What's new

Exclusive: What Unreleased Satellite Images Of The Balakot Strikes Show

Status
Not open for further replies.
Exclusive: What Unreleased Satellite Images Of The Balakot Strikes Show

Balakot air strike: The image accessed by NDTV is of the Markaz, the hostel for terrorists. The image is far clearer than any others published since the Balakot attack took place on February 26.


All India | Written by Vishnu Som | Updated: March 13, 2019 16:50 IST

NEW DELHI:

One of the images of the Indian Air Force (IAF)'s strike on the Jaish-e-Mohammed terror training camp in Pakistan's Balakot, seen by NDTV, is a monochrome high resolution photo.

This is an image of a hostel for Jaish terrorists that the IAF was tasked to attack.

The image is far clearer than any others published since the Balakot attack took place on February 26.

The image shows a house with sloping roofs -- nothing out of the ordinary in hilly areas.

There are, however, three clear marks on one of the sloping roofs. These can be described as "holes". Each hole has a diameter of 1 metre, a detail clearly mentioned on the printout of the satellite image.

These details are now a part of a dossier with the government which, according to the Hindustan Times, spells out the impact of the Balakot attack.

''Among the targets destroyed were a guest house where Maulana Masood Azhar, his brothers Adul Rauf Azhar and senior functionaries of the banned terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) usually stayed while visiting the camp and a Markaz or hostel for JeM's trainee terrorists, according to the report,'' says the Hindustan Times.

The image accessed by NDTV is of the Markaz, the hostel for terrorists.

6djm990k_prestrikebalakot650_625x300_13_March_19.jpg

Balakot Jaish-e-Mohammed base, 2018 (pre-strike)

The hostel, located immediately to the north of a large field at the Jaish facility, had a breadth of approximately 40 feet, a detail which can be corroborated on images on Google Earth Pro (shown above). Along its sides, it appears to be approximately 35-feet long.

rajp0alo_poststrike650_625x300_13_March_19.jpg

Balakot Jaish-e-Mohammed base, March 4, 2019 (post-strike)

This hostel seems missing altogether in the post-strike satellite image of March 4 (six days the IAF attack) which has been released by Reuters and shown above. The structure which was targeted either collapsed entirely or was taken down in the days following the February 26 attack. In its place, a patch of dark soil can clearly be seen in the satellite image handed out by Reuters.


Sources say that in addition to the hostel, there were two other buildings which were hit. ''One [bomb] for the trainers and senior hostel, and one [bomb] for the guest house.''

Both these buildings lie to the south of the field mentioned above and are under the cover of trees and not clearly visible in either pre-strike or post-strike images released commercially. The Air Force, however, says they have satellite images that clearly indicate that these buildings have been struck as well.

Earlier reports by satellite imagery experts suggested that the bomb entry points were visible in the largest structure at the Balakot camp, a structure described as a "hall". It is now unclear if this hall was hit by other weaponry or the damage shown is the result of the explosion of 3 Spice 2000 bombs just metres away.

The weapon used in all cases was an Israeli-designed smart munition called the Spice 2000, a long-range glide bomb which uses satellite guidance to home in on its targets.

Designed to prevent collateral damage, the weapon strikes within 3 metres of its designated impact point.

The IAF used a penetrator variant of the Spice 2000 which pierces roofs and floors and explodes at a pre-designated depth.

According to a senior officer, three weapons were dropped on one target (the hostel) within 1.5 to 3 metres of the point they were supposed to hit. The other two weapons hit their targets precisely - with no error whatsoever. Six weapons in all were carried by the Indian Air Force Mirage 2000 fighters involved in the attack mission.

Five bombs were dropped and all five hit their designated targets.

Getting this satellite imagery has been problematic for the Indian Air Force. NDTV has learnt that the best images that have been acquired come from a friendly partner nation. A satellite pass of the Balakot target in the hours following the IAF attack on the morning of February 26 did not reveal the detail the government was looking for because of the presence of clouds.

It is unclear if the government will ever release images of the attack. International media and security experts have questioned the success of the IAF's attack on the Jaish training facility. They say commercially available footage does not appear to show significant damage and that none of the structures appear to have been brought down. Jeffrey Lewis, the Director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Project at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies says, "The high-resolution images don't show any evidence of bomb damage."

The Indian Air Force counters this vociferously. Senior officers NDTV has spoken to describe the manner in which the Spice 2000 works and say the weapon does not necessarily bring down all buildings that it strikes. ''It kills all soft skin targets by the blast over pressure wave within a confined room. An advanced fuse, available as an option, can also count floors.'' In the case of Balakot, at least one of the Spice 2000 smart bombs was set to pierce a two-storey building before exploding.

