Endless UP riots, yet India doesn’t see beyond Gujarat 2002, strange!

[IndoCarib]

The death toll in the Muzaffarnagar communal riots in Uttar Pradesh is rising and it looks the state is being successfully led back to the stone age by the Samajwadi Party (SP) regime. The politically crucial state has reportedly witnessed nearly 3,000 riots so far this year! Add with these, alleged killing of a top police officer by a ruling party member, victimization of an IAS officer by the politician-mafia nexus, religious mobilisation over the old issue of Ram Temple for political gains and several other incidents that haunt the nation regularly. Akhilesh Yadav, the young chief minister has succeeded little in bringing any positive change in the state but yet his party and its supremo and his father, the veteran Mulayam Singh Yadav, are considered to be the permanent symbols of secularism, unlike say Narendra Modi, who is communal politics personified for eternity.

Sorry, not all riots appeal to our conscience.

Riots are not new in India. But what is new is that we have learned to differentiate between two types of riots in our political discourse. One is a type that suits our convenient conscience and we love to drag on the debate over it. Example: the Gujarat riots of 2002. The other doesn't appeal much to our conscience and we are very comfortable in alienating it from our conscience. Example: the innumerable riots that often take place in northern India. Besides, Assam is geographically too far away while Kashmir is too sensitive to handle.

The second category of riots is far more diverse for they feature attacks on various kinds of minorities, not just the religious ones. But strangely, the ‘secular' leadership and media of the country never bother to take up a campaign against these riots. The only reason to regret is the 2002 riot in Gujarat, or more precisely, the chief minister of the state, Narendra Modi.

UP and Bihar governments love to target the common enemy.

The SP has zero control on the state administration. Yet, it feels to ignite communal politics in the guise of secularism or rather minority appeasement and put the commoners' lives at risk. There is a nice similarity between the ruling parties of both UP and Bihar. Both the SP and JD(U) claim themselves to be the messiah of minorities but none rally care for good governance and development. Nitish Kumar was known for his development model but he ruined his own reputation in June by terminating all ties with the BJP and putting his poll equation and consequently the governance factor in jeopardy.


The Nitish administration also uttered little about the arrest of Yasin Bhatkal, the dreaded terrorist, from the state. The SP was recently seen slamming the Modi administration over the explosive letter of DG Vanzara but exhibited unprecedented arrogance when it came to victimizing Durga Shakti Nagpal, also a public servant. Not a single word from any of the secular quarters are heard when these double standards are openly displayed. Strange indeed.

UP and Bihar parties always enjoy benefits of doubt

The Akhilesh Yadavs and Nitish Kumars always enjoy the benefit of doubt despite all odds because they belong to two very important states, electorally. Politicians like Mulayams have been nurturing their ambition to become the prime minister for years despite the riots and corruption charges but surprisingly, the ambition is termed as 'greed' when it applies to BJP's Narendra Modi. How many politicians do not dream to become the prime minister, especially in this era of coalition politics? Akhilesh is inexperienced? Okay, but so was Modi But yet, it is said that Akhilesh Yadav is a fresher in the business and hence does not have enough control over the state administration. In February 2002, Modi was just four-month-old as the chief minister of Gujarat. Akhilesh has not succeeded in curbing riots in Uttar Pradesh, a trend which was seen even during the days of his father, and has also allegedly encouraged communal politics as a ‘secular response' to the saffron camp's Hindutva politics in Ayodhya.

Gujarat, on the other hand, has not seen a single riot after 2002 while it used to be frequently rocked by communal clashes prior to that. What is also disappointing that the likes of Mulayam and Akhilesh are never heard of speaking on how to improve governance and quicken development. May be for them, it is politically viable if India remains backward and engaged in communal animosity. In India, the 'secular' is more 'communal', isn't it? But they still get away with it.

Read more at: Endless UP riots, yet India doesn

 

[Parul]

If one will go details into the matter, then will find, its just a fight between brothers of harassed sister and the man who harassed their sister. Why the hell mob attacked those two guys and farmers. Is it correct, minor community can do anything what they want to do in this secular country?

