Does India have MIRV (missiles)? If they are in making, then what is the status?

[AMCA]

Also the martians.

At least one of us has the capability to reach out to the martians while the other is still trying hard to infiltrate into Kashmir.

 

[I S I]

At least one of us has the capability to reach out to the martians while the other is still trying hard to infiltrate into Kashmir.

strong word. You don't even have the capability to reach your house toilet....because there isn't any....

 

[Han Patriot]

I doubt India has any deployed MIRVs.

They will shout it out loud if they have it. You don't have to spy on them, just minus 1-2 decades of any announced achievement for real operational stage.

At least one of us has the capability to reach out to the martians while the other is still trying hard to infiltrate into Kashmir.

Hmmmm, just wondering PSLV is more advanced than Chinese launchers? Why do you think China haven't send a probe to Mars.

 

[Indx-techs]

No problem for India. Just need to paint a Russian MIRV Missile & call it a Bhartia Vedic Tech.

It's pretty amusing to see how shamelessly one could claim victimhood as well as bragging rights at same instant.
I mean a few moments ago, they were mourning on their so called Kashmir Solidarity day and then creating a bunch of half informed threads & filling with trolls. Somebody's taking pride in being invader but pride isn't hurt when retributor is assigned with attributes of "oppressor". After losing, losing, losing and earning shame for decades, people become shameless, cheerleading the Chinese and trolling Indians over roadblocks in projects most of which Pakistan can't even dream to pursue alone.

For the matter of current instant,
India produces 90+ outta 94 existing missile technologies in world compared to 39 of Pakistan. Moreover, its Pakistan who needs to derive its stages from French & Chinese stuff.

Thrust vectoring systems, miniaturized computers with satellite navigation, solid rocket motors, spin stabilized boosters, heat shields and lot other things. For making an MIRV, list at least one which India hasn't produced or how many techs Pak has produced?

For nuclear stuff, I can put the series of kind of both LWR & HWR reactors India has made or making. Would like to know if Pakistan has an equivalent of IPWR900 or AHWR.

Indian strategic warheads are still too big and heavy and cannot fit in an MIRV configuration.

Existing missiles are made to carry strategic large warheads at first place.

Capability of accurate insertion of multiple satellites from single vehicles into varying orbits and exo atmospheric interception of a ballistic missile trajectory is clear demonstration of maturity of multiple/maneuverable delievery and ASAT/ABM systems. Although, miniaturization won't matter because making bigger missile with bigger thruster isn't a technological challenge for India.

Delievery systems done, come to miniaturized nukes, India has started an FBR recently to produce plutonium. Spherical implosion in plutonium based uncontrolled reaction is the characteristic of miniaturized nuclear bomb.

Now Pakistan, we know Pakistanis didn't test Plutonium warheads which are needed for miniaturization rather they tested HEU implosion type warheads to be replicated in plutonium type pit as New Labs facility at PINSTECH only came online.in may 1998 . So Pakistanis have not tested a Plutonium spherical implosion device but a Linear implosion device.

Although, while Pakistani nuclear doctrine is about using tactical nuclear bombs to neutralise India's large conventional forces in case of any Indian Military expedition inside Pakistan. Not mature enough, Pakistan's nuclear policy was clear to us till now.

But testing of Ababeel is a lot confusing here. I mean what's the relevance of having this MIRV missile?

Anyways,

This device upon detonation the high explosive will drive the pusher plate into the tamper, which will then begin linear implosion of the fissile mass which will not only compress the plutonium but will push it inward and away from the control rods the same time, the lip on the outside of each control rod will "catch" a small portion of the force from the explosive.

Won't give more than 10% efficiency without extensive testing.
May even achieve 50%-70% efficiency with extensive testing, may be I don't even with simulation or cold tests?
Regards

 

[rajiv sharma]

@Dubious

your futile attempt .