It is still not clear if the government will release satellite images of the Balakot attack or intends to provide further proof on the number of terrorists who have been eliminated. What seems to be clear, though, is that the images do not show a `big bang.' There is, however, clear evidence of precision strikes on selected targets within the terror base in Balakot.

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bal...ot-air-strikes-show-2006941?pfrom=home-livetv

Dude leave it. This is most clear image of the strike zone but still this people will be in denial. They don't even question their army as to why not even a single reporter has been allowed to go inside the madrassa yet.
The moot point is we took our revenge
 
.
.
1. If what you say is true, that firstly there is no JeM madrassa there and secondly it was not bombed then you should have no problem letting media there. Infact your DGISPR promised on the day of the strikes, that he would take members of international media, as well as India media to the bombing site.

It has been over two weeks, that trip has not materialized yet .. why ?

Well, then you should turn off your TV for once because Reuters and many other international, domestic media has already visited the site and reported on it; just that the Indian media is not interested in the truth, rather interested in blatant propaganda.

Secondly, the whole scenario being painted that the missile penetrates before explosion and so causes no external damage -- true but that only works on cases where the building is reinforced and fortified against explosions, much like how the IAF's excuse for not deploying enough Sukhoi 30MKI jets is that they don't have enough ''bunkers" for the jers, these are reinforced bunkers, im sure you have already seen a video claiming to demonstrate this although its not a Spice 2000 but concept is similar.
Now, in the case of that madrassa, even a Spice 2000 (guide) loaded with shrapnel will bring that structure down; an AK-47 doing rounds can pierce not only a hole for each bullet, but also form cracks, target it with a shrapnel on just one of its face, let alone its internal structure which holds it, and the thing will come down.

Thirdly, the witnesses: Reuters and other international, domestic media already reported that the nearest local hospital staff said there was no influx of bodies at all. Some of the local people of Balakot, clearly said that while there used to be a camp, it was converted into a madrassa many years ago, one clearly mentioning that there used to be a camp in the 80s and 90s but was removed even before 2000, and one person even said that there is a madrassa and that their children even study there.
Furthermore, Reuters went a step further than other media and even contacted ambassadors and diplomatic missions, they quoted one as saying something along the lines that it is common knowledge among our intelligence circles that the camp is no longer in Balakot, and was packed up and dispersed along time ago.

The only thing this shows us, along with the seriously low resolution potato images that ANI obtained from military sources, is that India has no ground intelligence and is relying on outdated, old information as an excuse to continue its rhetoric and hold false grudges.
 
.
why is that needed when media was given access to locations where bombs fell.
All of your bombs were found in jungle.

Just 3 questions.

1. What was the target which IAF has claimed to hit and Pakistan denies?
2. Has media been allowed to visit that target?
3. If not why?
 
.
India media really really does swim in the gutter .. just listen to this garbage. And the proof is ???

 
.
Stop posting indian garbage propaganda here.
Not indian propaganda post, but Reuters which Pak members were very happy to cite when it published an article citing words of 'independent analysts' claiming no damage took place. Now that they say Pak army isnt allowing media to approach the strike site but is limiting access to the foothill, u call it propaganda....
 
.
Just 3 questions.

1. What was the target which IAF has claimed to hit and Pakistan denies?
2. Has media been allowed to visit that target?
3. If not why?

Just ask 3 questions.

1. How is that the target IAF claimed to hit is standing perfectly unscratched.
2. How is it that the locals heard nothing, saw nothing like ambulances, mass movement into and out of the building, nothing of the sort.
3. All locals sanely heard where the bombs fell and reached immediately, they did not point to anymore explosions anywhere else.
4. Any locals interviewed denied there was a camp, they said there used to be a camp but was converted into a madrassa and even children from the village went to study there.
 
.
Not indian propaganda post, but Reuters which Pak members were very happy to cite when it published an article citing words of 'independent analysts' claiming no damage took place. Now that they say Pak army isnt allowing media to approach the strike site but is limiting access to the foothill, u call it propaganda....

Maybe thats where we train our fighters to slap india???

Pakistan is fine

World narrative supported us

We have all our plane's

Our pilots werent humiliated and a bloodied picture on every major headline across the world

We have all our strategic assets



This has been a really humiliating episode for india
 
.
.
Exclusive: What Unreleased Satellite Images Of The Balakot Strikes Show

Balakot air strike: The image accessed by NDTV is of the Markaz, the hostel for terrorists. The image is far clearer than any others published since the Balakot attack took place on February 26.


