What's new

Economic zones to create 1cr jobs, boost export by $40 billion

China got tonnes of State owned companies run by proffesional with government roles just owning large share holder or rights and let the SOE pick up their own managerial staff through share holder meeting. The almost same case happened in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, the government just sit and reap the benefit through dividen shares and annual tax, and only intervene when sit hit the fan or extraordinary cases.
Exactly, as long as SOE runs like a private enterprises and operates in a market economy (ie full competition), the ownership is not that relevant.

Apart from SOE, there are council owned enterprises and community owned enterprises (eg utility companies), which are proven just as efficient and as profitable as private ones.
 
Last edited:
Exactly, as long as SOE runs like a private enterprises and operates in a market economy (ie full competition), the ownership is not that relevant.
The problem in our country is stealing from SOE. Besides the law for government employees are rigid and they can not be terminated. All SOE in BD became loss making with huge debt.
 
For a sustained growth FDI should not go above 5% of your GDCF.

LOL. So 4.9% is fine...but 5.1% is bad? Where do you even dig this shit up lol.

We should double our FDI intake from the current level.

Yes its just an "intake" valve that you control....with everyone just dieing to invest into you lol.

A big rabble of people (wanting to be let in) squished against the "closed/open" sign door of the BD shop. BD must take some more of these poor sods in!
 
LOL. So 4.9% is fine...but 5.1% is bad? Where do you even dig this shit up lol.
It depends. In some of the year Chinese FDI crossed as much as 10% which is ok. But mostly it hovered around 5-8%.
 
2.5 billion?
I doubt initial investment is 2.5 billion. may be 1-1.5 billion. I actually dont know.
Bashundara had a investment of 1.2 billion in a Refinery in Chittagong too and is in progress.
 
It depends. In some of the year Chinese FDI crossed as much as 10% which is ok. But mostly it hovered around 5-8%.

So why did you choose 5% then and not 8 or 10 %.

10% "which is ok"....so erm lol wut.

Whats wrong with it passing 10% or any dbl digit number?
 
Are you a retard or something.. I am sorry, you are so irritating.
Because we dont want to get stuck in the middle income trap..
The way i see is, BD doesnt have large scale MNC corporation conglomerate groups working at global scale and have a niche to grow and outcompete their competitor. Many newly developing countries have one or two or many, especially in high tech, finance or manufacturing or other fields. Like Sokor have LG, SAMSUNG, daewoo, Malaysia have Petronas and Maybank, India have reliance, Tata corps, Singapore have DBS, STK, Indonesia have Indofood, BCA, Pertamina, China have many the like of Haier, HUAWEI, alibaba, tencent and other. They can work wonder and propel the economy significantly with their growth
 
Last edited:
The way i see is, BD doesnt have large scale MNC corporation conglomerate groups working at global scale and have a niche to grow and outcompete their competitor. Many newly developing countries have one or two or many, especially in high tech, finance or manufacturing or other fields. Like Sokor have LG, SAMSUNG, daewoo, Malaysia have Petronas and Maybank, India have reliance, Tata corps, Singapore have DBS, STK, Indonesia have Indofood, BCA, Pertamina, China have many the like of Haier, HUAWEI, alibaba, tencent and other. They can work wonder and propel the economy significantly with their growth
How can we be multi national when we dont allow our companies to invest overseas.
Our government think we are not there yet.
 
Its not my theory but economic theory. For a sustained growth FDI should not go above 5% of your GDCF.
Instead of talking from imagination can you just tell us which page of the economic theory says about the limitation of FDI to a mere 5%? Is it applicable also for the Golden Bangladesh where technology is completely absent?

Simply speaking, depending upon the scale of investment FDI provides thousands or millions of jobs and it is the job that matters for people as well as the country. When other countries are soliciting FDIs left and right it is you who is talking of negative nonsense. Anyway, give us the book/page of your imaginative economic theory.

The GoB is full of your kind of ignorant/uneducated craps. This is why it does not allow the locals or foreigners to build even a factory to produce sewing machines and needles. How about agriculture machines, tools, and implements? Yet, you guys talk of a developed Golden Bangladesh only in 2041. A developed country is not something that falls down like the leaves from a mango tree at random.
 
Instead of talking from imagination can you just tell us which page of the economic theory says about the limitation of FDI to a mere 5%? Is it applicable also for the Golden Bangladesh where technology is completely absent?

Simply speaking, depending upon the scale of investment FDI provides thousands or millions of jobs and it is the job that matters for people as well as the country. When other countries are soliciting FDIs left and right it is you who is talking of negative nonsense. Anyway, give us the book/page of your imaginative economic theory.

The GoB is full of your kind of ignorant/uneducated craps. This is why it does not allow the locals or foreigners to build even a factory to produce sewing machines and needles. How about agriculture machines, tools, and implements? Yet, you guys talk of a developed Golden Bangladesh only in 2041. A developed country is not something that falls down like the leaves from a mango tree at random.

It already got answered with a great amount of intelligence and deep thought:

Are you a retard or something.. I am sorry, you are so irritating.
Because we dont want to get stuck in the middle income trap..

Yet, you guys talk of a developed Golden Bangladesh

Well topcat is more into talking about the Golden Horde, his direct mongol ancestors!
 
Instead of talking from imagination can you just tell us which page of the economic theory says about the limitation of FDI to a mere 5%? Is it applicable also for the Golden Bangladesh where technology is completely absent?

Simply speaking, depending upon the scale of investment FDI provides thousands or millions of jobs and it is the job that matters for people as well as the country. When other countries are soliciting FDIs left and right it is you who is talking of negative nonsense. Anyway, give us the book/page of your imaginative economic theory.

The GoB is full of your kind of ignorant/uneducated craps. This is why it does not allow the locals or foreigners to build even a factory to produce sewing machines and needles. How about agriculture machines, tools, and implements? Yet, you guys talk of a developed Golden Bangladesh only in 2041. A developed country is not something that falls down like the leaves from a mango tree at random.
With too much salt you gonna ruin the curry... Most of the country in south east had bitter experience.
The countries for example Korea, Taiwan, China who managed a balance became economic super power. Those who did not for example Indonesia, Thailand lost the steam and got stuck. The exceptions are city state like SG and HK whio have different economic dynamics.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom