What's new

Erbil, Iraq: Ballistic Missiles used to strike a house near US Consulate

.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 The Iranian are so freaking out that they keep the bullshing going. Israel never hide causalities , in every war Israel published the names of the fallen soldiers.

The zionist regime published the names of its fallen soldiers, not intelligence operatives. It was never claimed that those killed in the strike on Erbil were "I"DF soldiers but that they were in fact Mossad agents, and the targeted mansion was said to have been used as a base by the zionist intelligence agency. Tel Aviv doesn't publish the names of its spies and intelligence assets.

Israel sand to hell 2 Iranian generals and in response they attack empty house in arab county 😂. Just today the Israei news published that Israel destroy dron base with more than 100 uavs inside iran

The two IRGC members martyred in that criminal act are not generals, the rank of both is Sarhang in other terms field officers.
 
Last edited:
.
Watch & Subscribe
Iran fires 12 Ballistic Missiles on Erbil (Iraq) on Spy consulate
 
.
What's with Iran firing ballistic missiles on fellow Muslim nations while chanting death to America like some crazy, deranged, loony nation?

List of Iranian Ballistic Missile attacks on Muslim nations.

Day
Date
Target
No. of missiles​
Sunday​
18 June 2017​
Syria​
6​
Saturday​
8 September 2018​
Iraq​
7​
Monday​
01 October 2018​
Syria​
6​
Wednesday​
08 January 2020​
Iraq​
22​
Monday​
13 March 2022​
Iraq​
12​
Yes, Isis and mossad are your fellow Muslim brothers

Hopefully the deal doesn't get signed so that an exercise can occur on them which could provide a green light for the arabs to be unleashed on them..
The deadly Arabs of Dubai and Kuwait.

The prophet said we will conquer fars twice.. 1st golden age and 3rd golden...

The pen is dry.. Destiny will always take hold.. Nothing on god's earth will be able to alter destiny.. The paper tiger sassinds can try to outrun that..
The conquest of fars happened with the fall of the shah and the establishment of the Islamic establishment you Muppet. Iran now represent God's forces. We fight for god and his people... You fight for Daddy Yankee. Big difference
 
Last edited:
. .
Watch & Subscribe
Iran fires 12 Ballistic Missiles on Erbil (Iraq) on Spy consulate
when are they gonna fire them on israel or try and defend syria

The conquest of fars happened with the fall of the shah and the establishment of the Islamic establishment you Muppet. Iran now represent God's forces. We fight for god and his people... You fight for Daddy Yankee. Big difference
Apparently God is some corrupt Morshed sitting on his throne lol
 
.
when are they gonna fire them on israel or try and defend syria

When is Egypt going to rescind the 1978 peace treaty it concluded with the zionist entity at Camp David? When is Egypt going to stop recognizing the apartheid regime in Palestine? When is Egypt going to arm, fund and train an Arab guerilla movement capable of liberating its lands from zionist occupation like Iran did with Lebanon's Hezbollah? When is Egypt going to extend military aid to the Palestinian Resistance in Gaza, earning praise from Hamas and PIJ leaders? When is Egypt going to send advisers, fighters and weapons to Damascus to defend from zionist-backed terrorists let alone Isra"el"i air strikes?

When Egypt actually dares to proceed with the above, an Egyptian who supports the regime in Cairo shall be entitled to take issue with Iran's engagement in favor of her allies. Else rhetoric questions like the above tend to come across as preposterous.
 
Last edited:
.
When is Egypt going to rescind the 1978 peace treaty it concluded with the zionist entity at Camp David? When is Egypt going to stop recognizing the apartheid regime in Palestine? When is Egypt going to arm, fund and train an Arab guerilla movement capable of liberating its lands from zionist occupation like Iran did with Lebanon's Hezbollah? When is Egypt going to extend military aid to the Palestinian Resistance in Gaza, earning praise from Hamas and PIJ leaders? When is Egypt going to send advisers and arms to Damascus to defend from zionist-backed terrorists let alone Isra"el"i air strikes?

When Egypt actually dares to proceed with the above, an Egyptian supportive of the regime in Cairo shall be entitled to take issue with Iran's engagement in favor of her allies. Else rhetoric questions like the above tend to come across as preposterous.
where are our occupied lands? Who said we arent sending aid to gaza? Do you think we are looking for pride? Do you think we are looking for praise? WE never looked for praise otherwise most of our movments that are not announced will be announced including fake probganda like yours.Your whole country is built upon an ideology that will never be acheived by you and is used as a tool to jail iranians labblled with treason and Zionist alligned. You know destruction of israel is never and will never be one of the advantges to a country that uses the palestnian cause as an excuse to fight in yemen and stay in lebanon prevent an actual goverment control lebanon get it out of its chaos it lived due iranian israeli ambitions. Again let me repeat my question. When will iran fullfill its only purpose or was it just probganda and iranian colonization as usual? Lets not forget the iran iraq war where you depended on israeli american weapons and intelligence As israel knew iraq is a bigger threat to it than iran and you didnt refuse the help as you were desperate. Your and our weapons are going through sinai to gaza we couldve prevented it if we were an israeli puppet like most iranians say and yet Iran does not do anything but destroy everything in the middle east and prevent development as they know when development and justice comes their use will be useless. UNtil you fullfill your only purpose and stop using it as probganda to calm your people from riotting on you then you can talk. While you were sucking them off we were fighting them. Building our economy is a must 7 decades of war was never good. And oh boy we are good at building our economy ground up we are already being pressured by the same apparthied state from recent military development in sinai new HQs airports tunnels and new cities. HEzbollah did nothing but control the country fully prevent development. Their use was at 1982 but now their loyalness is to iran then Lebanon then God
 
.
Who said we arent sending aid to gaza?

Military-level assistance. Humanitarian aid is provided even by the EU and doesn't really contribute to empowering Resistance against occupation.

Do you think we are looking for pride? Do you think we are looking for praise? WE never looked for praise otherwise most of our movments that are not announced will be announced including fake probganda like yours.

Who said their praise is what Iran is after? I mentioned this to clarify that Iran's support means something to the Palestinian Resistance. It is not negligible, contrary to what some propaganda sources have been trying to suggest. If what I explained is "fake" then Gaza leaders are hypocrites and liars. Pick one.

Your whole country is built upon an ideology that will never be acheived by you and is used as a tool to jail iranians labblled with treason and Zionist alligned.

The Islamic revolutionary ideology is being concretely implemented in practice, and has been so for 43 years.

You know destruction of israel is never and will never be one of the advantges to a country that uses the palestnian cause as an excuse to fight in yemen and stay in lebanon prevent an actual goverment control lebanon get it out of its chaos it lived due iranian israeli ambitions.

Iran is the only state actor on earth brave ebough to supply weapons to the Palestinian Resistance. It is the only country on earth which dared to arm Lebanese people so they could kick out zionist occupiers from their land. That doesn't sound like an excuse by any measure, but like an end onto itself.

As for preventing the Lebanese central state from asserting control, why the selective bias? Last time I checked, every communal movement in Lebanon has its own armed militia and is thereby challenging state monopoly on violence; every communal party in Lebanon is benefiting from the privileges that the communalist system inherited from the French mandate grants its leaders. So pointing fingers at Hezbollah would be quite out of place. Especially when out of all paramilitary organizations, Hezbollah is the only one which never fired a single shot at the Lebanese national army.

Concerning Yemen, the current conflict there started several decades after Iran began supporting anti-zionist Resistance groups in the Levant. And even in Yemen, Iran is siding with the most staunchly anti-zionist faction one could find, versus regimes like the UAE which have actually recognized and established diplomatic ties with Isra"el".

And while we're at it, why not mention Egypt's intervention in northern Yemen during the 1962-1970 civil war? Does it invalidate Naser's confrontation with Tel Aviv? No it doesn't, and the same is true of Iran.

Again let me repeat my question. When will iran fullfill its only purpose or was it just probganda and iranian colonization as usual?

Where does this apparent eagerness to sideline over four decades of recent history stem from? During this period and with the exception of Saddam's Iraq, Iran along with its Syrian ally has been the only state actor in the region to actively oppose the regime in Tel Aviv and to back local guerillas fighting zionist occupation. This is Iran's purpose, no more and no less.

"Colonization"? The term doesn't apply to Iranian policy in any shape or form.

I shall repeat as well, then: when will Egypt finally join Iran and stop recognizing the zionist entity, and when will Cairo start assisting those who are resisting the apartheid state? I would welcome such a development. But as long as it doesn't happen, those supportive of the Egyptian government aren't exactly in a position to deride Iranian efforts against Isra"el".

Lets not forget the iran iraq war where you depended on israeli american weapons and intelligence

This is an incorrect statement. Iran did not depend on US arms supplies. To give an idea, Iran received 2500 TOW missiles in the framework of the Iran-Contra affair, just two years before the conclusion of the eight-year war; by contrast, Washington supplied Saudi Arabia with no less than 13000 of those same ATGM's with the express purpose of having them transferred to anti-government insurgents in Syria.

Also, the USA never intended to sell any weapons to revolutionary Iran - Iran coerced them into it by escalating in Lebanon, where pro-Iranian fighters struck the Marines barracks, instantly killing no less than 307 US and French troops, eliminated the CIA station chief for the Middle East, in addition to capturing dozens of westerners. Tehran offered to mediate the liberation of these captives in exchange for a token, overpriced quantity of weapons.


