AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
One last chance to Demorcrazy , with imran bhai after that ...
We go with PUTIN style
We go with PUTIN style
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks friend!Hate to say it, but a military strong-man may be what Pakistan needs now. When education improves (let's say, 75% literacy), then go back to civilian democracy.
What you are describing is close to a "republic," it is the system we use in the US (not a "true" democracy, as in every citizen doesn't vote on every law), we have representatives do it for us.Yes I think each village will implement it and have thier own head. And then each head will represent thier village. And the village heads will council on the matters of the town, likewise the town elders on the city and the city. Something like that.
I just noticed they're will be no head of goverment in this type of system since it's all about councils and then you have one judge.
It will need much thinking to how it will be implemented on a national scale. Or maybe we can semi use it with other forms of goverment for national matters.
Sory PUTIN is ex-militry & ex-KGB.One last chance to Demorcrazy , with imran bhai after that ...
We go with PUTIN style
What you are describing is close to a "republic," it is the system we use in the US (not a "true" democracy, as in every citizen doesn't vote on every law), we have representatives do it for us.
I see. But I think the problem in Pakistan was that because justice is not given to the common villager for land disputes and small crimes etc. Like someone puts a claim to another persons land, in the current system you will need proof so it's your word against theres. However, in a village everyone knows each other you see, so proof is not required because people themselves know the reality of who the land belongs to.
It is also better for verifying the credibility of a witness since you lived alongside them.
Forgive me if I'm not making sense now, I never personally research it myself and I'm just rehashing what I've heard.
It makes great sense, and local problems do need to be handled locally. Government is best bottom up rather than top down.
Its not pakarmy capturing the power , its them stupid politicians kicking each other, & making problems for the country eventually dividing our country, calling army to help?
It was one. Of our great genrls making posible spy planes flight over russia for watching russian strategic positions & much more!
It was another great genrl pining down soviet invasion in afghanistan, then it was last of the our 3rd great genrls giving & support & fight against AL-qaeeda+ talibans in afghanistan,
Just like when musharaff came into power?
And after all that these great generals did for the west they still hate us.......your right,the americans are excellent friends and the pakistan generals where genesis in gettin the "west to lick there boots".
Liaquat Ali Khan the supporter of the crazy idea of democracy made friends with the chinese and look where that got us.
Bhutto another supporter of the crazy idea took on the path of nuclear power and closer links in the islamic world was killed by the great zia who in a decade made sure we had 3-5 million extra refugees and a everyhouse hold had gun and drug addicted child.....he made pakistan strong.
The issue with Martial Law is the option of Having Democracy under. If it is removed from the scratch then I think Martial law authorities can be more powerful, can concentrate more on development rather then political. And this was the one reason for drop down of General Ayub, Zia and even Musharaf.
sory to differ with you dear,
its the continuation of the personalities, personal command on things, which is a sickness, it happenend to all the 3 great genrls, we were disscusing about!
rotation of command, with bond to continue the basic, is the key here!
chinse peoples, sosialist rebublic, & iranian revolution were doing fine, just because they have kept the rotation , on the top?
never mind, lolzIt's merely be called differing, since my pov was from Democracy vs Martial Law. While your pov is from dictatorial element of Martial Law
who invited , gen,zia? PNA?
The Pakistani history recorded two big movements after 1947. The first one was of 1977 PNA movement for the implementation of the Islamic system. Nine political parties formed an alliance against Bhutto's PPP in the elections of 1977. They launched a movement with the manifesto of implementing an Islamic system. The foremost dominant parties of nine parties alliance were the religious political parties. The election results showed their defeat. They accused Bhutto's govt. of rigging and launched a protest movement against the government.
read it carefully!
its not pakarmy , its the dam politicians of the 9 different political parties?
stop blaming PAKARMY, instead try to find , a single dam good , fare, uncroupt pakistani politician now? will you?