All India | Written by Vishnu Som | Updated: March 13, 2019 16:50 IST

NEW DELHI:

One of the images of the Indian Air Force (IAF)'s strike on the Jaish-e-Mohammed terror training camp in Pakistan's Balakot, seen by NDTV, is a monochrome high resolution photo.

This is an image of a hostel for Jaish terrorists that the IAF was tasked to attack.

The image is far clearer than any others published since the Balakot attack took place on February 26.

The image shows a house with sloping roofs -- nothing out of the ordinary in hilly areas.

There are, however, three clear marks on one of the sloping roofs. These can be described as "holes". Each hole has a diameter of 1 metre, a detail clearly mentioned on the printout of the satellite image.

These details are now a part of a dossier with the government which, according to the Hindustan Times, spells out the impact of the Balakot attack.

''Among the targets destroyed were a guest house where Maulana Masood Azhar, his brothers Adul Rauf Azhar and senior functionaries of the banned terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) usually stayed while visiting the camp and a Markaz or hostel for JeM's trainee terrorists, according to the report,'' says the Hindustan Times.

The image accessed by NDTV is of the Markaz, the hostel for terrorists.

6djm990k_prestrikebalakot650_625x300_13_March_19.jpg

Balakot Jaish-e-Mohammed base, 2018 (pre-strike)

The hostel, located immediately to the north of a large field at the Jaish facility, had a breadth of approximately 40 feet, a detail which can be corroborated on images on Google Earth Pro (shown above). Along its sides, it appears to be approximately 35-feet long.

rajp0alo_poststrike650_625x300_13_March_19.jpg

Balakot Jaish-e-Mohammed base, March 4, 2019 (post-strike)

This hostel seems missing altogether in the post-strike satellite image of March 4 (six days the IAF attack) which has been released by Reuters and shown above. The structure which was targeted either collapsed entirely or was taken down in the days following the February 26 attack. In its place, a patch of dark soil can clearly be seen in the satellite image handed out by Reuters.


Sources say that in addition to the hostel, there were two other buildings which were hit. ''One [bomb] for the trainers and senior hostel, and one [bomb] for the guest house.''

Both these buildings lie to the south of the field mentioned above and are under the cover of trees and not clearly visible in either pre-strike or post-strike images released commercially. The Air Force, however, says they have satellite images that clearly indicate that these buildings have been struck as well.

Earlier reports by satellite imagery experts suggested that the bomb entry points were visible in the largest structure at the Balakot camp, a structure described as a "hall". It is now unclear if this hall was hit by other weaponry or the damage shown is the result of the explosion of 3 Spice 2000 bombs just metres away.

The weapon used in all cases was an Israeli-designed smart munition called the Spice 2000, a long-range glide bomb which uses satellite guidance to home in on its targets.

Designed to prevent collateral damage, the weapon strikes within 3 metres of its designated impact point.

The IAF used a penetrator variant of the Spice 2000 which pierces roofs and floors and explodes at a pre-designated depth.

According to a senior officer, three weapons were dropped on one target (the hostel) within 1.5 to 3 metres of the point they were supposed to hit. The other two weapons hit their targets precisely - with no error whatsoever. Six weapons in all were carried by the Indian Air Force Mirage 2000 fighters involved in the attack mission.

Five bombs were dropped and all five hit their designated targets.

Getting this satellite imagery has been problematic for the Indian Air Force. NDTV has learnt that the best images that have been acquired come from a friendly partner nation. A satellite pass of the Balakot target in the hours following the IAF attack on the morning of February 26 did not reveal the detail the government was looking for because of the presence of clouds.

It is unclear if the government will ever release images of the attack. International media and security experts have questioned the success of the IAF's attack on the Jaish training facility. They say commercially available footage does not appear to show significant damage and that none of the structures appear to have been brought down. Jeffrey Lewis, the Director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Project at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies says, "The high-resolution images don't show any evidence of bomb damage."

The Indian Air Force counters this vociferously. Senior officers NDTV has spoken to describe the manner in which the Spice 2000 works and say the weapon does not necessarily bring down all buildings that it strikes. ''It kills all soft skin targets by the blast over pressure wave within a confined room. An advanced fuse, available as an option, can also count floors.'' In the case of Balakot, at least one of the Spice 2000 smart bombs was set to pierce a two-storey building before exploding.

