DRDO tests submunition warheads for Pinaka I weapon system

[acetophenol]

Which was a complete failure.

Source?

 

[Indian Patriot]

Calm down trader,you don't have to tell me about Kargil war my blood relatives fought in Kargil and provide a source of your BS (pinaka not insas) and stop acting like a mature woman.

Calm down you son of a b1tch. I was the general under whom your fictitious relatives fought in Kargil war. You internet clowns are like a bunch of retarded fisher-women who can squat and make a lot of racket but contribute nothing of any value.

Read this and weep you crying little b1tch because that is what I will call you from now, a crying little b1tch.

'Pinaka' fails in mission parameters -The New Indian Express

 

[QARAMATIANS]

Calm down you son of a b1tch. I was the general under whom your fictitious relatives fought in Kargil war. You internet clowns are like a bunch of retarded fisher-women who can squat and make a lot of racket but contribute nothing of any value.

Read this and weep you crying little b1tch because that is what I will call you from now, a crying little b1tch.

om/states/odisha/Pinaka-fails-in-mission-parameters/2013/08/08/article1723720.ece']'Pinaka' fails in mission parameters -The New Indian Express[/URL]

Why are you moaning Nigga ? as i predicted you are a cheap mature prostitute .. Did some guys from from DRDO molested you when you were young ?

Anyway wipe you Clit with your mouth that media report just quoting a single test .

"tests were, however, conducted nearly two weeks after similar trials of the Pinaka Mark-II Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher System from Chandhan area in Pokhran field firing ranges of Rajasthan, which were stated as ‘successful’ by the DRDO. The trials were conducted by the DRDO and Indian Army."

 

[Indian Patriot]

Source?

.'Pinaka' fails in mission parameters -The New Indian Express

P.S. - Learn to search knowledge and read.

 

[HariPrasad]

Don't worry another version of NASR is on the way!

I remember Pakistani Members had doubled the range of Nsr on PDF to 120 KM until the news came in for 60 PM Test. Is the new version the same one. PDF Made 120 KM?

.'Pinaka' fails in mission parameters -The New Indian Express

P.S. - Learn to search knowledge and read.

So what . Test for new configuration often fails. After 45 successful test of Brahmis, recently one test failed. When you try to make system more potent and incorporate innovation, they often fails. It is rectified and weapon is made more versatile.

 

[kṣamā]

I remember Pakistani Members had doubled the range of Nsr on PDF to 120 KM until the news came in for 60 PM Test. Is the new version the same one. PDF Made 120 KM?

Dude they just read the news twice !!

 

[Indian Patriot]

So what . Test for new configuration often fails. After 45 successful test of Brahmis, recently one test failed. When you try to make system more potent and incorporate innovation, they often fails. It is rectified and weapon is made more versatile.

There is nothing wrong in failure. World leading defence manufacturers like Boeing and Lockheed also fail. Problem with Pinaka is that it has been failing for the last 20 YEARS.

And Pinaka first failed its "agni pariksha" during Kargil war. It was a complete flop with the rockets lacking both punching power and accuracy. It does not matter if the range of a rocket is 40 km or 400 km if the accuracy is non-existent (unless it carries a nuke).

 

[GR!FF!N]

Source?

Damn..you had to ask??

 

[HariPrasad]

There is nothing wrong in failure. World leading defence manufacturers like Boeing and Lockheed also fail. Problem with Pinaka is that it has been failing for the last 20 YEARS.

And Pinaka first failed its "agni pariksha" during Kargil war. It was a complete flop with the rockets lacking both punching power and accuracy. It does not matter if the range of a rocket is 40 km or 400 km if the accuracy is non-existent (unless it carries a nuke).

It has been successfully tested many times. When you incorporate new technologies to increase efficacy of weapon, there is always a chance of failure. Like our AAD failed in last test after 6 successful test. It is not actually the failure of weapon but the failure of integration of new technology incorporated in it.

 

[HariPrasad]

Dude they just read the news twice !!

What is there in 2 years old news when there are so many news of successful testing subsequent to that.

 

[acetophenol]

.'Pinaka' fails in mission parameters -The New Indian Express

P.S. - Learn to search knowledge and read.

So? Because The New Indian Express writes the Pinaka was a failure in Kargil,you'll confirm it? I can give you several other sources that say otherwise.

P.S: Be nice to people.

And you definitely should take a look into this:

^^^Screenshot of the source you gave,article from The New Indian Express, written by Hemant Kumar Rout claiming the Pinaka had a 'poor show during the kargil', essentially branding the Pinaka as a failure.

^^^ The same author(Hemant Kumar Rout), the same newspaper 'The New Indian Express', saying the 'Pinaka was successful in Kargil'.


So what do you say now?

@GR!FF!N ,@Kurup,@nair,@Water Car Engineer, @Abingdonboy,@HariPrasad and others.

Please take a look, the same damn reporter from the same damn newspaper twisting things to his convenience.

 

[HariPrasad]

And Pinaka first failed its "agni pariksha" during Kargil war

Totally Wrong. DRDO took an opportunity to use it in Kargil. Armed forces used it very precisely against target. Army impressed with pinaka and incorporated it in Army.

It does not matter if the range of a rocket is 40 km or 400 km if the accuracy is non-existent (unless it carries a nuke).

Accuracy is something which is build over a period of time in a weapon. As time passes, it is iteratively build in weapon. Pinaka had the accuracy. It is being augmented now with the satellite guidence.

As I gave you an example, weapons are tested in different modes and configuration. It is very much possible that they may fail in certain conditions. They are improved in this area.

 

[Manindra]

So? Because The New Indian Express writes the Pinaka was a failure in Kargil,you'll confirm it? I can give you several other sources that say otherwise.

P.S: Be nice to people.

And you definitely should take a look into this:

View attachment 234596

^^^Screenshot of the source you gave,article from The New Indian Express, written by Hemant Kumar Rout claiming the Pinaka had a 'poor show during the kargil', essentially branding the Pinaka as a failure.

View attachment 234597

^^^ The same author(Hemant Kumar Rout), the same newspaper 'The New Indian Express', saying the 'Pinaka was successful in Kargil'.


So what do you say now?

@GR!FF!N ,@Kurup,@nair,@Water Car Engineer, @Abingdonboy,@HariPrasad and others.

Please take a look, the same damn reporter from the same damn newspaper twisting things to his convenience.

New Indian Express have notorious record of false reporting specialy in defence.
May be they take help from Astrologer instead of going for press release

 

[acetophenol]

New Indian Express have notorious record of false reporting specialy in defence.
May be they take help from Astrologer instead of going for press release

I remember, for a Akash test, when everyone else reported success, Indian Express alone reported failure.

 

[Manindra]

I remember, for a Akash test, when everyone else reported success, Indian Express alone reported failure.

And Astra also.