Indian Patriot
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 3,000
- Reaction score
- -23
- Country
- Location
Defence Research and Development Organisation, commonly known as DRDO, was formed in 1958 to make India self-reliant in the field of defence production. The reality however has been painfully opposite.
Even since its induction he organisation has to show nothing but failure. It's very first task was Project Indigo where hey were supposed to make surface-to-air missiles. Needless to say Project Indigo was a failure. India even in 60s had to import weapons be it the centurion tanks, Mig-21, Jaguars etc. and even in 2015 it is still negotiating for acquisition of Rafale aircraft.
Far from being self-reliant India has had to become one of he world's largest, if not the largest, weapons importers. It is not a mater of pride but shame. India a country of 1.2 billion people is so helpless that they need to import arms and weapons for its security from foreign countries. Imports and production are two different things. Highest importer does not mean India is the highest producer or is any more powerful.
The most painful episode of India's foreign reliance came forward during he Bofors crisis. Bofors was blacklisted because of corruption. India was supposed to field 1,500 of hese cannons but thanks to scandal only about 400-450 were being inducted. Post bofors not a single, I repeat not a SINGLE, 155 arty gun has been inducted and for a quarter of a century Indian army is without a new arty gun. As of 2015 IA arty back-up remains very VERY poor.
In 1999 Kargil war the deficiency was evident. Barring Bofors other arty guns were inadequate or ineffective. The pakistanis had fire-finding radars which allowed them to pin-point Indian arty positions and rain accurate fire. Indians had no fire-finding radars and were fighting on the backfoot. US had offered India to sell fire-finding radars before 1999. But some geniuses in the DRDO came up saying they have the resources to make an "indigenous" fire finding radar and the US offer was rejected. Till date India is still waiting for the "indigenous"radar.
A lot of casualties took place in Kargil because Indian soldiers were poorly armed and equipped. They had the INSAS rifle which is first and foremost a piece of sh1t. The weapon is too heavy, inaccurate (contrary to what DRDO bhakts claim), lacks fire power, jams and is unreliable. Faced against AK-47 armed pakistanis he Indian jawans had a tough time fighting them back with 20 round magazines semi-auto, inaccurate INSAS.
Indian jawans also lacked bullet proof jackets, bullet proof helmets, night vision goggles, UAV support and a host of other equipment which was routine for many militaries across the world.
Being he DEFENCE - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT - ORGANISATION, it was the duty of DRDO to ensure IA was well equipped with he latest weapons and equipment. From 5.56 caliber rifles to 155 caliber arty guns DRDO failed everywhere. And oh, even the laser bombs dropped by IAF were imported FOREIGN MAAL. If Israel did not come to India's rescue then India would have lost Kargil.
So what good is DRDO?
Some DRDO bhakts claim Arjun and LCA are the "success story". Facts aside, even if we assume hat Arjun and Tejas are not the abject failures the fact still remains that both these machines operate on imported FOREIGN MAAL engines. That's right people, DRDO since its inception in 1958 has still not being able to make a successful tank or an aircraft engine.
On plane earth which has more than 190 countries not a SINGLE country is interested in DRDO made weapons. Nepal was stupid enough to buy INSAS during their civil war against maoists and they have been cursing and abusing the rifle ever since.
More than 57 years after DRDO was formed India still remains he world's highest arms importer speing money both in buying weapons and at the same time wasting money keeping a hopeless and worthless organisation like DRDO alive.
Isn't it time that private sector in India be given their rightful share of responsibility? Unlike DRDO the private sector has no unlimited funding but they have a sense of professionalism and a respect for deadlines. For 26 years DRDO failed but TATA teamed up with Denel to make India's 155 mm 52 cal arty gun. DRDO still cannot figure out what the full form of MRAP is, but private players have teamed up with foreign partners and are ready with prototypes.
So is DRDO really good for India? Should India really depend on DRDO and compromise national security or should India trust the private sector to ensure that it's future defence needs are met?
Please discuss.
Even since its induction he organisation has to show nothing but failure. It's very first task was Project Indigo where hey were supposed to make surface-to-air missiles. Needless to say Project Indigo was a failure. India even in 60s had to import weapons be it the centurion tanks, Mig-21, Jaguars etc. and even in 2015 it is still negotiating for acquisition of Rafale aircraft.
Far from being self-reliant India has had to become one of he world's largest, if not the largest, weapons importers. It is not a mater of pride but shame. India a country of 1.2 billion people is so helpless that they need to import arms and weapons for its security from foreign countries. Imports and production are two different things. Highest importer does not mean India is the highest producer or is any more powerful.
The most painful episode of India's foreign reliance came forward during he Bofors crisis. Bofors was blacklisted because of corruption. India was supposed to field 1,500 of hese cannons but thanks to scandal only about 400-450 were being inducted. Post bofors not a single, I repeat not a SINGLE, 155 arty gun has been inducted and for a quarter of a century Indian army is without a new arty gun. As of 2015 IA arty back-up remains very VERY poor.
In 1999 Kargil war the deficiency was evident. Barring Bofors other arty guns were inadequate or ineffective. The pakistanis had fire-finding radars which allowed them to pin-point Indian arty positions and rain accurate fire. Indians had no fire-finding radars and were fighting on the backfoot. US had offered India to sell fire-finding radars before 1999. But some geniuses in the DRDO came up saying they have the resources to make an "indigenous" fire finding radar and the US offer was rejected. Till date India is still waiting for the "indigenous"radar.
A lot of casualties took place in Kargil because Indian soldiers were poorly armed and equipped. They had the INSAS rifle which is first and foremost a piece of sh1t. The weapon is too heavy, inaccurate (contrary to what DRDO bhakts claim), lacks fire power, jams and is unreliable. Faced against AK-47 armed pakistanis he Indian jawans had a tough time fighting them back with 20 round magazines semi-auto, inaccurate INSAS.
Indian jawans also lacked bullet proof jackets, bullet proof helmets, night vision goggles, UAV support and a host of other equipment which was routine for many militaries across the world.
Being he DEFENCE - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT - ORGANISATION, it was the duty of DRDO to ensure IA was well equipped with he latest weapons and equipment. From 5.56 caliber rifles to 155 caliber arty guns DRDO failed everywhere. And oh, even the laser bombs dropped by IAF were imported FOREIGN MAAL. If Israel did not come to India's rescue then India would have lost Kargil.
So what good is DRDO?
Some DRDO bhakts claim Arjun and LCA are the "success story". Facts aside, even if we assume hat Arjun and Tejas are not the abject failures the fact still remains that both these machines operate on imported FOREIGN MAAL engines. That's right people, DRDO since its inception in 1958 has still not being able to make a successful tank or an aircraft engine.
On plane earth which has more than 190 countries not a SINGLE country is interested in DRDO made weapons. Nepal was stupid enough to buy INSAS during their civil war against maoists and they have been cursing and abusing the rifle ever since.
More than 57 years after DRDO was formed India still remains he world's highest arms importer speing money both in buying weapons and at the same time wasting money keeping a hopeless and worthless organisation like DRDO alive.
Isn't it time that private sector in India be given their rightful share of responsibility? Unlike DRDO the private sector has no unlimited funding but they have a sense of professionalism and a respect for deadlines. For 26 years DRDO failed but TATA teamed up with Denel to make India's 155 mm 52 cal arty gun. DRDO still cannot figure out what the full form of MRAP is, but private players have teamed up with foreign partners and are ready with prototypes.
So is DRDO really good for India? Should India really depend on DRDO and compromise national security or should India trust the private sector to ensure that it's future defence needs are met?
Please discuss.