 

[I S I]

It's pretty amusing to see how shamelessly one could claim victimhood as well as bragging rights at same instant.
I mean a few moments ago, they were mourning on their so called Kashmir Solidarity day and then creating a bunch of half informed threads & filling with trolls. Somebody's taking pride in being invader but pride isn't hurt when retributor is assigned with attributes of "oppressor". After losing, losing, losing and earning shame for decades, people become shameless, cheerleading the Chinese and trolling Indians over roadblocks in projects most of which Pakistan can't even dream to pursue alone.

For the matter of current instant,
India produces 90+ outta 94 existing missile technologies in world compared to 39 of Pakistan. Moreover, its Pakistan who needs to derive its stages from French & Chinese stuff.

Thrust vectoring systems, miniaturized computers with satellite navigation, solid rocket motors, spin stabilized boosters, heat shields and lot other things. For making an MIRV, list at least one which India hasn't produced or how many techs Pak has produced?

For nuclear stuff, I can put the series of kind of both LWR & HWR reactors India has made or making. Would like to know if Pakistan has an equivalent of IPWR900 or AHWR.

Existing missiles are made to carry strategic large warheads at first place.

Capability of accurate insertion of multiple satellites from single vehicles into varying orbits and exo atmospheric interception of a ballistic missile trajectory is clear demonstration of maturity of multiple/maneuverable delievery and ASAT/ABM systems. Although, miniaturization won't matter because making bigger missile with bigger thruster isn't a technological challenge for India.

Delievery systems done, come to miniaturized nukes, India has started an FBR recently to produce plutonium. Spherical implosion in plutonium based uncontrolled reaction is the characteristic of miniaturized nuclear bomb.

Now Pakistan, we know Pakistanis didn't test Plutonium warheads which are needed for miniaturization rather they tested HEU implosion type warheads to be replicated in plutonium type pit as New Labs facility at PINSTECH only came online.in may 1998 . So Pakistanis have not tested a Plutonium spherical implosion device but a Linear implosion device.

Although, while Pakistani nuclear doctrine is about using tactical nuclear bombs to neutralise India's large conventional forces in case of any Indian Military expedition inside Pakistan. Not mature enough, Pakistan's nuclear policy was clear to us till now.

But testing of Ababeel is a lot confusing here. I mean what's the relevance of having this MIRV missile?

Anyways,
View attachment 537333
This device upon detonation the high explosive will drive the pusher plate into the tamper, which will then begin linear implosion of the fissile mass which will not only compress the plutonium but will push it inward and away from the control rods the same time, the lip on the outside of each control rod will "catch" a small portion of the force from the explosive.

Won't give more than 10% efficiency without extensive testing.
May even achieve 50%-70% efficiency with extensive testing, may be I don't even with simulation or cold tests?
Regards

YAWN

 

[randomradio]

Indian strategic warheads are still too big and heavy and cannot fit in an MIRV configuration.

Where on earth do you get such nonsense from?

 

[faithfulguy]

Where on earth do you get such nonsense from?

India should do nuclear tests. But it’s too wimpy to start again.

 

[AMCA]

Hmmmm, just wondering PSLV is more advanced than Chinese launchers? Why do you think China haven't send a probe to Mars.

Shouldn't that be a question you should be asking your govt? oh wait ! You cant

strong word. You don't even have the capability to reach your house toilet....because there isn't any....

How long did you think, you can get away by saying this? India has far better sanitation coverage than Pakistan, maybe that justifies you lots constant urge to infiltrate into India

 

[I S I]

How long did you think, you can get away by saying this? India has far better sanitation coverage than Pakistan, maybe that justifies you lots constant urge to infiltrate into India

No, mujahideens infiltrate to teach you how to shit your pants every time you crave for some more a$s beating from Pakistan.

 

[khanmubashir]

It's pretty amusing to see how shamelessly one could claim victimhood as well as bragging rights at same instant.
I mean a few moments ago, they were mourning on their so called Kashmir Solidarity day and then creating a bunch of half informed threads & filling with trolls. Somebody's taking pride in being invader but pride isn't hurt when retributor is assigned with attributes of "oppressor". After losing, losing, losing and earning shame for decades, people become shameless, cheerleading the Chinese and trolling Indians over roadblocks in projects most of which Pakistan can't even dream to pursue alone.

For the matter of current instant,
India produces 90+ outta 94 existing missile technologies in world compared to 39 of Pakistan. Moreover, its Pakistan who needs to derive its stages from French & Chinese stuff.

Thrust vectoring systems, miniaturized computers with satellite navigation, solid rocket motors, spin stabilized boosters, heat shields and lot other things. For making an MIRV, list at least one which India hasn't produced or how many techs Pak has produced?

For nuclear stuff, I can put the series of kind of both LWR & HWR reactors India has made or making. Would like to know if Pakistan has an equivalent of IPWR900 or AHWR.

Existing missiles are made to carry strategic large warheads at first place.

Capability of accurate insertion of multiple satellites from single vehicles into varying orbits and exo atmospheric interception of a ballistic missile trajectory is clear demonstration of maturity of multiple/maneuverable delievery and ASAT/ABM systems. Although, miniaturization won't matter because making bigger missile with bigger thruster isn't a technological challenge for India.

Delievery systems done, come to miniaturized nukes, India has started an FBR recently to produce plutonium. Spherical implosion in plutonium based uncontrolled reaction is the characteristic of miniaturized nuclear bomb.

Now Pakistan, we know Pakistanis didn't test Plutonium warheads which are needed for miniaturization rather they tested HEU implosion type warheads to be replicated in plutonium type pit as New Labs facility at PINSTECH only came online.in may 1998 . So Pakistanis have not tested a Plutonium spherical implosion device but a Linear implosion device.

Although, while Pakistani nuclear doctrine is about using tactical nuclear bombs to neutralise India's large conventional forces in case of any Indian Military expedition inside Pakistan. Not mature enough, Pakistan's nuclear policy was clear to us till now.

But testing of Ababeel is a lot confusing here. I mean what's the relevance of having this MIRV missile?

Anyways,
View attachment 537333
This device upon detonation the high explosive will drive the pusher plate into the tamper, which will then begin linear implosion of the fissile mass which will not only compress the plutonium but will push it inward and away from the control rods the same time, the lip on the outside of each control rod will "catch" a small portion of the force from the explosive.

Won't give more than 10% efficiency without extensive testing.
May even achieve 50%-70% efficiency with extensive testing, may be I don't even with simulation or cold tests?
Regards

And who told u that Pakistan didn't test plutonium devices in 98 Sonny
Now its been revealed that plutonium program of pak was going on along side uranium enrichment program perhaps even earlier as we had small research reactor since 50s the kind u rigged to make plutonium for your first bomb we just kept plutonium program secret and kept all limelight on uranium program and according to western estimate our plutonium stock is much bigger then heu so logically the nukes we tested in chaghi some of em were plutonium based




As for pinstech its civilian research and engineer training institution they run degree programs for students sonny google so it ain't our nukes development center but churns out the engineers and not just nuclear but chemical metallurgy chemical etc who can be employed in our strategic institutions and a lot of em also join private sector so obviously we would not place weapons r&d equipment there but basic research one

 

[AMCA]

No, mujahideens infiltrate to teach you how to shit your pants every time you crave for some more a$s beating from Pakistan.

But piss their pants instead .

 

[Safriz]

Where on earth do you get such nonsense from?

Indians and their colour pencil drawings.
Where did you get these from

 

[Chhatrapati]

bura na maano Meme hai. @Retired Troll
View attachment 537432

At least your thought process coincide with Terrorists.

 

[AMCA]

bura na maano Meme hai. @Retired Troll
View attachment 537432

Does not take much time making Memes over Peshawar school attack as well ! Bura na Manno, cant stoop down to your level