Damir877
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2018
- Messages
- 323
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Same goes for the rest of the French armed forces.
The President,as the chief of the armed forces,doesn't need the parliament's approval to start a war or an operation.
The government has however to inform the parliament no later than three days after the intervention started and specify its objectives. There might be a debate following but without a vote.
However after 4 months,the president needs the parliament's approval to continue it.
Well then i stand corrected.Was it like that in the past(last few decades) as well or was that introduced recently?
The remark that simply explains what you just wrote.
So at the end, you are just here trying to gain some sort of "high ground" in this conversation, despite there being none.
Thanks for explaining me what i wanted to say.I didn't know it until your answer opened my eyes.
Unlike you, I am not assuming things about the other persons background.
See what you just did there is called projection(google it)i never assumed anything about your background in fact if you go up in the comment you will see it was the other way around.
Yes I did, because that is exactly what the individuals who served, or are serving in the Legion have said.
It is nothing but relays.
Chances are still very slim of seeing combat.
Now, again I will say the same thing.
It is nobody's fault that you believe that France is always fighting somewhere.
It maybe out of the public eye, but that is what it is.
You are contradicting yourself.In first sentence you say they don't see combat in the last one that "maybe,out of the public eye" they are fighting somewhere.Which one it is,make up your mind?
Of course i don't think France always uses them to fight.They just give them salaries,food,beds and citizenship because... "political reasons".