What's new

Far-right settler rabbi: Paris attacks are payback for the Holocaust

Dubious

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
37,717
Reaction score
80
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The quote from Dov Lior, the chief rabbi of the Israeli settlement of Kiryat Arba, was first reported by the Walla! news agency.
ShowImage.ashx


Rabbi Dov Lior. (photo credit:Courtesy)


A religious Zionist cleric from a Jewish settlement on the West Bank told mourners on Saturday during the funeral of an Israeli father and son gunned down by Palestinian terrorists that the attacks in Paris were deserved due to what Europeans "did to our people 70 years ago."

The quote from Dov Lior, the chief rabbi of the Israeli settlement of Kiryat Arba, was first reported by the Walla! news agency.

"The wicked ones in blood-soaked Europe deserve it for what they did to our people 70 years ago," Lior said.

The controversial rabbi once wrote an approbation for a book called The King’s Torah that was co-written in 2009 by radical settler figure Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, which permitted killing civilian non-Jews in times of war.

He was summoned by police for questioning on grounds of incitement to violence but refused to report for questioning, saying the Torah was not open to police investigation. He was subsequently arrested and brought for questioning but no charges were made.

Last year, Lior published a letter saying that Jewish law permits destroying the entire Gaza Strip to bring peace to the south of the country.

Lior said that he had received questions about whether Jewish law permits harming a civilian population not directly involved with the combatants.

He first cited the opinion of the Maharal of Prague, a renowned 16th-century rabbi, who wrote that a nation under attack can wage a fierce war against the assaulting nation, and that it is not obligated regarding the safety of people who are personally involved in hostilities.

At a time of war, the nation under attack is allowed to punish the enemy population with measures it finds suitable, such as blocking supplies or electricity, as well as shelling the entire area according to the army minister’s judgment, and not to needlessly endanger soldiers but rather to take crushing deterring steps to exterminate the enemy,” Lior wrote.

Addressing the hostilities with Hamas, the rabbi continued to say that “in the case of Gaza, it would be permitted for the defense minister to even order the destruction of all of Gaza so that the South will no longer suffer and to prevent injury to our people, who have been suffering for so long from the enemies surrounding us.”

Talk of humanitarianism and consideration are nothing when weighed against saving our brothers in the South and across the country and the restoration of quiet to our land,” he said.

Far-right settler rabbi: Paris attacks are payback for the Holocaust - Israel News - Jerusalem Post


No one tweeting hate spewing venom on this guy? No one asking Israel to apologize for the hatred? No one calling Judaism foul...Interesting!


Same country (France) that has this is spitted at by the Jew himself:

In France, the Gayssot Act, voted for on July 13, 1990, makes it illegal to question the existence of crimes that fall in the category of crimes against humanity as defined in the London Charter of 1945, on the basis of which Nazi leaders were convicted by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945-46. When the act was challenged by Robert Faurisson, the Human Rights Committee upheld it as a necessary means to counter possible antisemitism. In 2012, the Constitutional Council of France ruled that to extend the Gayssot Act to the Armenian Genocide denial was unconstitutional because it violated the freedom of speech.

LAW No 90-615 to repress acts of racism, anti-semitism and xenophobia (1990)
MODIFICATIONS OF THE LAW OF JULY 29, 1881 ON THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS Art 8. - Article 24 of the Law on the Freedom of the Press of 29 July 1881 is supplemented by the following provisions: In the event of judgment for one of the facts envisaged by the preceding subparagraph, the court will be able moreover to order: Except when the responsibility for the author of the infringement is retained on the base for article 42 and the first subparagraph for article 43 for this law or the first three subparagraphs for article 93-3 for the law No 82-652 for July 29, 1982 on the audio-visual communication, the deprivation of the rights enumerated to the 2o and 3o of article 42 of the penal code for imprisonment of five years maximum;

Art 9. – As an amendment to Article 24 of the law of July 29, 1881 on the freedom of the press, article 24 (a) is as follows written: <<Art. 24 (a). - those who have disputed the existence of one or more crimes against humanity such as they are defined by Article 6 of the statute of the international tribunal military annexed in the agreement of London of August 8, 1945 and which were a carried out either by the members of an organization declared criminal pursuant to Article 9 of the aforementioned statute, or by a person found guilty such crimes by a French or international jurisdiction shall be punished by one month to one year's imprisonment or a fine.

Art 13. - It is inserted, after article 48-1 of the law of July 29, 1881 on the freedom of the press, article 48-2 thus written: <<Art. 48-2. - publication or publicly expressed opinion encouraging those to whom it is addressed to pass a favourable moral judgment on one or more crimes against humanity and tending to justify these crimes (including collaboration) or vindicate their perpetrators shall be punished by one to five years' imprisonment or a fine.
 
. . . . . .
I wonder what bhai @Solomon2 has to say about the Zionist Nazis Terrorist.
First, there's a pretty strong Talmudic injunction against punishing the kids of criminals. Consequently, Lior does not here advocate killing Frenchmen: he's saying the French "deserved" what they got for what they did seventy years ago.

Even for me, who lost an uncle because the French deported him to Auschwitz, that seems harsh and overly generalized. France had been occupied by the Nazis. Many French tried protecting Jews - especially French Jews - and even helped others escape.

Rather, the French took this course when they first excused Arab Nazi collaborators after WWII, then decided to side with anti-Zionists after the Six-Day War. Apparently, DeGaulle's idea was for France to gather cheap Arab labor and thus strengthen France economically, seeing what Germany did after WWII by importing Turks; the only price paid was to endorse antisemitism. However, Germany realized that its Turks had to remain "guest workers" under state regulation, whereas the French have thought that Arabs could be re-shaped, via the education system, into Gauls.

Second, many - perhaps most - Muslims today find it difficult to state under what circumstances it is morally correct for non-Muslims to kill those professing to be Muslims. It's not something Pakistanis like to deal with, yes?
 
Last edited:
.
SO he is just like al bagdadi who has PHD in Islamic studies from one of the most reputed universities in this subject "Islamic University of Baghdad" and knows more about Islam than OP .

Just goes on to prove religion is for retards and the same person who was screaming from the top of her lungs that ISIS attackers were not muslim did not take a millisecond to see the other side .

Enjoy your religion while i enjoy my champagne and rationalism .
 
.
advocate killing Frenchmen here: he's saying the French "deserved"
we also dont advocate but we condemn unlike this guy :unsure:

they did seventy years ago.
wow still haunted by the past?

Muslims today find it difficult to state under what circumstances it is morally correct for non-Muslims to kill those professing to be Muslims. It's not something Pakistanis like to deal with, yes?
There is no such thing as morally correct to kill for anyone under anything!
 
. .
SO he is just like al bagdadi who has PHD in Islamic studies from one of the most reputed universities in this subject "Islamic University of Baghdad" and knows more about Islam than OP .

Just goes on to prove religion is for retards and the same person who was screaming from the top of her lungs that ISIS attackers were not muslim did not take a millisecond to see the other side .

Enjoy your religion while i enjoy my champagne and rationalism .
interesting


Lets see You seemed to have missed this!
religious Zionist cleric from a Jewish settlement on the West Bank
 
.
we also dont advocate but we condemn unlike this guy :unsure:
Like yourself most of the Jews also condemned this attack. This guy may be an exception.

Besides he is not even a "real" Zionist Jew . :disagree:

"Real" Zionist Jews are all peace loving citizens. :agree:

Regards
 
.
we also dont advocate but we condemn unlike this guy :unsure:
"Condemn" as in vocal - not in deed, for Pakistan shelters and nurtures many demons.

wow still haunted by the past?
My parents were saved. Not my grandparents, nor four-fifths of my aunts, uncles, and cousins. What do you think?

There is no such thing as morally correct to kill for anyone under anything!
Why does Pakistan still have its blasphemy laws on the books, then?
 
.
"Condemn" as in vocal - not in deed, for Pakistan shelters and nurtures many demons.
Thread isnt about Pakistan

This guy isnt even condemning in vocal forget deeds!

So israel is adopting our laws? What has this to do with israel and this hate monger in OP?

This guy may be an exception.
he is a chief Rabbi!
the chief rabbi of the Israeli settlement of Kiryat Arba
not even a "real" Zionist Jew .
Yea he isnt you are prob more zionist than him! :tup:
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom