Elements in ISI supporting terrorists: U.S.

[SMC]

Its not about 'might' and 'are', its the third time in this past week that fingers are being raised at Pakistan's state organization and army supporting act of terrorism. Its not India, this time its former head of the state and Pakistan's neutral ally.

Who the **** cares if it's the US and how often they are doing it. How often did you hear before Iraq war that Iraq had WMDs. Very few people trust the words of the US state anymore when it comes to these sorts of issues, mostly tea partiers. Well, except the Indians. Don't overestimate how popular this conspiracy theory is in the west.

They have not provided any evidence, and that brings this story (i.e. a conspiracy theory) to and end.

 

[Hawkish]

Who the **** cares if it's the US and how often they are doing it. How often did you hear before Iraq war that Iraq had WMDs. Very few people trust the words of the US state anymore when it comes to these sorts of issues, mostly tea partiers. Well, except the Indians. Don't overestimate how popular this conspiracy theory is in the west.

They have not provided any evidence, and that brings this story (i.e. a conspiracy theory) to and end.

Every one has the right to put their in the sand and think that all of these are media hype.
Go ahead, do it. But when you come out of the hibernation, be prepared for the shock.

 

[Illusive]

Who the **** cares if it's the US and how often they are doing it. How often did you hear before Iraq war that Iraq had WMDs. Very few people trust the words of the US state anymore when it comes to these sorts of issues, mostly tea partiers. Well, except the Indians. Don't overestimate how popular this conspiracy theory is in the west.

They have not provided any evidence, and that brings this story (i.e. a conspiracy theory) to and end.

And its always Pak who pleads US to mediate the Kashmir issue only to be shown the middle fingers, and you talk about who the **** cares. Its not something only US have been telling. You might remember UK primes visit to India.

 

[arya]

ISI supporting terrorism and RAW/CIA/Mossad supporting friendship & Cricketmatch haina ?

yes bhia jaan sahi farmaya

 

[SMC]

And its always Pak who pleads US to mediate the Kashmir issue only to be shown the middle fingers, and you talk about who the **** cares. Its not something only US have been telling. You might remember UK primes visit to India.

Yeah, and? UK PM also said, along with US, that Iraq had WMDs. Man I really can't believe how much of simpletons some of you guys are. So parts of the west say x, hence x must be true. Besides that being a logical fallacy, it's unbelievable how that is sometimes your main argument.

 

[Illusive]

Yeah, and? UK PM also said, along with US, that Iraq had WMDs. Man I really can't believe how much of simpletons some of you guys are. So parts of the west say x, hence x must be true. Besides that being a logical fallacy, it's unbelievable how that is sometimes your main argument.

Keep your personal remarks to yourself. If you keep arguing about WMDs then there's no point talking to you cause you simply don't wanna get it. Whats logical here is to wait and watch, its easy for you to conclude that anyone arguing Pakistan state sponsored terrorism is a blatant lie and fools.

 

[SMC]

Keep your personal remarks to yourself. If you keep arguing about WMDs then there's no point talking to you cause you simply don't wanna get it. Whats logical here is to wait and watch, its easy for you to conclude that anyone arguing Pakistan state sponsored terrorism is a blatant lie and fools.

What? WMDs are very relevant as it shows how governments do propaganda and feed their people false info which the public easily buys.

So since evidence has not been provided, we should wait and watch the future, while in the case of Indian support for terrorism in Pakistan, it's a closed case since no evidence has been provided. A double standard, no?

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

garbage article......somebody said ''mirich masala'' and i couldnt agree more

incidentally, CIA works closely with - and to a large extent is very reliant on the ISI as far as Afghanistan is concerned. Can the U.S. themself distinguish good from "bad"? Not sure if they have this capability


therefore if the article is to be believed, U.S. works with elements who have ties to terrorism.


one could easily turn around and bring up the fact that U.S. contractors in Afghanistan relayed bag-loags of cash to the (Afghan) Taleban (which is a U.S. enemy). What to make of that then?


We get the drill by now

these public statements by a few irrelevant civilian officials come out, and are eventually either buried or forgotten.


no big deal