What's new

Europe, China at Impasse on Satellite Navigation

Status
Not open for further replies.

houshanghai

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 19, 2009
Messages
1,732
Reaction score
0
Thu, 20 January, 2011
Europe, China at Impasse on Satellite Navigation
By Peter B. de Selding

ShareThis

Beidou_Xinhua02.jpg



China's Long March 3C rocket launched the third Bediou-Compass navigation satellite from Xichang Satellite Launch Center. Credit: Xinhua photo
Enlarge Image
PARIS — Negotiations to resolve signal overlaps between European and Chinese satellite navigation systems have made no progress despite more than two years of effort and the issue now poses “a major problem for the security of the EU,” the European Commission says.

“[A] solution will not be found without political support” from top European authorities and from the European Parliament, according to the commission, which is the executive arm of the 27-nation European Union (EU).

In a Jan. 18 update on Europe’s Galileo satellite navigation system, the commission suggests that efforts to persuade China to move away from frequencies planned for Galileo’s Public Regulated Service (PRS) have gone nowhere. PRS is Galileo’s equivalent to the U.S. GPS military code, which is encrypted and reserved for defense and security customers.

China is under no legal or regulatory obligation to steer clear of PRS for its Compass/Beidou navigation system, now being deployed, because a signal overlap will not prevent users of either system from accessing their services.

But the overlap will make it impossible for China or Europe to jam one another’s signals without disabling their own service. This is an issue the United States and Europe spent several years negotiating before European authorities agreed to place PRS on a radio frequency some distance from the GPS military code.

The commission’s report says Galileo is in a competitive race with Russian and Chinese navigation constellations to be the global complement to GPS and is at risk of losing the race because of Galileo delays that likely will mean full service is not available before 2020.

The Russian Glonass and Chinese Compass/Beidou efforts have been given priority by their government sponsors. Glonass is now expected to return to full global service by 2012, with Compass/Beidou following perhaps two or three years later.

These services, plus regional systems being built by Japan and India, and the established GPS system, “provide a challenge … in competitive terms,” the commission says.

Already the presence of GPS as a global utility free of user fees has forced Galileo managers to scrap former ideas of generating lots of revenue from Galileo’s commercial service.

In the report, the commission says it has abandoned ideas of imposing a royalty fee on navigation chipsets, and of charging commercial airlines for use of the safety-of-life feature on a Galileo overlay feature called Egnos. No fees will be imposed for use of the safety-of-life service on Galileo either, the commission says, noting that GPS users get it free of charge.

In addition to causing Europe to fall into third- or fourth-place position among navigation terminal builders worldwide, service delays will reduce the economic benefits expected of Galileo, the commission says.

Each year’s delay of full service availability “will decrease the value of the benefits by 10-15 percent owing to both the loss of revenue generated and the development of alternative solutions and competing systems,” the commission says.


link:http://www.spacenews.com/civil/110120-europe-china-impasse.html
6th Beidou-2 satellite

7th Beidou-2 satellite

 
Last edited by a moderator:
other news


Europe defends 'stupid' Galileo satellite

Europe defends 'stupid' Galileo satellite
January 18, 2011 by Yann Ollivier
Enlarge
A computer-generated image shows three satellites, part of the European Galileo navigation system network, in 2002. Europe stood by its much-delayed and over-budget Galileo satellite navigation system on Tuesday despite a rising price tag and a contractor's description of the project as "stupid."

acomputergen.jpg

Europe stood by its much-delayed and over-budget Galileo satellite navigation system on Tuesday despite a rising price tag and a contractor's description of the project as "stupid."
Ads by Google
Top GPS - The Best GPS Models Expert Ratings by Consumer Reports® - ConsumerReports.org


Europe defends 'stupid' Galileo satellite


Previously estimated to cost 3.4 billion euros, the European Commission said an extra 1.9 billion euros was needed to complete the constellation of satellites, raising its price tag to 5.4 billion euros ($7.2 billion).
Aimed at rivaling the US-built Global Positioning System (GPS) and Chinese and Russian projects, the system needs more cash due to the higher costs of the development phase and satellite launchers, the commission said.
"We need to bear in mind that Russia is engaged in deploying its global system and China is continuing to increase its own systems too. Japan and India are also entering the scene," Tajani said.
"That means Europeans cannot lag behind," he told a news conference at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France.
Galileo is scheduled to go online in 2014 -- six years later than originally planned -- with an initial constellation of 18 satellites. The first two satellites will be launched in the third quarter of this year.
But the commission said in a policy paper that 3.4 billion euros was "not enough to complete the infrastructure."
An extra 1.9 billion euros is needed to launch the remaining 12 satellites by 2020 and offer the full services promised by the project.
In addition, the commission said the operating costs for Galileo and a sister system called EGNOS will amount to 800 million euros a year.
Europe wants to end its dependence on the US GPS system in a market the commission said would grow from 130 billion euros in 2010 to 240 billion euros in 2020.
"The Galileo project is going ahead, the commission has decided on this," Tajani said.
"It will improve the lives of citizens in sectors such as transport, agriculture, energy and combatting illegal immigration," he added.
A row erupted over the system after the whistleblower website WikiLeaks published a US diplomatic cable quoting scathing criticism from the head of German firm OHB Technology, which was awarded a 566-million-euro to develop 14 Galileo satellites.
According to an October 2009 cable from the US embassy in Berlin, OHB Technology chief Berry Smutny said: "I think Galileo is a stupid idea that primarily serves French interests."
He went on to say that Galileo was "a waste of EU taxpayers' money championed by French interests," according to the cable.
The company announced Tuesday that it had suspended Smutny, who has denied making the comments.
Tajani dismissed the WikiLeaks report, saying he had met Smutny before the leak and that he had stated that he believed in Galileo. The company has since committed "wholeheartdly to delivering the Galileo system," Tajani said.
"WikiLeaks isn't the gospel," Tajani said.
(c) 2011 AFP
Ads by Google

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-europe-defends-stupid-galileo-satellite.html
 
“[A] solution will not be found without political support” from top European authorities and from the European Parliament, according to the commission, which is the executive arm of the 27-nation European Union (EU).

Basically polite speak for saying they are gonna politically gang up and try to strong-arm china
 
The Europe Galieo is behind the Chinese COMPASS because Europe system is another Joint project. Whenever you have JOINT project it always get over budget, delay and screw up.

China did a very wise move develop its own global satalite system. Now it is bearing fruit by 2016 it will become full operational.:china:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom