Why are you so covering up the problem. Is it because elephant rearing and beating is more of a Keralite or mallu problem?
I remember flicking through the channels in my youth while in Lucknow and noted that there was an entire movie on the elephant tusks being imported by arabs or rather muslims. Sheikh Zayed the ruler of the UAE was a villain in this movie. But then in India elephants are beaten and abused by Hindus but that doesn't raise eyebrows. As I said India is deeply polarized between Hindu and Muslim. If a muslim does something wrong all hell breaks loose but when a Hindu does it the reaction is mum.
All guys are involved in purposely covering up the problem, denying it exists... rather than accept it and work to resolve it. That is the first step to solving the problem but Indians are locked in a belief of their superiority and thus never admit they are wrong.
So you are arguing that you mallus
cannot harm animals? As I said in my first post the best option for all animals would be to be raised by animal specialists not temple authorities who barely know how to treat them. Our own area in Lucknow is filled with dogs and cows and the rooftops dominated by monkeys. They are pests. People cannot even pass the narrow streets because of these animals. They belong to pens and cages or with trained professionals who can give them the love and care they need.
Personally I don't have a love of the elephant as such but am committed to showing the differential treatment for muslim and hindu. I have done so vividly.
Why do the Indians look down at muslims eating meat? Its their choice and their right. Many mallus eat these delicious kebabs too. So aren't they hypocritical as they eat meat yet shout for the protection of the cow?