Does India have a history of 10000 years?

[Gibbs]

These treads remind me of these..

 

[Mugwop]

View attachment 362391

Taj Mahal was originally a Shiva temple and a Rajput palace named Tejo Mahalaya seized by Shah Jahan and adopted as a tomb.

The very famous Vatican city came from Vaatika, meaning the garden in sanskrit.

Russia, Again Virat Hindu Country whos name was derived from Rishiya, meaning the land of rishis in sanskrit.

Saudi Arabia, is also a Virat Hindu Country whos name came from the words Saudh-arrva-sthaan, meaning having the smell of horses, later known as Arbhasthaan.

Britain, Brihathsthaan was the ancient name in sanskrit, meaning a big popular country.

America, was a Virat Hindu Country, Its name was derived from a sanskrit word Amarathwam which means immortal, the land which is immortal was the meaning of
ancient name of America, it was Amaraka.

Korea was a Virat Hindu Country, Its name was Gauriya in sanskrit.

Isreal, this word came from word Eeswaralaya, meaning the house of in sanskrit

Japan, This name came from Nippon, its ancient name was nipuna rajya which is from sanskrit.

SIBERIA, its ancient name was shibira in sanskrit.

 

[abc123xyx]

as i mention many a time before , if anyone has to find the roots of india or hinduisum ( sanatan dharma ) then he has to first take shalter of the sanskrit language.....

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

Taj Mahal was originally a Shiva temple and a Rajput palace named Tejo Mahalaya seized by Shah Jahan and adopted as a tomb.

The very famous Vatican city came from Vaatika, meaning the garden in sanskrit.

Russia, Again Virat Hindu Country whos name was derived from Rishiya, meaning the land of rishis in sanskrit.

Saudi Arabia, is also a Virat Hindu Country whos name came from the words Saudh-arrva-sthaan, meaning having the smell of horses, later known as Arbhasthaan.

Britain, Brihathsthaan was the ancient name in sanskrit, meaning a big popular country.

America, was a Virat Hindu Country, Its name was derived from a sanskrit word Amarathwam which means immortal, the land which is immortal was the meaning of
ancient name of America, it was Amaraka.

Korea was a Virat Hindu Country, Its name was Gauriya in sanskrit.

Isreal, this word came from word Eeswaralaya, meaning the house of in sanskrit

Japan, This name came from Nippon, its ancient name was nipuna rajya which is from sanskrit.

SIBERIA, its ancient name was shibira in sanskrit.

 

[Sanchez]

If you can only talk it is called legends. If you have written down things it is called history.

 

[randomradio]

If you can only talk it is called legends. If you have written down things it is called history.

Dinosaurs are legends?

 

[lastofthepatriots]

Many Indians like to insult Pakistanis for adopting Islam and saying that we have taken Arab culture as our own. That's really not the case, but the irony in which they say it is hilarious.


They like to claim Afghanistan all the way to Thailand is a hindu effort directed by themselves, when the thing is that they steal the basis of their culture from Pakistani IVC. What do these dravidians have to do with IVC?

They will never give a straight answer.

 

[TISSOT]

This is just their best guess. And Sankrit and ancient Persian split up at about the same time. That evidence point toward Aryan invasion.

This is not a "guess". This is an accurate map based on Genetic Mapping. It does not get any more real than this.

That Persian has evolved out of Sanskrit becomes obvious when you observe that sanskrit has evolved into a perfect language with perfect grammar that ensures there is no corruption during transmission. The same is not true for Persian or any other language n the world.

This is strengthen by the migration patterns and the fact that their own ancient religion "Zoroastrianism" has branched out of Hinduism and has very close relation to Vedic practices.

Do we have written artifacts from 3000 BC in India?

The oldest found written script is the Indus valley script which is not yet deciphered and that is over 3000 BC. This is about the same time as the Kali Calendar.

The oldest deciphered "Brahmi" script is dated 300 BC and all our current script has evolved out of Brahmi script, including the one's used in South East Asia.

The calendar used before the Kali calendar was called the Saptarsi Calendar which starts in 12,676 BC .

 

[faithfulguy]

If you can only talk it is called legends. If you have written down things it is called history.

If something happened in 1500 BC but it's only written down in 300 BC. Those are also legends. It's not historical accurate unless is written within the lifetime of the event.

This is not a "guess". This is an accurate map based on Genetic Mapping. It does not get any more real than this.

That Persian has evolved out of Sanskrit becomes obvious when you observe that sanskrit has evolved into a perfect language with perfect grammar that ensures there is no corruption during transmission. The same is not true for Persian or any other language n the world.

