Cherub786
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Lieutenant.jpg)
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
- Messages
- 822
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Did you just agree? So, Herzl doesn't count, the architect of Zionism! but subsequent foot soldiers do... interesting takeaway.
But forget about all of the above... since your argument is based on historic settlement... Do tell me when was the last time they ruled and inhabited that land?
Did Muslims exile them?
On what terms did Aelia(Jerusalem) accede to Muslim rule under Umar(R.A.) and what did their clauses demand of Muslim rule?
The architects of the Two Nation Theory were modernists. It was not originally construed as a religious idea, but subsequently Islamic Ulama analyzed it and justified it in light of Islamic Scriptures and theology, for example, Maulana Zafar Usmani who penned a text refuting Husain Ahmad Madani's Composite Nationalism. You simply have the same dynamic in the Jewish world regarding their internal debate on the religious validity of Zionism - religiously observant Rabbis on both sides of the debate disagreeing as to whether Zionism is in accord with Judaism or not.
The Arabs conquered Jerusalem in the 7th century, but has it always been under the same regime, dynasty, or state since then? Why should the modern day Palestinian nationalist movement be considered the rightful heir of sayyidina Umar's رضى الله عنه conquest of the Holy Land from the Romans and not the State of Israel? It's absurd to even discuss such a point. You're tying to say that the Jews welcomed sayyidina Umar's liberation of the Holy Land from the Romans who persecuted them, especially during the time of Heraclius which was still fresh in their collective memory at that point. Does that mean they agreed to be perpetually ruled by the Muslims for the next dozen centuries and more? Please be logical.
The British liberated the Punjabi Muslims from the oppression of Ranjit Singh's successors through the Anglo-Sikh wars. Muslims of Punjab by and large welcomed the British for relieving them of the yoke of the Sikhs. Does that mean the Muslims of Punjab consented to perpetual rule by the British and Pakistan shouldn't have been created?