Two dominating features south and north of Nathu La namely Sebu La and Camel’s back were held by the Indians. Artillery observation post officers deployed on these two features have an excellent observation into Chinese depth areas whereas from Northern shoulder, Chinese have very little observations into Indian depth areas. This factor proved crucial in the clash that ensued. At the time of the clash, 2 Grenadiers was holding Nathu La. This battalion was under the command of Lt Col (Later Brigadier) Rai Singh. The battalion was under the Mountain Brigade being commanded by Brig MMS Bakshi, MVC.

The daily routine at Nathu La used to start with patrolling by both sides along the perceived border which almost always resulted in arguments. The only one on the Chinese side who could converse in broken English was the Political Commissar who could be recognised by a red patch on his cap. Sentries of both the forces used to stand barely one meter apart in the centre of the Pass which is marked by Nehru Stone, commemorating Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru’s trek to Bhutan through Nathu La and Chumbi Valley in 1959. Argument between the two sides soon changed to pushing and shoving and on 6 September 1967 a scuffle took place in which Political Commissar fell down and broke his spectacles. These incidents only added to the excitement. I developed excellent rapport with Capt Dagar of 2 Grenadiers and a few days before the clash we had gone to Gangtok together on “liberty” to see a movie. Little did I know that within a week, Dagar would be a martyr.

In order to de-escalate the situation it was decided by the Indian military hierarchy to lay a wire in the centre of the Pass from Nathu La to Sebu La to demarcate the perceived border. This task was to be carried out by the jawans of 70 Field Company of Engineers assisted by a company of 18 Rajput deployed at Yak La pass further north of Nathu La. The wire laying was to commence at first light on the fateful morning of 11 September 1967.

That morning dawned bright and sunny unlike the normal foggy days. The engineers and jawans started erecting long iron pickets from Nathu La to Sebu La along the perceived border while 2 Grenadiers and Artillery Observation Post Officers at Sebu La and Camel’s Back were on alert. Immediately the Chinese Political Commissar, with a section of Infantry came to the centre of the Pass where Lt. Col Rai Singh, CO 2 Grenadiers was standing with his commando platoon. The Commissar asked Lt Col Rai Singh to stop laying the wire. Orders to the Indian Army were clear. They were not to blink. An argument started which soon built up into a scuffle. In the ensuing melee, the commissar got roughed up. Thereafter the Chinese went up back to their bunkers and engineers resumed laying the wire.

Within a few minutes of this, a whistle was heard on the Chinese side followed by murderous medium machine gun fire from north shoulder. The pass is completely devoid of cover and the jawans of 70 Field Company and 18 Rajput were caught in the open and suffered heavy casualties which included Col Rai Singh who was wounded. He was awarded MVC later. Two brave officers – Capt Dagar of 2 Grenadiers and Major Harbhajan Singh of 18 Rajput rallied a few troops and tried to assault the Chinese MMG but both died a heroic death. They were posthumously awarded Vir Chakra and MVC respectively. 2 Grenadier opened small arms fire on North shoulder but it was not very effective. Within the first ten minutes, there were nearly seventy dead and scores wounded lying in the open on the pass. Within half an hour, Chinese artillery opened up on the pass as well as in the depth areas but it was mostly prophylactic fire due to lack of observation and failed to do much damage. Meanwhile we as artillery observation post officers asked for artillery fire, permission for which came a little later. Because of excellent domination and observation from Sebu La and Camel’s back, artillery fire was most effective and most of the Chinese bunkers on North shoulder and in depth were completely destroyed and Chinese suffered very heavy casualties which by their own estimates were over 400. The artillery duel thereafter carried on day and night. For the next three days, the Chinese were taught a lesson. On 14 September, Chinese threatened use of Air Force if shelling did not stop. By then the lesson had been driven home and an uneasy ceasefire came about. The Chinese, true to form, had pulled over dead bodies to their side of the perceived border at night and accused us of violating the border. Dead bodies were exchanged on 15 September at which time: Sam Manekshaw, Aurora and Sagat were present on the Pass.

Every battle has its own share of heroism, faint heartedness, drama and humour. The Nathu La skirmish was no exception. 2 Grenadiers were initially shaken up due to the loss of Capt Dagar and injury to their CO but found their man of the moment in Lieutenant Atar Singh who went round from trench to trench to rally the troops and was later promoted as Captain on the spot. On the lighter side was one artillery observation post officer, my colleague at Sebu La whose radio set was damaged due to shelling and he was out of communication with his guns. He rightly decided to go back to the base at Sherathang in the depth to get another radio set. While he was on his way back, Commander Artillery Brigade was coming up. He stopped the young captain, accused him of running away from the battle and sent him back after reducing him to his substantive rank of a second lieutenant. Casualties could not be evacuated for three days and nights as any move to do so invited a hail of Chinese bullets. Some wounded may well have succumbed to cold and rain. There were awards for bravery as also court martial for cowardice. However, what stood out was the steadfastness of the commanders and bravery of the jawans and junior officers. Indians refused to blink and the mighty Chinese dragon was made to look ordinary.

The situation again flared up twenty days later when on 1 October 1967 a face-off between India and China took place at Cho La, another pass on the Sikkim-Tibet border a few kilometers north of Nathu La. Despite initial casualties, 7/11 GR and 10 JAK RIF stood firm and forced the Chinese to withdraw nearly three kilometers away to a feature named Kam Barracks where they remain deployed till date. Cho La Pass is firmly in Indian hands. Indian Army had got better of the Chinese yet again.

No wonder, Sino-Indian border has remained peaceful ever since to the extent that today Chinese soldiers come and ask their Indian counterparts at Nathu La for cigarettes, rum and tea, mail is exchanged twice in a week in a hut constructed specially for this purpose and border personnel meeting takes place there twice a year. It was my privilege to command the Nathu La Brigade many years later and conduct the first border personnel meeting at Nathu La is 1995.

(Maj Gen Sheru Thapliyal, SM (Retd), commanded the Nathu La Brigade and an Infantry Division in the Ladakh Sector)
 
Concerned at how it would be perceived by Beijing, India last month suddenly withdrew from the planning of a naval exercise with the US and Japanese navies off the US Pacific island of Guam.



Instead, India will stick to geopolitically less sensitive separate naval manoeuvres with the US and Japan.

US and Japanese naval officials visited India last month to discuss coordination for the trilateral exercise.

The Indian defence ministry first indicated a preference for holding the exercise off the coast of the Japanese island of Okinawa.


Then it took the view that war games should be kept to the bilateral level for the time being in deference to Chinese sensibilities. The ministry then withdrew from the discussion altogether.

"Bizarrely, the US and Japan discussed a naval exercise on Indian soil that India was boycotting," said a US defence consultant.

Beijing claims multilateral naval exercises between India, the US and Japan are aimed at containing its influence and has publicly warned all the governments against joining such exercises.

Australia's withdrawal from the Quad after 2007 was a fallout of these protests.

The US and Japan had hoped to give the Malabar label to the Guam exercises, echoing the 2009 Malabar naval actions.

Tokyo saw this as paving the way to recreating the so-called "Quad" naval exercise of 2007 which saw five navies participate.

Australia last year indicated its interest in rejoining. Indian officials say that they are only interested in bilateral naval exercises and that Malabar should be confined to exercises with the US in the Indian Ocean.

This year's Malabar exercise, if held at all, will be a bare bones Indo-US affair in the Arabian Sea later in November. Officials say even this may not happen as both governments keep pushing the date back.

"The dates of Malabar are still to be finalised and depends on the commitments of the Fifth Fleet's engagement in the Gulf," said an Indian Navy official.

The Indian withdrawal from the trilateral exercise occurred before the Chinese border intrusion in eastern Ladakh.

Fearing China, India pulls out of war games with US, Japan - Hindustan Times


Again, this is not being coward...it is called being matured and responsible. India and so does responsible Chinese understands mutual friendship and trade is necessary. It is a trust building gesture from India.
India is a self reliable country and can protect itself, they don't have to beg for help from the USA, neither should they be their patsy.
 
China's really looking at aggressive military policy against India . Seems the Gov is cowed by mighty China. But in a practical question , what options does India have . Gov. change ? Foreign policy change ? Change in RoE ? Be more staunch and aggresive itself in its Military approach ? Strengthen Indo-US ties ? Keep backing away ?

Is India looking for options? Or does she like to remain a rag doll of the West to be used as they like? China has been known to have asked India again and again to square out the McMahon Line. The British colonials and the semi-independent Chinese govt of the time were not legitimate authorities to draw up an international boundary between free India and free China. Therefore, India needs to come to the table with a fresh mind. And India has to declare in unequivocal terms that she recognizes that Tibet is a province of PRC.
 
Everyone are talking about spineless govt. But nobody noticed the fact, that China agreed to pull off from Ladakh, the day after MMS increased his stay in Japan by a day, without any official engagements. It rang alarm bell in China, and next day we saw the result.
India too plays diplomacy cunningly.
 
Everyone are talking about spineless govt. But nobody noticed the fact, that China agreed to pull off from Ladakh, the day after MMS increased his stay in Japan by a day, without any official engagements. It rang alarm bell in China, and next day we saw the result.
India too plays diplomacy cunningly.

There was no need to pull out of this exercise to placate the Chinese.
 
There was no need to pull out of this exercise to placate the Chinese.

I accept there was no need. We are also slowly coming out of vietnam. We need to show more steel. But i just meant to say, sometimes India does play diplomatic hardball,.
 
India is a toothless ''tiger'':lol:

Instead of that you should have said something about Indian politicians, especially about the ones in MMS govt. But overlooking the truth in your eagerness to bash India is an inherent trait which seems difficult for you to overcome.
 
Did China ever care about how India perceives Chinese military assistance to Pakistan or the military exercises for that matter? No. Then why should we care about what China thinks? They can do a string of pearls or whatever, but we have to be "concerned" about how China would perceive our participation in the exercise. Ridiculous!!!

The govt. is just concerned about its survival, the nation can go to hell. Useless, self serving politicians.
There was absolutely no need of pulling out of these war games.
 
Ak antony: We will go ahead with the war games with US and japan.

Call from PM sing: hello, just now Mr. Xi Xing Ping called me and told me that china may not be able to provide spares, parts & equipment for our 100% indigenous DRDO products. I begged him to release the fire proof bricks for our indigenous Air craft carrier , but he said that is also not possible. :fie:

Ak Antony: Ehhh....really what will happen now. Even for the exercise we would need Made in china parts, ammunition, bullets, electronics etc.

PM sing: Don't tell me. I even called Modi to get some advice but he fainted hearing the name of chinese premier Xing ping.

Ak Antony: May be we have to give up on the exercise. It was a provocative move anyway inline with our traditional chanakyan ideology of ''screw the neighbor'' doctrine.

PM sing: U are right. It would have been a humiliation in front of the JSDN and USN any way when they would have seen our hyped up super duper Naval power. Best is to take an face saving amicable leave.

AK Antony: Ok I will now call the Japanese premier and let him know about our decision.

Just then incoming call from Japanese PM Abe: Hello, mr Antony well...eh ... what to say. Our naval officers want to shift the the proposed exercise due to technical difficulties arising suddenly.

Ak antony: No problemo, I also wanted to tell U the same thing just now. Good that U called. We can go for the exercise in an amicable time.

AK antony and PM sing huffs as a sign of relief​
.

Japanese PM after getting off the phone: What the hell were U thinking Mr. Obama (obama sitting next to him). I don't want my naval soldiers to learn how to run away seeing chinese troops. What could possibly we have learned from exercising with bollywood kids. Japan is still the legacy of samurai worriers not headless chickens. :pissed:

Obama: Well U have a point, but U see Indians live in a delusion of being a hyper power and in trying to take india in my Asian pivot scheme, I wanted to test them. Seem they chickened out. It was expected though. :undecided:

Japanese PM: U know these exercises are just show and ultimately we both have to accede to china's legitimate security and territorial concerns. :smokin:

Obama: well we both have something to show our electorate back home. Some sabre rattling and show off is not a bad idea. Chinese understand this and so do we.

Japanese PM: I agree but then again don't call navies from whom the only thing we can learn is how to run with tail between our legs.

Obama: Well this is a good experience.

Meanwhile Modi is still sleeping and shivering for some reason. :sleep:
 
Ak antony: We will go ahead with the war games with US and japan.

Call from PM sing: hello, just now Mr. Xi Xing Ping called me and told me that china may not be able to provide spares, parts & equipment for our 100% indigenous DRDO products. I begged him to release the fire proof bricks for our indigenous Air craft carrier , but he said that is also not possible. :fie:

Ak Antony: Ehhh....really what will happen now. Even for the exercise we would need Made in china parts, ammunition, bullets, electronics etc.

PM sing: Don't tell me. I even called Modi to get some advice but he fainted hearing the name of chinese premier Xing ping.

Ak Antony: May be we have to give up on the exercise. It was a provocative move anyway inline with our traditional chanakyan ideology of ''screw the neighbor'' doctrine.

PM sing: U are right. It would have been a humiliation in front of the JSDN and USN any way when they would have seen our hyped up super duper Naval power. Best is to take an face saving amicable leave.

AK Antony: Ok I will now call the Japanese premier and let him know about our decision.

Just then incoming call from Japanese PM Abe: Hello, mr Antony well...eh ... what to say. Our naval officers want to shift the the proposed exercise due to technical difficulties arising suddenly.

Ak antony: No problemo, I also wanted to tell U the same thing just now. Good that U called. We can go for the exercise in an amicable time.

AK antony and PM sing huffs as a sign of relief​
.

Japanese PM after getting off the phone: What the hell were U thinking Mr. Obama (obama sitting next to him). I don't want my naval soldiers to learn how to run away seeing chinese troops. What could possibly we have learned from exercising with bollywood kids. Japan is still the legacy of samurai worriers not headless chickens. :pissed:

Obama: Well U have a point, but U see Indians live in a delusion of being a hyper power and in trying to take india in my Asian pivot scheme, I wanted to test them. Seem they chickened out. It was expected though. :undecided:

Japanese PM: U know these exercises are just show and ultimately we both have to accede to china's legitimate security and territorial concerns. :smokin:

Obama: well we both have something to show our electorate back home. Some sabre rattling and show off is not a bad idea. Chinese understand this and so do we.

Japanese PM: I agree but then again don't call navies from whom the only thing we can learn is how to run with tail between our legs.

Obama: Well this is a good experience.

Meanwhile Modi is still sleeping and shivering for some reason. :sleep:

LMAO!! Post of the year.
 
Back
Top Bottom