Compare this with several hundreds of fighter jets, many hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles, and much more sold to Iraq by both western and eastern blocs. Not to mention precursors to chemical weapons, French pilots flying Iraqi jets, as well as a US veto at the UN Security Council blocking a resolution meant to condemn Baghdad's use of WMD.

What Iran received was a drop in the bucket in comparison to the massive amounts of weaponry Iraq was literally being flooded with, including from western sources. And in Iraq's case, none of these were black market deals, it was all official.

Oh, and did I mention how the US directly entered the war on Iraq's side?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Praying_Mantis

Or how the US Navy downed an Iranian civilian airliner?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

As for intelligence, there seems to be a confusion here, because Iran did not receive any intel from the US (let alone from Isra"el"). It was Iraq which was fed a steady stream of live satellite images from America, including in support of operations where Baghdad was resorting to chemical weapons, with the full knowledge and tacit approval of Washington.

1652386589988.png


And Iran had no dealings with Isra"el". It was the US which partly fell back on Isra"el"i stockpiles in order to cover up its tracks, given how Reagan tried to keep the whole undertaking hidden from Congress. When Iran realized some weapons were transiting from Isra"el", she refused further deliveries from that channel.

As israel knew iraq is a bigger threat to it than iran and you didnt refuse the help as you were desperate.

Isra"el" played no proactive role. As for the US, the actual actor behind the rather insignificant weapons supplies, it had been pushed by Iran to acquiesce to these deliveries. Washington did not decide so on its own initiative nor by its own volition.

Your and our weapons are going through sinai to gaza we couldve prevented it if we were an israeli puppet like most iranians say and yet Iran does not do anything but destroy everything in the middle east and prevent development as they know when development and justice comes their use will be useless.

Well, ask the Palestinians. They tend to know a thing or two about the zionist regime's unwillingness to reach a just settlement, as demonstrated time and again. The Palestinians wouldn't forego their Resistance if Iran withdrew support. They'd be considerably less effective at it, but would still fight on for their rights.

Moreover, Iran did not start any of the wars she was involved in since 1979. I'd suggest to direct any complaints to the actual initiators of full scale military conflicts. It's not as if they get to start and end these wars as they please. Indeed, aggressors must accept that the aggressed may well turn out to be the ones who decide when and how the fighting should end.

No justice, no peace, the saying goes. Justice is the prime factor here.

UNtil you fullfill your only purpose and stop using it as probganda to calm your people from riotting on you then you can talk.

It's been a constant, uninterrupted Iranian policy for 43 years. Since when is it forbidden to defend a policy under the pretext that the ultimate goal it is pursuing hasn't been achieved yet? It's like saying the USA and the USSR had no right to promote their respective geopolitical orientations during 46 years of bipolar antagonism because none of the parties had collapsed as of yet.

Iran's anti-zionist stance is not a pretense aimed at satisfying domestic opinion. Those familiar with Iranian politics will confirm that non-stop bombardment of the Iranian public with psy-ops and propaganda beamed into the country by western-, zionist- and Saudi-funded outlets, has taken aim precisely at Iran's support for the Palestinian cause. In all these protests we hear about, the slogan has been "no to Gaza, no to Lebanon, I will sacrifice myself for Iran" ("نه غزه نه لبنان جانم فدای ایران"). So if Iranian authorities wished to placate this lot, they'd cease any and all manifestation of solidarity with the Palestinians, not the other way around.

iran-fake-news3-e1553598777171-640x400-1.jpg
84526-252732-1406095847.jpg


While you were sucking them off we were fighting them.

We're talking different states here. The Iranian monarchy which was collaborating with the zionists, happened to be toppled in a popular revolution in 1979 and replaced by an Islamic Republic, which completely turned around Iran's worldview and foreign policy outlook. What the shah regime did has no bearing on the Islamic Republic, and the latter cannot be held accountable for what the former did.

If the shah of Iran's policy vis à vis Isra"el" qualifies as "sucking them off", then the same terms would have to apply to Egyptian policy post-Camp David, since both have been very much similar in this regard.

Building our economy is a must 7 decades of war was never good. And oh boy we are good at building our economy ground up we are already being pressured by the same apparthied state from recent military development in sinai new HQs airports tunnels and new cities.

I'm not arguing against building Egypt's economy. However I'm not sure that recognizing the zionist entity represents an obligatory precondition to economic development.

Also conventional war against Isra"el" frankly wasn't the way to go. Tel Aviv needs to be confronted asymmetrically.

HEzbollah did nothing but control the country fully prevent development. Their use was at 1982 but now their loyalness is to iran then Lebanon then God

Hezbollah's loyalties are unchanged. If someone believes that Lebanon must conclude a peace deal with Isra"el" in order to be able to develop, I would submit that they don't understand the motivations and goals of the zionist entity, nor the path to autonomous, sustainable development.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom