Exclusive: What Unreleased Satellite Images Of The Balakot Strikes Show

[Mrc]

Nope, they were not allowed to climb the hill and see inside the madressa. Wonder what's they hiding.

May b they just dont want brown haired reporters to mix with religious school students for a variety of reasons.....
Dont mix together very well.... Did that thought cross your primitive mind at all??????

 

[darksider]

I dont understand how could you hide deaths of large number of people in this era of information technology when every mobile holder is camera man.
Can op explain it?

 

[Thorough Pro]

Photoshopped

What Unreleased Satellite Images Of The Balakot Strikes Show

 

[Mrc]

I dont understand how could you hide deaths of large number of people in this era of information technology when every mobile holder is camera man.
Can op shower some light on it?

Villagers clearly say one baba gee received cut on his eye brow from broken glass... Which he dressed him self and one crow plus 16 trees died...

U cannot hide 1 death let alone 300 from these villagers... Usually there is only or two routes up the mountain and even a single car would have been noted by villagers ..

I dont believe that a world still exists where people believe in such blatant lies...

But apparently it does

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

I dont believe that a world still exists where people believe in such blatant lies...

But apparently it does

Indians for years have been fed propaganda that they are the next superpower, that they can crush Pakistan like and ant when they feel like it, that their SU-30’s were unmatched compared to anything the PAF had, so there’s a lot of denial currently about their failures.

 

[The SC]

Photoshopped

Definitely

 

[Chhatrapati]

this one is concrete bunker not a rag tag madrassa man use some sense please . you hit a crow and we admit it our loss of trees and crow

You haven't seen how it is, neither have anyone for that matter. That's a bummer.

Yes it does. You can’t just change the laws of physics. The bomb has a penetrator ‘head’ that allows it to go through reinforced structures prior to detonation. So, as shown in that video, the bomb penetrates through the concrete structure before detonating its explosives. However, the explosive blast and the resulting shockwave would demolish any ordinary structure. You can see how large the blast radius is in comparison to the Airplane.

That depends the type of warhead used on Spice 2000. You can use it to destroy an entire structure, or a low yield one.
And you can't analyse something you can't see. Which is my point that nobody has seen the structure of Madressa, it's just an elevation all of us can see. Was there any other structure? Nobody knows. Nobody is allowed too.

 

[I.R.A]

Dude leave it. This is most clear image of the strike zone but still this people will be in denial. They don't even question their army as to why not even a single reporter has been allowed to go inside the madrassa yet.
The moot point is we took our revenge

Do you know how much time it takes for a pine tree to grow?

Look at both the images ...... one is from 2018 and one from 2019. I can tell you with authority that it doesn't take a year for a pine tree to grow this much.

"About five years after planting, the best trees are usually pruned up to a height of 4 metres. At around seven years, the trees may be pruned up to 6.5 metres. At around nine years, when the trees are 16 metres high, all the unpruned trees are felled to allow the remainder room to grow."

Balakot forest is full of pine trees mostly.

Hum kitnay jhoot mary gay ....... tumharay her ghar say jhoot nikaly ga.

 

[Orca]

So 6 2,000 lbs bombs did nothing but make 1 metre holes on the roof

This is what 2,000 lbs bombs do when they hit a target:

This is what 500 lbs bombs do:

So what kind of ordinance did India use to cause no damage but small holes in the roof? What was even the point of a SirJiKal strike if the buildings were left standing?

now they are saying the mighty indian air force used the 70kg of sophisticated weapon (missile) which penetrated in the compound just like pinhole camera and exploded inside the room so the building structure is intact.

 

[newb3e]

now they are saying the mighty indian air force used the 70kg of sophisticated weapon (missile) which penetrated in the compound just like pinhole camera and exploded inside the room so the building structure is intact.

indians are nice and pissfull people they only wanted to kill terrorists and not do damage to property! how blessed are we to have such a caring enemy!

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

That depends the type of warhead used on Spice 2000. You can use it to destroy an entire structure, or a low yield one.

The madrassa is isolated on a hill top, and the bombs used by the IAF were strong enough to shatter window panes of houses in the village and cause structural cracks. 2 points arise from that:

1. Given the relatively isolated location of the madrassa complex, the IAF could have bombed the complex without concern over any collateral damage, so the argument that they used 'tiny explosives' just does not pass muster.

2. The IAF could not have known exactly which part of the building the Madrassa residents were in. So the most logical course of action would have been to target with an explosive that would ensure that the entire building was impacted. Any explosive of that size would cause significant structural damage and fires. Yet none of the satellite images or on the scene reporters saw any such signs or smoke from the resultant fires.
[quote
And you can't analyse something you can't see. Which is my point that nobody has seen the structure of Madressa, it's just an elevation all of us can see. Was there any other structure? Nobody knows. Nobody is allowed too.[/QUOTE]

Satellite imagery before and after confirms the Pakistani version. Like the Pakistanis claiming 'Israeli pilots were captured' and/or 'Israel was actively supporting India militarily', the Indian claims remain conspiracy theories without any evidence, and plenty of evidence supporting the Pakistani claims.

 

[Chhatrapati]

1. Given the relatively isolated location of the madrassa complex, the IAF could have bombed the complex without concern over any collateral damage, so the argument that they used 'tiny explosives' just does not pass muster.

There were houses below the structure. What if there were kids in there. That will not look good on us. If we had used heavy Mark 84 warheads, the blast radius could've been more wide spread.

2. The IAF could not have known exactly which part of the building the Madrassa residents were in. So the most logical course of action would have been to target with an explosive that would ensure that the entire building was impacted. Any explosive of that size would cause significant structural damage and fires. Yet none of the satellite images or on the scene reporters saw any such signs or smoke from the resultant fires.

I can't speculate on why IAF used a low yield one's why not destroy the entire structure etc... Also, you didn't allow any reporters for the next 3 days since the strike. The only images released was of tree falling. Army had cordoned off the region. And still refuse to let them into the madressa. If there is no problem in allowing them out there, you got nothing to hide and there is no damage, why not show them the rooms. 'Our hands are clean, we don't operate terror camps, these were abandoned buildings'.

the Indian claims remain conspiracy theories without any evidence, and plenty of evidence supporting the Pakistani claims.

Your theory has holes in it. You keep hiding things which makes it suspicious.

May b they just dont want brown haired reporters to mix with religious school students for a variety of reasons.....
Dont mix together very well.... Did that thought cross your primitive mind at all??????

But you claimed these are abandoned buildings and no madrassas operate there.

What so troublesome about a simple madressa? You yourselves are making your madressas look suspicious by comments like "Dont mix together very well with western media reporters"

 

[Mrc]

What so troublesome about a simple madressa? You yourselves are making your madressas look suspicious by comments like "Dont mix together very well with western media reporters"

Thats not the point.... Point is
Madrassa suspicious or not is still intact and holding classes... With 0 impact and 0 bomb damage

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

There were houses below the structure. What if there were kids in there. That will not look good on us. If we had used heavy Mark 84 warheads, the blast radius could've been more wide spread.

Even with relatively smaller explosives there would have been significant damage to the structures, which is not visible externally or from satellite images.

I can't speculate on why IAF used a low yield one's why not destroy the entire structure etc... Also, you didn't allow any reporters for the next 3 days since the strike. The only images released was of tree falling. Army had cordoned off the region. And still refuse to let them into the madressa. If there is no problem in allowing them out there, you got nothing to hide and there is no damage, why not show them the rooms. 'Our hands are clean, we don't operate terror camps, these were abandoned buildings'.

It doesn't matter what yield the IAF used as long as they didn't lob something as small as a grenade, and even then the resulting fires etc would leave visible smoke and fire damage. The reason journalists were not allowed in is because it is a JeM madrassa and Pakistan didn't want that being used as propaganda. The satellite imagery analysis and local reporting is more than enough to confirm the Pakistani version.

Your theory has holes in it. You keep hiding things which makes it suspicious.

Not really, since almost the entire world (including reputable media organizations such as Reuters, Al Jazeera, BBC etc) have all confirmed the Pakistani account.

The only people who believe there are 'holes in the Pakistani account' are deluded Indians still grasping at straws to hide the failures of Modi and the IAF.

 

[The Eagle]

Exclusive is must to attract Indians in front of TV. Unreleased images but shows Balakot Strike, is specialty that only Indian Media possess in the universe ... Only Indians can do that...

Doesn't need further clarification or explanation.



The British news agency Reuters says high-resolution satellite images show buildings which India claimed its warplanes had hit in Balakot killing a large number of militants still standing at the site.

The images produced by Planet Labs, a San Francisco-based private satellite operator has shown at least six buildings on the site six days after the airstrike.

The image is virtually unchanged from an April 2018 satellite photo of the facility.

There are no discernible holes in the roofs of buildings, no signs of blown-out walls, displaced trees around the site or other signs of an aerial attack.




However, I can feel that such mental torture will continue unless Modi wins next election but a lot of victims can be saved for not providing space to repeated propaganda.

Thread closed with regards,