 

[Tshering22]

Because this is secular terrorism.

I know the word sounds a little too extreme but terror isn't only through guns and grenades. It is also spread through mass targeting of the communities that are actually the victim. Which is exactly what puts people off.

One thing is clear; NDTV, IBN-7 and many other key media channels are sold out. They are showing as if Muslims were sitting saintly under their trees and meditating and a bunch of mainstream Hindus came out and attacked them. What disgusted me further is as to how Akhilesh Yadav (the same loser who let Muslims vandalize Buddha park for Secularist vote), wore a skull cap and came in front of the camera.

Anything for power huh? Even if it means destroying many innocent people's lives.

Absolutely disgusted with UPites for choosing such goons and terrorist lovers.

 

[IndoCarib]

^^^^

Your signature says it all

 

[Invincible INDIAN]

Because this is secular terrorism.

I know the word sounds a little too extreme but terror isn't only through guns and grenades. It is also spread through mass targeting of the communities that are actually the victim. Which is exactly what puts people off.

One thing is clear; NDTV, IBN-7 and many other key media channels are sold out. They are showing as if Muslims were sitting saintly under their trees and meditating and a bunch of mainstream Hindus came out and attacked them. What disgusted me further is as to how Akhilesh Yadav (the same loser who let Muslims vandalize Buddha park for Secularist vote), wore a skull cap and came in front of the camera.

Anything for power huh? Even if it means destroying many innocent people's lives.

Absolutely disgusted with UPites for choosing such goons and terrorist lovers.

Yesterday 2 trucks of explosives and weapons were captured from a village Rathoda (near Chapprolli) Baghpat district UP from Muslims custody.

 

[IndoUS]

Anything that can win vote for the politicians, and anything that can make money for the Media.

 

[dharaputra]

finally.. somehow an unbiased report from NDTV

Muzaffarnagar riots: a meeting after Friday prayers exploited by politicians

Muzaffarnagar: The prelude to the riots that have ripped through Muzaffarnagar in Western Uttar Pradesh killing at least 30 unfolded in the village of Kawal, where in the last week of August, two Jat brothers killed a Muslim boy who was stalking their sister. Less than an hour later, they were then lynched to death.

To check the tide of communal tension, local officials banned public meetings. But just three days later, on a Friday, politicians extinguished any chance of a return to normal. After Friday prayers, a meeting was called by religious leaders and politicians in Muzaffarnagar, around 125 km north east of Delhi.

With an audience of about 2,000 people, most of them Muslims, local leaders from the Congress and Mayawati's Bahujan Samaj Party or BSP took the stage.

When asked why they didn't intervene to have the meeting cancelled, local officials claimed they had been misled. Kaushal Raj, the District Magistrate of Muzaffarnagar, said that religious leaders had said the meeting would focus on collecting a petition demanding justice in the Kawal case, but that the gathering was then hijacked by the politicians - Qader Rana and Jameel Ahmed of the BSP, and Saeed-uz-zaman of the Congress. All three feature now in an FIR or police case on charges that include inciting communal tension. While Mr Rana, who represents Muzaffarnagar in Parliament was not available for comment, his colleague said that the rally had been sanctioned by local officials. Saeed-uz-zaman's son said the politicians had done no wrong, legally or morally.

The opposition BJP, accused of instigating violence this weekend at a gathering of thousands of Hindu farmers, says that at the Friday session, the District Magistrate was on stage. Kaushal Raj told NDTV, he was blackmailed by the politicians who said that if he did not attend the meeting, they would march to a communally sensitive part of the city.

The BJP also says that two leaders from the ruling Samajwadi Party were present at the gathering, but have not been featured in police cases.

On Saturday evening, at a maha-panchayat, BJP leaders from the area addressed thousands of farmers with allegedly incendiary speeches, charges they have denied. On their way home, farmers were attacked and killed. Since then, 36 people have died.