Eid Special: Beef (beef Meat) recipes

[fitpOsitive]

Cow meat is very popular in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Middle East, America, UK, even in some states of India.

Eid is almost round the corner. So thought to have a thread dedicated to Beef recipes.

Bangladeshi style beef recipe

Pakistani style beef recipe

Indian style beef recipe

American style beef recipe

Chinese style beef recipe

Turkish style beef recipe

Why you exclusively wrote Cow meat? Wasn't beef sufficient to write? Thats the attitude sparking this minor issue to heights. If it is halal for you, even then you should respect other religions, to whom this animal is more than just an animal.

 

[Sodium]

Why you exclusively wrote Cow meat? Wasn't beef sufficient to write? Thats the attitude sparking this minor issue to heights. If it is halal for you, even then you should respect other religions, to whom this animal is more than just an animal.

May be because there is huge difference in Kara Beef (Water Buffalo meat / beef) and Cow / Bull beef and definitely Cow / Bull ans especially Bachiya (Young Cow) is the best in taste.

 

[lastofthepatriots]

This thread has made me so hungry.

 

[SirHatesALot]

Rip to all cows

 

[SarthakGanguly]

That's propotionally that same amount of animals slaughtered in india for entire year

I don't know man. I understand that empathy, morals and conscience is measured by different standards in your mazhb/land/etc, but I can't celebrate the fact that millions are to be slaughtered in a day. Yeah, I accept you slaughter more. Kudos.

What about sentiments of Muslims while safron chadiz advocating banning Burqa or Hijab.

Burqa is not Islamic. Reverence to cow is an important Dharmic concept common to Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists.
Only a few educated folks of the Sangh Parivar call for the banning of Burqa. On the other hand, almost all Muslims slaughter cows.

I understand the main motive. It is to prove a point. I get that. And Hindus are too cowardly to challenge this either.

 

[AUz]

I don't know man. I understand that empathy, morals and conscience is measured by different standards in your mazhb/land/etc, but I can't celebrate the fact that millions are to be slaughtered in a day. Yeah, I accept you slaughter more. Kudos.


Burqa is not Islamic. Reverence to cow is an important Dharmic concept common to Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists.
Only a few educated folks of the Sangh Parivar call for the banning of Burqa. On the other hand, almost all Muslims slaughter cows.

I understand the main motive. It is to prove a point. I get that. And Hindus are too cowardly to challenge this either.

Majority of Muslims slaughter goats/lambs on Eid festival, and they don't do it to "make a point"...

Stop being ridiculous!

Also, I didn't know Sikhs and Buddhists also revere cows. Why is cow revered by dharmic/Hindu religion btw?

And I am in favor of slaughtering cows this year because of hindu extremist/RSS bullshit of making Muslims drink pee and beating Muslim women and even killing a Muslim guy all because they "suspected" these Muslims were involved in transfer of cow meat.

So Crazy Hindus/RSS can suck out collective dicks when millions of Pakistanis will slaughter cows throughout our homeland

Otherwise, I personally prefer goat slaughter on Eid. But this year, I have told my family to partner up and slaughter a cow (and ironically, the meat might go on one Islamic seminary near our home. Icing on cake, I guess!)

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Majority of Muslims slaughter goats/lambs on Eid festival, and they don't do it to "make a point"...

Stop being ridiculous!

Also, I didn't know Sikhs and Buddhists also revere cows. Why is cow revered by dharmic/Hindu religion btw?

And I am in favor of slaughtering cows this year because of hindu extremist/RSS bullshit of making Muslims drink pee and beating Muslim women and even killing a Muslim guy all because they "suspected" these Muslims were involved in transfer of cow meat.

So Crazy Hindus/RSS can suck out collective dicks when millions of Pakistanis will slaughter cows throughout our homeland

Otherwise, I personally prefer goat slaughter on Eid. But this year, I have told my family to partner up and slaughter a cow (and ironically, the meat might go on one Islamic seminary near our home. Icing on cake, I guess!)

Your previous post made it clear. Even in this post you mention the 'reason' quite clearly.

So let me reiterate what you wish to do - 'Kill Pakistani cows because in 3 cases Indian animal protection activists beat up cow traders in India'.

What would an innocent Pakistani cow say to that? 'Sacrifice me to avenge the Hindu atrocities?' Why not try to hunt down those whom you consider the real criminals?
Or are you too scared to do that and willing to let go off the steam by letting it on an animal?

Otherwise, I personally prefer goat slaughter on Eid. But this year, I have told my family to partner up and slaughter a cow (and ironically, the meat might go on one Islamic seminary near our home. Icing on cake, I guess!)

How insecure can one be?

Enjoy anyway.

 

[AUz]

Your previous post made it clear. Even in this post you mention the 'reason' quite clearly.

So let me reiterate what you wish to do - 'Kill Pakistani cows because in 3 cases Indian animal protection activists beat up cow traders in India'.

Animal protection "activists" made Muslim guys drink piss? Great. Sure, they were "activists" Who do you think you are fooling here?

What would an innocent Pakistani cow say to that? 'Sacrifice me to avenge the Hindu atrocities?' Why not try to hunt down those whom you consider the real criminals?

We don't have Pakistani police force governing india--otherwise we would have pursued those criminals.

Btw, Pakistani cows accept their fate happily on Eid

Or are you too scared to do that and willing to let go off the steam by letting it on an animal?

Scared? of Hindus?!

They are cowards in their own (and only) home.

Our ISI backed movements in india killed thousands of most pure of Hindus (Hindu Pandits), looted their properties, destroyed their temples, and forced them to leave their ancestral lands in hundreds of thousands--And you think any Pakistani would be scared of hinuds?

Unlike us, you aren't a part of a gigantic, global civilization spread across the globe throughout various continents. You Hindus just have one home, one land where you form a majority.

And even here, you are binded by secularism and cant establish a state based on your culture, lifestyle, and so on--moreover you have fallen below 80% threshold and are poised to be 76% by 2050...

You must take care of your own misery first...

Pakistan is in a much better position with its Islamic constitution, undeniable supremacy of Islamic culture within out land, and a rock solid 97% Muslim majority with our military forces openly declaring Islam as their ideological cornerstone and what not.

And that's just Pakistan. Global Islamic peoples have many, many more such states with even greater wealth, power, and influence across the globe..

So we are fine, secure, and increasing--Mashallah to all that!

You take care of your own state first...

How insecure can one be?

Enjoy anyway.

Not insecure. Ruthlessly geared towards survival and responding to even minor, micro aggression from others with our own answers in our own way.

That's how you survive in this brutal world..

For example, after Babri Masjid was demolished---we not only demolished hundreds of hindu temples wherever we could--our assets also lit Mumbai on fire with multiple bombings in single day--killing hundreds of innocents and maiming many more..

Result? Hindus haven't dared to touch Islamic symbols in india again...

THE BEST you could do was to change the name of Aurangzeb road

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Animal protection "activists" made Muslim guys drink piss? Great. Sure, they were "activists" Who do you think you are fooling here?



We don't have Pakistani police force governing india--otherwise we would have pursued those criminals.

Btw, Pakistani cows accept their fate happily on Eid



Scared? of Hindus?!

They are cowards in their own (and only) home.

Our ISI backed movements in india killed thousands of most pure of Hindus (Hindu Pandits), looted their properties, destroyed their temples, and forced them to leave their ancestral lands in hundreds of thousands--And you think any Pakistani would be scared of hinuds?

Unlike us, you aren't a part of a gigantic, global civilization spread across the globe throughout various continents. You Hindus just have one home, one land where you form a majority.

And even here, you are binded by secularism and cant establish a state based on your culture, lifestyle, and so on--moreover you have fallen below 80% threshold and are poised to be 76% by 2050...

You must take care of your own misery first...

Pakistan is in a much better position with its Islamic constitution, undeniable supremacy of Islamic culture within out land, and a rock solid 97% Muslim majority with our military forces openly declaring Islam as their ideological cornerstone and what not.

And that's just Pakistan. Global Islamic peoples have many, many more such states with even greater wealth, power, and influence across the globe..

So we are fine, secure, and increasing--Mashallah to all that!

You take care of your own state first...



Not insecure. Ruthlessly geared towards survival and responding to even minor, micro aggression from others with our own answers in our own way.

That's how you survive in this brutal world..

For example, after Babri Masjid was demolished---we not only demolished hundreds of hindu temples wherever we could--our assets also lit Mumbai on fire with multiple bombings in single day--killing hundreds of innocents and maiming many more..

Result? Hindus haven't dared to touch Islamic symbols in india again...

THE BEST you could do was to change the name of Aurangzeb road

Thanks for the detailed answer.
@Rain Man @Levina @scorpionx @litefire @Tridibans @he-man @waz @salarsikander

I love your honesty.

Code: Parikrama I.iv 53

 

[kobiraaz]

Beef kaleji

@Riyad Is it called Kala Bhuna in BD?

Ok Edit I realiized it is Kaliza bhuna

 

[AUz]

Thanks for the detailed answer.
@Rain Man @Levina @scorpionx @litefire @Tridibans @he-man @waz @salarsikander

I love your honesty.

Code: Parikrama I.iv 53

Thanks man!

I am always honest (and others too actually).

I remember I answered honestly once before and you did the same thing (Tagging bhartis and showing the 'true' face of how Pakistanis feel--I guess that's the motive?)..

Well, not going to change much--would it?

Hindus have a centuries long internalized nature of pacified behavior, pluralism, and so on. And hinduism itself is so "disintegrated", pacifistic at times, and lacking a central message...While Muslims--through their history, culture, and experience--have a certain civilizational discipline...certain survival instinct--that separates them from most other communities--and Islam is such an organized religion with strict focus on a central message.

All of this makes Muslims/Islam as a civilizational force very successful everywhere it exists. Hindus...don't have much of a chance.

It doesn't mean Hinduism will end or we will overrun Hinduism--no no! Thing is, Muslims, in general, will always be more ardent followers of their worldview and would tolerate less space for others than Hindus.

You see the point I'm making?

Now, tagging even entire PDF wouldn't make much a difference because billions of hindus in india wouldn't see this honesty here, AND wouldn't even think about it at all. Nor do Muslims think about it--but subconsciously--Hindus behave/act/live like I described above and Muslims too...

I have seen it in real life. Muslims, even the nicest one's, are bit more 'stern' (to put in most mildly) in their beliefs, act, worldview, religious adherence than say Indian Hindus/Sikhs etc.

In the long run, this 'sternnesss' is a great civilizational advantage in evolutionary terms... especially here in West where our communities are establishing their roots and are new here. Muslims more strictly adhere to marrying within the community, have far higher rates of adhering to Islam than Hindus adhering to hinduism, and have higher birth rates as well (thanks to religious/cultural discipline). This makes Islamic community grow here not only in numbers, but also Islam as a culture/religion grows because kids born in Islamic households adhere to Islam more so than kids of say Sikhs and so on..All of this creates a situation whereby Islam "beats" hinduism/sikhism in establishing itself and making it presence feel in new, previously unexplored lands..

You'll agree with me if you understood my points in this post...

 

[Hasan89]

I love BEEF. And the Bangladeshi style beef curry is delicious. I've heard, apparently Indian beef cow meat are tasty. wish I was in BD, at the time of Eid Ul Adha because I would have bought an Indian cow, and given it for Qurbani, and distributed to the poors!

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Thanks man!

I am always honest (and others too actually).

I remember I answered honestly once before and you did the same thing (Tagging bhartis and showing the 'true' face of how Pakistanis feel--I guess that's the motive?)..

Well, not going to change much--would it?

Hindus have a centuries long internalized nature of pacified behavior, pluralism, and so on. And hinduism itself is so "disintegrated", pacifistic at times, and lacking a central message...While Muslims--through their history, culture, and experience--have a certain civilizational discipline...certain survival instinct--that separates them from most other communities--and Islam is such an organized religion with strict focus on a central message.

All of this makes Muslims/Islam as a civilizational force very successful everywhere it exists. Hindus...don't have much of a chance.

It doesn't mean Hinduism will end or we will overrun Hinduism--no no! Thing is, Muslims, in general, will always be more ardent followers of their worldview and would tolerate less space for others than Hindus.

You see the point I'm making?

Now, tagging even entire PDF wouldn't make much a difference because billions of hindus in india wouldn't see this honesty here, AND wouldn't even think about it at all. Nor do Muslims think about it--but subconsciously--Hindus behave/act/live like I described above and Muslims too...

I have seen it in real life. Muslims, even the nicest one's, are bit more 'stern' (to put in most mildly) in their beliefs, act, worldview, religious adherence than say Indian Hindus/Sikhs etc.

In the long run, this 'sternnesss' is a great civilizational advantage in evolutionary terms... especially here in West where our communities are establishing their roots and are new here. Muslims more strictly adhere to marrying within the community, have far higher rates of adhering to Islam than Hindus adhering to hinduism, and have higher birth rates as well (thanks to religious/cultural discipline). This makes Islamic community grow here not only in numbers, but also Islam as a culture/religion grows because kids born in Islamic households adhere to Islam more so than kids of say Sikhs and so on..All of this creates a situation whereby Islam "beats" hinduism/sikhism in establishing itself and making it presence feel in new, previously unexplored lands..

You'll agree with me if you understood my points in this post...

I agree with all of your points.

You are Gold man.

All of this makes Muslims/Islam as a civilizational force very successful everywhere it exists. Hindus...don't have much of a chance.

I doubt the civilization part only. Else, all is true.

Ghazwas, ISIS, Crusades (I know not your fault), religious wars, unashamed brutality and its glorification - I find it difficult to call that a force of civilization. The Egyptian, Sumerian, Mesopotamian, Byzantine, Persian etc civilizations have perished.

But then that is what happens when native cultures fail to defend themselves. You have a point and I agree with the underlying message.

I quoted others so that they remember this post - they will share this message among their friends - Hindus are pacifist idiots by and large. Many may start questioning their lethargy when dealing with even survival issues. Those who still remain passive will perish.

 

[AUz]

Ghazwas, ISIS, Crusades (I know not your fault), religious wars, unashamed brutality and its glorification - I find it difficult to call that a force of civilization. The Egyptian, Sumerian, Mesopotamian, Byzantine, Persian etc civilizations have perished.

These wars, blood, conflicts, and what not are the very founding stone of civilization.

Look at Europeans, look at Muslims---these two peoples have arguably waged more wars over a more sustained period of time than anybody else out there..

And only these two peoples have created global civilization across continents...

If early Muslims were pacifists, Islam would have been annihilated in its earliest stage or AT BEST would have survived as a local desert cult confided to Hejaz region of today's Saudi Arabia.

But look at it now...it is a global civilization/culture shaping the lives of billions, forming the constitutional basis of various powerful nation-states, and shaping the culture across the globe in multiple continents!

It's easy to say it today---but in previous times, where there was no law, it was all fight for the survival and expansion. Those who did it successful are better off now compared to those who didn't show the willingness to go beyond their borders and risk-it-all for their own expansion and ultimate survival..

Islamic Civilization, established globally across various continents!, is all set to encompass 1/3 of humanity as human expansion reaches its peak (towards 11, 12 billion number).

Islamic World is on path to be the largest civilization at the time of humanity's PEAK...the largest/most global culture...and with gigantic amount of overall power (still not the most powerful as it remained for almost a thousand years before--but still, one of the most powerful/influential overall).

It wouldn't be the case if early Islamic peoples "gave in" infront of giant Romans and Persians, and didn't fight for their survival and expansion in 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th centuries---ultimarely conquering huge swaths of previous empires, peoples, and spreading across Africa, Asia minor, Arabia, India, Central Asia, and beyond...

Now, the world/humanity has achieved "stability" and there's no military conquest and culture-change possible as in previous times. So all these "gains" globally have become permanent--so those peoples who did made those "gains" have the most benefit (Europeans and Muslims)---while all others are localized, and will most likely stay so forever.

Muslims have no even established their civilizational/culture presence in the heartlands of Europe and wider Western World---something that wasn't done at this scale previously.

Islamic Civilization is the only global/major civilization still "spreading/expanding" everywhere--while all others have either stalled or even regressing in terms of depopulation.

By 2050, Islam would be 10% of Europe (up from 5% today) and 18% in India (up from 14%)---while both of these major peoples/cultures are either stalled or decreasing.

And Mashallah to all of above

I quoted others so that they remember this post - they will share this message among their friends - Hindus are pacifist idiots by and large. Many may start questioning their lethargy when dealing with even survival issues. Those who still remain passive will perish.

The problem for hindus today isn't that of being pacifist--since there's no threat of military overrun as it was before previously---thanks to technological advancements.

The challenge for Hindus is to keep their culture and expand within themselves (a battle which they aren't winning).

 

[SarthakGanguly]

These wars, blood, conflicts, and what not are the very founding stone of civilization.

Look at Europeans, look at Muslims---these two peoples have arguably waged more wars over a more sustained period of time than anybody else out there..

And only these two peoples have created global civilization across continents...

If early Muslims were pacifists, Islam would have been annihilated in its earliest stage or AT BEST would have survived as a local desert cult confided to Hejaz region of today's Saudi Arabia.

But look at it now...it is a global civilization/culture shaping the lives of billions, forming the constitutional basis of various powerful nation-states, and shaping the culture across the globe in multiple continents!

It's easy to say it today---but in previous times, where there was no law, it was all fight for the survival and expansion. Those who did it successful are better off now compared to those who didn't show the willingness to go beyond their borders and risk-it-all for their own expansion and ultimate survival..

Islamic Civilization, established globally across various continents!, is all set to encompass 1/3 of humanity as human expansion reaches its peak (towards 11, 12 billion number).

Islamic World is on path to be the largest civilization at the time of humanity's PEAK...the largest/most global culture...and with gigantic amount of overall power (still not the most powerful as it remained for almost a thousand years before--but still, one of the most powerful/influential overall).

It wouldn't be the case if early Islamic peoples "gave in" infront of giant Romans and Persians, and didn't fight for their survival and expansion in 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th centuries---ultimarely conquering huge swaths of previous empires, peoples, and spreading across Africa, Asia minor, Arabia, India, Central Asia, and beyond...

Now, the world/humanity has achieved "stability" and there's no military conquest and culture-change possible as in previous times. So all these "gains" globally have become permanent--so those peoples who did made those "gains" have the most benefit (Europeans and Muslims)---while all others are localized, and will most likely stay so forever.

Muslims have no even established their civilizational/culture presence in the heartlands of Europe and wider Western World---something that wasn't done at this scale previously.

Islamic Civilization is the only global/major civilization still "spreading/expanding" everywhere--while all others have either stalled or even regressing in terms of depopulation.

By 2050, Islam would be 10% of Europe (up from 5% today) and 18% in India (up from 14%)---while both of these major peoples/cultures are either stalled or decreasing.

And Mashallah to all of above



The problem for hindus today isn't that of being pacifist--since there's no threat of military overrun as it was before previously---thanks to technological advancements.

The challenge for Hindus is to keep their culture and expand within themselves (a battle which they aren't winning).

You are mistaking 'empires' for 'civilization'. Islam is rapidly spreading in Nigeria for example. Expansion - yes. Civilization? No.

Replace the word 'civilization' with 'empire' and you are right entirely.

So all these "gains" globally have become permanent

Nothing is permanent. Absolutely nothing is permanent.