This is strengthen by the migration patterns and the fact that their own ancient religion "Zoroastrianism" has branched out of Hinduism and has very close relation to Vedic practices.



The oldest found written script is the Indus valley script which is not yet deciphered and that is over 3000 BC. This is about the same time as the Kali Calendar.

The oldest deciphered "Brahmi" script is dated 300 BC and all our current script has evolved out of Brahmi script, including the one's used in South East Asia.

The calendar used before the Kali calendar was called the Saptarsi Calendar which starts in 12,676 BC .

Indus Valley script may not be scripts. They could just be drawings such as decorations as there are not enough symbols, unlike Egyptian hieroglyphics, to mean something.

Also, no serious linguist accept that Persians originated from Sanskrit. Both originated from the same source is the common belief. And that source is outside of India. That is why Aryan invasion is the accepted belief and model. But these are all conjectures as there were no written records about that time of history.

 

[TISSOT]

If something happened in 1500 BC but it's only written down in 300 BC. Those are also legends. It's not historical accurate unless is written within the lifetime of the event.

Which would be impossible since the record of such writing might not survive expect inside a Pyramid made of Huge blocks of stone.

But the records have been passed over by rote learning for thousands of years and the precision of the sanskrit grammar has ensured that there is minimal to no distortion.

Indus Valley script may not be scripts. They could just be drawings such as decorations as there are not enough symbols, unlike Egyptian hieroglyphics, to mean something.

Also, no serious linguist accept that Persians originated from Sanskrit. Both originated from the same source is the common belief. And that source is outside of India. That is why Aryan invasion is the accepted belief and model. But these are all conjectures as there were no written records about that time of history.

The indus scrip is a script because the characters repeats itself like in a script. There is no confusion regarding that. They are found both on coins and on tablets.

There is nothing to indicate that Sanskrit originated outside India except Bigotry and Bias. Especially since Sanskrit does not exist anywhere outside India.

Sanskrit is the refined form of the ancient language in which the Ramayana was written. For e.g. Ramayana do not carry the same precise grammar of Sanskrit even though its in sanskrit. Same is true for Persian.

ITs is the lack of precision in Persian that make people conclude it is the same age as sanskrit.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

I have a history of 4 years in this forum.....

 

[Viny]

Many Indians like to insult Pakistanis for adopting Islam and saying that we have taken Arab culture as our own. That's really not the case, but the irony in which they say it is hilarious.


They like to claim Afghanistan all the way to Thailand is a hindu effort directed by themselves, when the thing is that they steal the basis of their culture from Pakistani IVC. What do these dravidians have to do with IVC?

They will never give a straight answer.

Do you know when the IVC was discovered by Charles Masson or when Alexander Cunningham found the city of Brahminabad in 1856, even the father of Pakistan was not born forget about Pakistan.

Do you see the name India in the given below ORIENS PERSIA INDIA map published in 1747

source: http://www.antique-maps-online.co.uk/india-middle-east-2364.html

 

[Kambojaric]

These treads remind me of these..

Amazing show, and this character presents the chest thumping Indian nationalist in the most hilarious way possible

 

[My-Analogous]

Pre Indus 7500-3300 ( Archaeological Evidence )
Indus Valley Civilization 3300-1900 ( Archaeological Evidence )
Aryans 1900-1000 ( No Archaeological Evidence , just corrupt understanding of Vedas by European Scholars )
Iron Age 1000-500 ( Archaeological Evidence )

From 500 BCE onward we have written proofs .

What you Indian claim is not your history and belong to the people where they are and that is Pakistan. Our history is start more then you guys imagine. Here is the link prove that Pakistan have a million years old history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riwat

Do you know when the IVC was discovered by Charles Masson or when Alexander Cunningham found the city of Brahminabad in 1856, even the father of Pakistan was not born forget about Pakistan.

Do you see the name India in the given below ORIENS PERSIA INDIA map published in 1747

source: http://www.antique-maps-online.co.uk/india-middle-east-2364.html

The Name India come from Indus and India try to hijack that and when Indus was there even great great grand father of India was there. Next time watch your month before speak

 

[TISSOT]

The Name India come from Indus and India try to hijack that and when Indus was there even great great grand father of India was there. Next time watch your month before speak

The name "China" comes from the Sanskrit word "sina" for that land.

The name "Man" comes from the sanskrit word "Manu".

The name India is what the outsiders called us, we called our-self Bharat. Hence "Maha Bharat"

WE still do.