It is still not clear if the government will release satellite images of the Balakot attack or intends to provide further proof on the number of terrorists who have been eliminated. What seems to be clear, though, is that the images do not show a `big bang.' There is, however, clear evidence of precision strikes on selected targets within the terror base in Balakot.

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bal...ot-air-strikes-show-2006941?pfrom=home-livetv
Senior officers NDTV has spoken to describe the manner in which the Spice 2000 works and say the weapon does not necessarily bring down all buildings that it strikes. ''It kills all soft skin targets by the blast over pressure wave within a confined room. An advanced fuse, available as an option, can also count floors.'' In the case of Balakot, at least one of the Spice 2000 smart bombs was set to pierce a two-storey building before exploding.

Spice 2000 is just a glide and guidance kit for 2000 pound bombs not bomb you dumb Indians

That's why India is most ignorant in world ;)
 
.
Not indian propaganda post, but Reuters which Pak members were very happy to cite when it published an article citing words of 'independent analysts' claiming no damage took place. Now that they say Pak army isnt allowing media to approach the strike site but is limiting access to the foothill, u call it propaganda....

The strike site was the foothill, not the building. The building as pictures by Reuters has shown along with think tanks' satellite imagery is that the building stands unscratched.

The building is private property, and land as well on which it is built, which is why they are not allowing.
If you want to say they are stopping them because it's a training camp, well to that person I ask what kind of a training camp has a sign board propped up on the main road, and as well as I encourage to listen to what the locals had to say.
 
.
Just 3 questions.

1. What was the target which IAF has claimed to hit and Pakistan denies?
2. Has media been allowed to visit that target?
3. If not why?
1. Children of local people getting religious education.
2. Yes media had seen it from 200 m distance. The madrassa is a private property and its owner don't want anyone there. satellite pictures as well as eye witnesses interviews are available.
3. There were 4 bombs dropped and all 4 had been found and shown to media. So no need to shaow something whih was not targetted.

but my question is:
1. Your government had accepted "not much significant damage" in PAF surgical strike. How many were killed in "not much significant damage"?
2. had u shown it to international media?
3. if no then why?
 
.
The strike site was the foothill, not the building. The building as pictures by Reuters has shown along with think tanks' satellite imagery is that the building stands unscratched.

Unscratched? Did u even bother to read the article? An entire structure has turned into rubbles. On thetbiggest structure has clear 1 m wide entry hole is visible.

The building is private property, and land as well on which it is built, which is why they are not allowing.

So the Pakistani Army is guarding a private property?

1. Children of local people getting religious education.
2. Yes media had seen it from 200 m distance. The madrassa is a private property and its owner don't want anyone there. satellite pictures as well as eye witnesses interviews are available.
3. There were 4 bombs dropped and all 4 had been found and shown to media. So no need to shaow something whih was not targetted.

but my question is:
1. Your government had accepted "not much significant damage" in PAF surgical strike. How many were killed in "not much significant damage"?
2. had u shown it to international media?
3. if no then why?

Those are military structures, media cannot be allowed inside. Is the madrassa too a secret military station? Don't tell me it's a private property and Pakistani Army is guarding it.
 
.
Not indian propaganda post, but Reuters which Pak members were very happy to cite when it published an article citing words of 'independent analysts' claiming no damage took place. Now that they say Pak army isnt allowing media to approach the strike site but is limiting access to the foothill, u call it propaganda....
just goolge and show me hafiz saeed jamia images ? did ever Pakistanis allowed media in any hafiz saeed's or massood madrasa ? they are doing it since ages .show me 3 pictures of inside masood madrasa from past i will admit it . you guys are totally lost paksitan will never allow it becasue they can be used against paksitan .

you guys even don't know name of that city where they have madrasas or major hub of them .
 
.
Senior officers NDTV has spoken to describe the manner in which the Spice 2000 works and say the weapon does not necessarily bring down all buildings that it strikes. ''It kills all soft skin targets by the blast over pressure wave within a confined room. An advanced fuse, available as an option, can also count floors.'' In the case of Balakot, at least one of the Spice 2000 smart bombs was set to pierce a two-storey building before exploding.

Spice 2000 is just a glide and guidance kit for 2000 pound bombs not bomb you dumb Indians

That's why India is most ignorant in world ;)

See the below image. Notice something similar in the sattelite images provided by India?

Screenshot_2019-03-13-21-53-32-305_com.android.chrome.png
Screenshot_2019-03-13-21-53-28-299_com.android.chrome.png
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom