DRDO to shoot down missile at 150 km altitude

[angeldemon_007]

i asked before also...
Why do you need this much range ??/ are you going to destroy missiles before launching ?/ But thats not possible....

 

[Kinetic]

First at an altitude of 47 km, then 80 km, now 150 km after that 300 km!!! Destroying ballistic missiles are the trickiest job in missile arena. PDV is a milestone for Indian BMD capability. It has solid booster instead of liquid like PAD. It has IIR seeker. It seems like they have postponed PDV test in 2010.

i asked before also...
Why do you need this much range ??/ are you going to destroy missiles before launching ?/ But thats not possible....

Thats the job of IAF!

 

[Guynextdoor]

i asked before also...
Why do you need this much range ??/ are you going to destroy missiles before launching ?/ But thats not possible....

Exoatmospheric IRBM missiles like Ghauri become realistic targest, especially coz they aren't MIRV and so getting one means getting all.

 

[Guynextdoor]

You Indians are in fantasy land. China has successfully tested an indigenous BMD. And China does not claim based on its test that it already has a deployed BMD.

China: Missile defense system test successful - USATODAY.com

But self-deluding Indians think they are more advanced than China and Russia. It's not that you have "a long way to go." Even Chinese would agree we have a long way to go. It's that you are living in a third world hole that has no conception of reality.

There is simply no comparison. India is rubbish compared to China in every way possible. Too stupid to realize it.

Isn't there any Indian thread that you don't troll in?

 

[General General]

Pakistani missiles already are capable of going up to 350 km in altitude, that's why India is looking towards developing an anti-missile system that can reach near that altitude.

 

[angeldemon_007]

Exoatmospheric IRBM missiles like Ghauri become realistic targest, especially coz they aren't MIRV and so getting one means getting all.

Sorry i couldn't get your reply ??/ We can still destroy Ghauri with our BMD shield. Remember the first phase of our BMD which is almost complete was aimed at Pakistani missiles. The next phase would be meant for ICBM and might be increase accuracy against MIRVs.

 

[Guynextdoor]

Sorry i couldn't get your reply ??/ We can still destroy Ghauri with our BMD shield. Remember the first phase of our BMD which is almost complete was aimed at Pakistani missiles. The next phase would be meant for ICBM and might be increase accuracy against MIRVs.

SOme missiles don't have an atmospheric trajectory. Look at Agni and you'll see that the top part of the missile is black in color- that's the ceramic enclosed warhead. WHen they come down into the atmosphere they're too fast to be intercepted. Exoatmospheric interception means killing them before they start their target descent.

 

[alpha proton]

First of all what India is testing is not mid course interceptors,India currently had not tested or had not planned for mid course interceptors.

Only U.S,Russia and China posses that capacity,it is used to shoot down ICBM's

As claimed by many China is not the second nation to achive it,it was Russia,the missile is known as A-135.



I saw some Chinese making a comment that Russia is behind China and Russian's r incapable,and I think some Indian also claimed that Russia is decades ahead of China.

That Indian whoever was that made a completely wrong statement,China is not decades behind the Russian,they r generation's behind,but unfortunately some fanboys not understand it here.

About Indian ABM ,its exoatmospheric interceptor and India is the 4th nation to develop it after U.S, Russia and Israel.

It is used against IRBM's.

So far China is not known to have any Exo or endo atmospheric capability though they claim that some of their long range sam's likeHQ-19 and HQ-9.

And yes Chinese KT-3 missile can intercept any target at a height of more than 1000 kms(mid course).

 

[Guynextdoor]

@angeldemon: besides, killing any missile at longer range before they come to our territory is always a good thing. It also gives a multilayered system- if the first long range shield fails, you can activate a nearer range system.

 

[HongWu]

you guys don't qualify to say this. ripping off some Russian stuff and assembling it doesn't make you to qualify to comment on others. to comment you have earn technologies through R&D not through some reverse engineering.

Let's get real. Reverse engineering is R&D. Why would you want to invest more money re-inventing the wheel? Somebody else has already done it. Figure out how they did it and make one yourself.

India on the other hand, needs to be spoon fed by Russians and the West. But they withhold crucial technologies and give you TOT on relatively minor things like final assembling of a kit.

Even sadder is how India claims "indigenous" but when you dig a little deeper it always "sought assistance from" Russians or the West.

 

[deckingraj]

Let's get real. Reverse engineering is R&D. Why would you want to invest more money re-inventing the wheel? Somebody else has already done it. Figure out how they did it and make one yourself.

India on the other hand, needs to be spoon fed by Russians and the West. But they withhold crucial technologies and give you TOT on relatively minor things like final assembling of a kit.

Even sadder is how India claims "indigenous" but when you dig a little deeper it always "sought assistance from" Russians or the West.

Will it matter that the weapon is indigenous or is falsely claimed to be one??? As far as reverse R&D is concerned then it is definitely not a cake walk...but its serious drawback is innovation....Similarly re-inventing the wheel has a serious drawback which is significant time....What is need of the hour is the middle path...In other words even if we are getting tits bits of TOT this will help our indigenous efforts...Till then we have big list of vendors to sell us what we need....

Now may i humbly ask what was the serious urge to troll????

 

[Guynextdoor]

Let's get real. Reverse engineering is R&D. Why would you want to invest more money re-inventing the wheel? Somebody else has already done it. Figure out how they did it and make one yourself.

India on the other hand, needs to be spoon fed by Russians and the West. But they withhold crucial technologies and give you TOT on relatively minor things like final assembling of a kit.

Even sadder is how India claims "indigenous" but when you dig a little deeper it always "sought assistance from" Russians or the West.

Can you please keep off our threads. We don't want your trolling to derail ojur discussions.

 

[HongWu]

First of all what India is testing is not mid course interceptors,India currently had not tested or had not planned for mid course interceptors.

Only U.S,Russia and China posses that capacity,it is used to shoot down ICBM's

As claimed by many China is not the second nation to achive it,it was Russia,the missile is known as A-135.



I saw some Chinese making a comment that Russia is behind China and Russian's r incapable,and I think some Indian also claimed that Russia is decades ahead of China.

That Indian whoever was that made a completely wrong statement,China is not decades behind the Russian,they r generation's behind,but unfortunately some fanboys not understand it here.

About Indian ABM ,its exoatmospheric interceptor and India is the 4th nation to develop it after U.S, Russia and Israel.

It is used against IRBM's.

So far China is not known to have any Exo or endo atmospheric capability though they claim that some of their long range sam's likeHQ-19 and HQ-9.

And yes Chinese KT-3 missile can intercept any target at a height of more than 1000 kms(mid course).

Wow.... you are confusing so many ideas.

First off, when you talk about endo-atmospheric intercept, there are really two kinds of things. There is an intercept of a cruise missile (subsonic or ~1+ mach), which is no different from the intercept of a aircraft except they are smaller and harder to hit. All air-defense SAMs have this ability, theoretically.

Then there is the intercept of a ballistic missile. That is much harder because they travel faster. The easiest ballistic missiles to intercept are primitive ballistic missiles like Scuds (~mach 3). Advanced SAMs like Patriot III, S-300 series and HQ-9 have this ability.

The hardest ballistic missiles to intercept are ICBMs because they travel at ~mach 10. Nobody has this ability. US THAAD has been a failure so far.

Next, there is exo-atmospheric intercept. Only USA and China have done an exo-atmospheric intercept test (not even Russia). China did its first exo-atmospheric ballistic missile test in January 2010. This technology is very similar to ASAT. Only USA and China have done a direct ascent ASAT test. USSR did an ASAT test but it was not direct ascent -- it was a hunter satellite.

So the ranking is USA, China and Russia. You might tack on Israel at the end too if they are considered separate from USA because their mid-range endo-atmospheric interception is very good.

India appears nowhere. Its indigenous SAM is primitive and equivalent to 1960's technology. I doubt it could handle even a Scud.

But actually India won't be using indigenous, it will be using Israeli technology (maybe calling it indigenous whatever) and so its actual effectiveness will be considerable.

 

[Guynextdoor]

@ Hong Wu
Wrong and your usual BS:

Next, there is exo-atmospheric intercept. Only USA and China have done an exo-atmospheric intercept test (not even Russia). China did its first exo-atmospheric ballistic missile test in January 2010. This technology is very similar to ASAT. Only USA and China have done a direct ascent ASAT test. USSR did an ASAT test but it was not direct ascent -- it was a hunter satellite.


We did our exoatmospheric tests in 2007

THAAD Weapon System Conducts Successful Exo-Atmospheric Interceptor Test - Frontier India - News, Analysis, Opinion

 

[HongWu]

@ Hong Wu
Wrong and your usual BS:

Next, there is exo-atmospheric intercept. Only USA and China have done an exo-atmospheric intercept test (not even Russia). China did its first exo-atmospheric ballistic missile test in January 2010. This technology is very similar to ASAT. Only USA and China have done a direct ascent ASAT test. USSR did an ASAT test but it was not direct ascent -- it was a hunter satellite.


We did our exoatmospheric tests in 2007

THAAD Weapon System Conducts Successful Exo-Atmospheric Interceptor Test - Frontier India - News, Analysis, Opinion

LOL.... THAAD is Indian now?

More retardedness from Bharat. I guess malnutrition and open air defecation really affects childhood development.