Inception-06
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2007
- Messages
- 4,172
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
I hope Trump will be elected, that will make the us foreign policy very simple in relation to Pakistan. Foe or Friend ? War or Peace ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its not issue of nuclear weapon, its issue of small tactical weapon develop by Pakistan, which are more lethal and destructive then bigger one. India and Isreal are worried about since Pakistan develop small tactical weapons. A soldier or small jeep can carry around.
You left out one of the most important and the fastest growing category: America is 18% Latino. Many of those, if not most, are within your "white American" category, but they clearly are not within Trump's support group.I
White American 72.41%
African American 12.61%
Multiracial and Some other race 9.11%
Asian American 4.75%
The US needs to stay in Afghanistan because its immediate neighbour Pakistan has nuclear weapons which have to be protected, Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has said.
"I think you have to stay in Afghanistan for a while, because of the fact that you are right next to Pakistan, which has nuclear weapons and we have to protect that. Nuclear weapons change the game," he said.
Trump was responding to a question on Afghanistan during the Republican presidential debate on Thursday.
View attachment 296574
Really? You didn't take him seriously when he said "Ïndians are taking American jobs from us"......but today, he made a statement about Pakistan and you are running commercials?
I am as Republicans as they come. But allow me to tell you, this fool will break the Republican base. What he says (and does and show offs), has nothing to do with Republican agendas and values. A few thousand little to mid level educated people without any global experience making a "Trump Nation" don't count. The guy is a Con artists as Mitt Romney and others said it. He's not running for the Republican party, he's in business to RUIN the Republican base and damage it. Have you heard any of his speeches? 90% or more of the time, his mouth is too busy appreciating himself and showing off. 90+ percent of his speeches are "I, the trump, own this, that, I can deal with law suits, I do business worth billions, I have friends from Zoo to Muslims to Martians and the Chinese, who all tell me about things and exactly how to hate them and break the American society's civil fabric that keeps us together".
Post someone with credentials. Sadly, I've always considered Trump as my indirect mentor in some real estate deals. But this show off and a total lack of a Presidential personality isn't right for the us. This fool has Hitler like traits. No Republican family man or woman wants their kids to watch TV and hear about someone talking about his Penis, who is running for the US Presidency. This is like a Thug put on for a show. Democrats will have a field day on election day as this idiot will break our own vote base.
Watch, the Republican party doesn't want him either. There is an effort going on internally to deny him of the delegates he needs, to run for the nomination. Then, he may be forced to leave and do an independent run, which is much better than damaging the fabric of the Republican party, the principles, the rules and values we all stand for, UNITED under one flag
Why everyone has this impression that Pakistan is such a mess and someone has to shoulder the responsibility for its reckless behaviour. ?
My impression-- don't help Pakistan in any way, then they will have to earn the respectability and become one of comity of responsible nations.
You left out one of the most important and the fastest growing category: America is 18% Latino. Many of those, if not most, are within your "white American" category, but they clearly are not within Trump's support group.
It has do with more with Pakistan's behavior. There are around 8 nuclear powers and why only Pakistan is singled out every time? .
It has nothing to do with my not "having access to census data". It has everything to do with the specific data posted by the person I was responding to. His data made no reference to Latinos whatsoever so of course, that 18% in his data would mean they were part of his "white American" category. It's either that, or he thinks all Latinos have vanished from our country.That's actually untrue. By your statement, I can tell you've never had access to Census data. Hispanics are classified in different categories. The one's that list themselves as "White"have a ethnic field called "Hispanic White" that they go under.
For the SAME reason why Indian Hindu majority killing her minorities and conducting similar terrorism is totally ignored. That magic word is called "Trade" and a second supporting word is called "China". But sad part is, India will never fight the Chinese with the US. India wants the US and the Chinese to fight each other and weakened down. So India can be the super power........
So when one country is involved with terrorism, which is the worst thing to be involved with, sadly, we talk about their nukes. When another country, who does trillions of trade is involved in similar activities, we call them our strategic ally because of the huge amount of business we do with them. Pretty easy to understand right?
Read below from 2 days ago, go clean your own mess, before you can have the moral authority to bit*ch about others, as you are doing the same with different tactics!!
http://www.brecorder.com/top-news/w...o-protect-non-hindu-minority-communities.html
As I remember saying in one other thread, you need to stay on topic. This thread is about Trump and Pakistan nuke safety. Why bring Indian Hindu, Indian minorities, China - India war, China - US war, India and its superpower ambitions etc.. ect... into this. It is hard to form a counter argument with that range of topics you introduce in your posts.
It has nothing to do with my not "having access to census data". It has everything to do with the specific data posted by the person I was responding to. His data made no reference to Latinos whatsoever so of course, that 18% in his data would mean they were part of his "white American" category.
It's either that, or he thinks all Latinos have vanished from our country