Outside of the west you dothead mofooutside of USA there was no shootings
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Outside of the west you dothead mofooutside of USA there was no shootings
Why don't you check, are you my father? Why should I spoon feed you, go use google. In Canada you cannot go stark naked as you want to?Please check the laws of Canada before you engage with me further.
I first assumed this guy was an Indian but then people told he’s Pakistani. I met more like him with the same mentality. Just POS!Why don't you check, are you my father? In Canada you cannot go stark naked as you want to?
Nope. Please close your eyes. Or look the other way. Your choice.
Are you stupid? Ahmed Deedat was a well-known Muslim who gave Dawah. You are a hypocrite Muslim who has heretical views. You should be the last to call Ahmed Deedat anything you idiot.
You are an idiot.
Question: is it better to be covered or go naked. It is better to be covered. Your argument is flawed.
In the bikini vs. Burka debate, the Burka is better.
Ah Even a thong in public? lol.
No point in debating with a hypocritical Muslim like yourself. Because you have a flawed logic.
You are a hypocritical heretical Muslim who is also supposedly a communist. lol. No point in arguing with idiots such as yourself.How can you post a ridiculous female's photo and ask me to turn my eyes away ? There's no delete option in the brain.
No, Deedat fellow was the idiot. He would even have told off this non-burqa'ed free Libyan girl from 2011, and she in turn would have told him off :
I am the most one on this forum to correct notions of Islam among members and inform them about actual philosophy of Islam. These thread for instance :
prenups in indian weddings and islam
The sacrament of prenups Deccan Chronicle | Audrey D’Mello | December 07, 2015, 07.27 am IST Representational image. Maneka Gandhi, minister of women and child development, recently gave a call for prenuptial agreements to be recognised in India. According to her, if the terms for division...defence.pkthe comfortable muslims of yesteryears and the pious muslims of now
Islamic Socialism: A history from left to right Nadeem F. Paracha — Published Feb 21, 2013 07:40am Between the 1950s and early 1970s, a powerful ideology in the Muslim world galvanised itself from the minds and fringes of modern Islamic intellectualism and made its way into the mainstream...defence.pk
Of course it is good to be reasonably covered but burqa, bikini, thong in public... Nothing in between ??? Why are you being unreasonable ? And I have told you that the burqa is a pre-Islamic, anti-Islamic Jewish garment so why do you persist ? I have also told you that India is full of burqas - the most in the world, yet the voluntary-burqa'ed didn't see any increase in intelligence or health immunity, so why do you persist ?
I only make simple questions and simple points.
You are a hypocritical heretical Muslim who is also supposedly a communist. lol. No point in arguing with idiots such as yourself.
During the same period (1920s-30s), another (though lesser known) Islamic scholar in undivided India got smitten by the 1917 Russian revolution and Marxism.
Hafiz Rahman Sihwarwl saw Islam and Marxism sharing five elements in common: (1) prohibition of the accumulation of wealth in the hands of the privileged classes (2) organisation of the economic structure of the state to ensure social welfare (3) equality of opportunity for all human beings (4) priority of collective social interest over individual privilege and (5) prevention of the permanentising of class structure through social revolution.
The motivations for many of these themes he drew from the Qur’an, which he understood as seeking to create an economic order in which the rich pay excessive, though voluntary taxes (Zakat) to minimise differences in living standards.
In the areas that Sihwarwl saw Islam and communism diverge were Islam’s sanction of private ownership within certain limits, and in its refusal to recognise an absolutely classless basis of society.
He suggested that Islam, with its prohibition of the accumulation of wealth, is able to control the class structure through equality of opportunity.
Basically, both Sindhi and Sihwarwl had stumbled upon an Islamic concept of the social democratic welfare state.
Building upon the initial thoughts of Sindhi and Sihwarwl were perhaps South Asia’s two most ardent and articulate supporters and theoreticians of Islamic Socilaism: Ghulam Ahmed Parvez and Dr. Khalifa Abdul Hakim.
Parvez was a prominent ‘Quranist’, or an Islamic scholar who insisted that for the Muslims to make progress in the modern world, Islamic thought and laws should be entirely based on the modern interpretations of the Qu’ran and on the complete rejection of the hadith (sayings of the Prophet and his companions based on hearsay and compiled over a 100 years after the Prophet’s demise).
After studying traditional Muslim texts, as well as Sufism, Parvez claimed that almost all hadiths were fabrications by those who wanted Islam to seem like an intolerant faith and by ancient Muslim kings who used these hadiths to give divine legitimacy to their tyrannical rules.
Parvez also insisted that Muslims should spend more time studying the modern sciences instead of wasting their energies on fighting out ancient sectarian conflicts or ignoring the true egalitarian and enlightening spirit of the Qu’ran by indulging in multiple rituals handed down to them by ancient ulema, clerics and compilers of the hadith.
Understandably, Parvez was right away attacked by conservative Islamic scholars and political outfits.
But this didn’t stop famous Muslim philosopher and poet, Muhammad Iqbal, to befriend the young scholar and then introduce him to the future founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
Jinnah appointed Parvez to edit a magazine, Talu-e-Islam. It was set-up to propagate the creation of a separate Muslim country and to also answer the attacks that Jinnah’s All India Muslim League had begun to face from conservative Islamic parties and ulema who accused the League of being a pseudo-Muslim organisation and Jinnah for being too westernised and ‘lacking correct Islamic behavior.’
Apart from continuing to author books and commentaries on the Qu’ran, Parvez wrote a series of articles in Talu-e-Islam that propagated a more socialistic view of the holy book.
In a series of essays for the magazine he used verses from the Qu’ran, incidents from the faith’s history and insights from the writings of Muhammad Iqbal to claim:
The clergy and conservative ulema have hijacked Islam.
They are agents of the rich people and promoters of uncontrolled Capitalism.
Socialism best enforces Qur’anic dictums on property, justice and distribution of wealth.
Islam’s main mission was the eradication of all injustices and cruelties from society. It was a socio-economic movement, and the Prophet was a leader seeking to put an end to the capitalist exploitation of the Quraysh merchants and the corrupt bureaucracy of Byzantium and Persia.
According to the Qur’an, Muslims have three main responsibilities: seeing, hearing and sensing through the agency of the mind. Consequently, real knowledge is based on empirically verifiable observation, or through the role of science.
Poverty is the punishment of God and deserved by those who ignore science.
In Muslim/Islamic societies, science, as well as agrarian reform should play leading roles in developing an industrialised economy.
A socialist path is a correction of the medieval distortion of Islam through Shari’a.
Parvez joined the government after the creation of Pakistan in 1947, but after Jinnah’s death in 1948, he was sidelined until he resigned from his post in 1956.
I used to be a member here. Why should I tell you, get lost you confused heretical Muslim and also a hypocrite.Ah, you know me. So what was your previous member name ?
Secondly, since you ignored the second thread of mine I will quote a section from it in the hope that you will change your mind. This is from a 100 years ago :
How can you post a ridiculous female's photo and ask me to turn my eyes away ?
I used to be a member here. Why should I tell you, get lost you confused heretical Muslim and also a hypocrite.
It is easy. Just navigate away from the page. You know, just like changing the channel on the TV when you see something you do not want to watch. Or you do want to watch it, in which case look at that photo all you want. See how that works?
Haha don't make a mockery of yourself here. The Golden Age of Islam were done by devout Muslims, not hypocritical heretics like yourself.I am neither confused nor hypocritical nor a heretic. It was Muslims like me who built the Islamic Golden Age and it was people like you who destroyed it. I, a Communist Muslim, am the ultimate expression of Islam. You didn't even read my linked threads to counter me.
I told you, there's no delete option in the brain.
I told you, there's no delete option in the brain.
Yeah but I am not stupid enough to tell someone "close your eyes, when a person is naked." according to your flawed logic and reasoning.In your brain. I have no control over it. Just as you do not control my mind. Or anyone else's.
Haha don't make a mockery of yourself here. The Golden Age of Islam were done by devout Muslims, not hypocritical heretics like yourself.
In your brain. I have no control over it. Just as you do not control my mind. Or anyone else's.
Yeah but I am not stupid enough to tell someone "close your eyes, when a person is naked." according to your flawed logic and reasoning.
it is the naked person who needs to be covered, not the eyes that need to be shut.
My eyes have more rights to be open to see, than a person to go stark naked you illogical moron.
Outside of the west you dothead mofo