What's new

Dr Stephen Cohen proposes Nuclear status & CNEA for Pakistan.

Kompromat

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
40,366
Reaction score
416
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Stephen Cohen proposes nuclear deal for Pakistan in new book

LIVE.Moment_Cohen.jpg


WASHINGTON - A top American expert on South Asia, Stephen Cohen, has advised the United States (US) to formally endorse Pakistan’s nuclear power status through civilian cooperation similar to what it had done for India about a decade ago.

In a new insightful book “Shooting for a Century: The India-Pakistan Conundrum,” Dr Cohen, a known authority on South Asia, argues that normalisation of relations between nuclear Pakistan and India is the most vital interest for the US.He delves deeply into positions Islamabad and New Delhi have long adhered to on some of the most contentious underlying causes of tensions between them and looks at the possible implications of these, particularly the longstanding Kashmir dispute.

“The United States has a strong interest in the normalisation of India-Pakistan relations that goes far beyond normal “good” ties to each of them. Their normalisation is more important than Afghanistan's stabilisation or building India up as a barrier to an expanding China,” Cohen writes. The author of “The Idea of Pakistan” and “The Future of Pakistan,” urges Washington to craft a new US approach to Pakistan-India normalisation and the South Asian region as a whole.

Cohen notes in the book that ironically, the one fear that steered US policy after the end of the cold war—nuclear proliferation— turns out to have important implications for India-Pakistan normalisation and “suggests further modification” in American policy.The United States, he says, should encourage the two neighboring states to take advantage of the reality of deterrence and work towards a stable nuclear regime, while maintaining the tightest control over use of the weapons.

“Washington went part way down this road when it entered into a civilian nuclear deal with India that legitimised New Delhi's nuclear status; it should find a formula that does the same for Pakistan, with the caveat that being a full member of the nuclear club means that Pakistan— and India— must assume the obligations set forth for nuclear weapons states under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT).”Analysing the US policy of de-hyphenation in its relations with Pakistan and India, Cohen sees the need for clarification.

De-hyphenation clearly needs to be redefined. I would not go so far as to call for “re-hyphenation,” but selective engagement in regional issues is called for.” The de-hyphenation policy, he views, said nothing about India-Pakistan relations. “There was merely a non-policy of hope that the two would not push their crises very far. Kashmir was off bounds, except for diplomatic urgings for normalcy, while other regional issues were addressed through a dysfunctional division of responsibility.”

The acclaimed expert is also critical of Washington's policy toward Pakistan, saying “events in Afghanistan have unduly shaped America's Pakistan policy,” and urges that Pakistan’s concerns about Indian role in Afghanistan must be worked into American policy calculations.
He proposes that the Obama administration’s South Asia policy needs to address the organisational dysfunctionality that handicaps American policy toward this quarter of the world. Although, Cohen devotes a lot of attention to the lingering Kashmir conflict in the book, he feels the issue should not be at the center of America's regional policy.

A US policy on these lines should, among other things, also explore the possibility of India-Pakistan strategic cooperation in Afghanistan, and retain some elements of de-hyphenation.
The expert notes that some in India might greet a new American initiative with skepticism, but the recently completed American policy document on India actually encourages regional cooperation, and a carefully crafted US initiative might be more welcome in New Delhi than previous efforts.
Doubts will exist on the Pakistan side, but America has stuck by Pakistan and its interest, like that of India's, is to see a stable democratic Pakistan emerge over the next decade, he says.
“Part of the new approach would be to confirm Pakistan's identity as a South Asian state,” Cohen says.


At the same time, Cohen points out that for normalisation to work, it must happen in both countries, not just one. Furthermore, the right people have to be talking to each other.
The US, for its part, should do everything it can to use its current cooperative programs with each state to encourage them to work together, and it should support all measures to bring about regional economic agreement and cooperation.

“Its guiding principle should be this: the pace of normalisation and cooperation must be dictated by the two regional states, not by America. At the same time, all parties must understand that American help is a necessary but not sufficient condition for regional normalisation to come about.” Cohen criticises the Obama administration’s approach to South Asia, saying it “failed to develop a South Asia policy that would have encompassed both India-Pakistan relations (including Kashmir) and the grinding war in Afghanistan.”

In this context, he reveals that in mid-2012 President Obama approved a classified national decision directive for India, but there was no such directive for South Asia, or for Pakistan. “The foreign policy process could not manage more: too many Pakistan policies were (and still are) circulating in the government with no coherent view of South Asia in the background.”

Stephen Cohen proposes nuclear deal for Pakistan in new book | Pakistan Today | Latest news | Breaking news | Pakistan News | World news | Business | Sport and Multimedia
 
.
It's unfortunate, but this article does not provide us enough of an understanding about what Dr. Cohen may have proposed - From the article all I have gathered is that : US is "grant" recognition of nuclear status, in return for signing and ratifying NPT and making progress towards resolution of issues with India.

So let me see if I understand this so far - What's in it for Pakistan? What will a civilian nuclear deal with US do for Pakistan, now?

Also, can someone explain the significance of this statement:

“Part of the new approach would be to confirm Pakistan's identity as a South Asian state,” Cohen says. The US is now to confirm Pakistani identity? But what the heck does it mean and how is that in any kind of Pakistani interest?
 
.
If someone don't accept Pakistan's nuclear status after having more than 100 Nukes than either that country's officials are naive or just showing hypocrisy.
 
.
So let me see if I understand this so far - What's in it for Pakistan? What will a civilian nuclear deal with US do for Pakistan, now?

> To accept Pakistan as a nuclear state and thus grant an exemption by the Nuclear Suppliers Group for supplying reactors as well as nuclear fuel. (This exemption is necessary as Pakistan is not a signatory of the NPT).

> No restrictions for building nuclear reactors for tiding over Pakistan's energy crises. (Remember, America will extract their pound of flesh in these massively expensive deals where Pakistan would be obliged to give these lucrative contracts to the Americans).

> The downside is the opening up of all Pakistani nuclear reactors to international inspections and ensure they conform to IAEA safeguards. Whether Pakistan is going to agree to this intrusiveness or not is the moot question.

> Pressurize Pakistan for signing the NPT.

Also, can someone explain the significance of this statement:

“Part of the new approach would be to confirm Pakistan's identity as a South Asian state,” Cohen says. The US is now to confirm Pakistani identity? But what the heck does it mean and how is that in any kind of Pakistani interest?
This one probably means to recognize Pakistan's sovereign status in order to bring to an end all unilateral actions against Pakistan like drone attacks and interference in its internal affairs as though it was a surrogate of the US of A.
 
.
> To accept Pakistan as a nuclear state and thus grant an exemption by the Nuclear Suppliers Group for supplying reactors as well as nuclear fuel. (This exemption is necessary as Pakistan is not a signatory of the NPT).

> No restrictions for building nuclear reactors for tiding over Pakistan's energy crises. (Remember, America will extract their pound of flesh in these massively expensive deals where Pakistan would be obliged to give these lucrative contracts to the Americans).

> The downside is the opening up of all Pakistani nuclear reactors to international inspections and ensure they conform to IAEA safeguards. Whether Pakistan is going to agree to this intrusiveness or not is the moot question.

> Pressurize Pakistan for signing the NPT.


This one probably means to recognize Pakistan's sovereign status in order to bring to an end all unilateral actions against Pakistan like drone attacks and interference in its internal affairs as though it was a surrogate of the US of A.

Rubbish! Pakistan cannot AFFORD to buy any nuclear plants from the US and does not need to buy them from the US - how is an end to unilateral actions related to South Asian identity?
 
.
Disarming Pakistan is in US interests, so they will not do give any sort of Nuclear Tech. to Pakistan & to be honest Pakistan needs to develop its nukes with the help of China.

US is desperate to disarm Pakistan, every now & then they keep saying BS statments on Pak nukes, that they(Pak Nukes) are not safe & etc.
 
.
For nuclear plants we have trusted partner - So, i don't think any advantage for Pakistan in this but more pressure to sign NPT and allow IAEA officials to monitor our nuclear facilities, Thanks but no thanks
 
.
If someone don't accept Pakistan's nuclear status after having more than 100 Nukes than either that country's officials are naive or just showing hypocrisy.
Wrong! Only countries that have signed the NPT have been recognized as nuclear weapon states. You can have a gazillion nukes, but that doesn't mean a thing.
 
.
......
Also, can someone explain the significance of this statement:

“Part of the new approach would be to confirm Pakistan's identity as a South Asian state,” Cohen says. The US is now to confirm Pakistani identity? But what the heck does it mean and how is that in any kind of Pakistani interest?

I guess US club Pakistan with Iran & Afghanistan while making their policies and ignore it's role in South Asia :undecided:
 
. .
I think America shot itself in the FOOT when it refused to make a similar Civilian Nuclear Deal with Pakistan. Today Pakistan is way ahead than India in Nuclear Weapons both in terms of Quality and Quantity, Pakistan it left Pakistan without any encumbrances.
 
.
I think America shot itself in the FOOT when it refused to make a similar Civilian Nuclear Deal with Pakistan. Today Pakistan is way ahead than India in Nuclear Weapons both in terms of Quality and Quantity, Pakistan it left Pakistan without any encumbrances.

LOL :cuckoo:
 
.
This has nothing to do with disarming Pakistan, which is an impossibility and bogus political slur, nor does it have anything to do with number of missiles ---
 
.
Just another article not based on present reality. For a deal for Pakistan to happen, the U.S. senate would have to approve the deal. The chance of that happening are abysmally low. George Bush had to spend a lot of his political capital in India's case even when the Indian lobby moved heaven & earth to get the senators to agree. Pakistan simply has no such support & Obama certainly doesn't have the political muscle to get that done, even if he was interested (Must remember that Obama might, on his own, not even given India that deal) Further support at the NSG would pretty much be non-existent in the case of Pakistan. Dr. Cohen suggesting such a deal is quite different from the number of Pakistanis who actually believe that such a thing can happen. Most Pakistanis, if they entertain hopes for such a deal are deluding themselves with a complete disconnect of how the world & America sees them & their country .
 
.
I think America shot itself in the FOOT when it refused to make a similar Civilian Nuclear Deal with Pakistan. Today Pakistan is way ahead than India in Nuclear Weapons both in terms of Quality and Quantity, Pakistan it left Pakistan without any encumbrances.
:woot: :rofl: You checked the quality? Who did? Now, I ain't talking of missiles. I'm talking about nukes. If you haven't tested any that you've loaded onto your delivery systems, how are you so sure of the quality? How do you know that they'll work at all?

Don't keep shooting from your hip. You're no authority on the subject. Or, can you provide a link to the quality of Pakistani nukes Vs Indian nukes?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom