Does God exist?

[I spikes therefore I am]

Does God exist?

can some one please define GOD

Can u able to define u?

 

[sreekimpact]

Can u able to define u?

bad answer ..another question for a question....
u answer my question first

 

[I spikes therefore I am]

bad answer ..another question for a question....
u answer my question first

Even u can't define urs but u want to define god? ok can u able define candle light focusing on wic direction? can u able point out water molecules in milk? again questions haaa . just see my location that's the ans.

 

[Bratva]

It's Avatars for which are incarnations of the Supreme being like Rama and Krishna who were sent for mankind

Those avatars are usually prophets who are sent for mankind to bring them back on track of monotheism and make them worship one supreme being only instead of making these prophets a part of supreme being and start worshiping avatars and supreme beings together.

 

[divya]

Dont know about god exists or not... unending debate but I Do EXIST... so o humans start praying My existence is confirmed.

 

[divya]

Hinduism is an ancient mythological ideology that emanates from a a historic time period in which man was ignorant of the world and Universe. Since then we have had a scientific revolution which helps to explain the laws governing the Universe, laws of physics, we understand the gasses, materials, particles, heat, that helped to form the Universe, we can even determine the age the Universe which is approximately 14 billion years old, we can explain the creation of the solar system, we understand nebulas, we understand angular momentum, we can now explain genetic mutations, DNA, RNA, cells, and much more.



None of which your religion can do. Your religion can't even provide a damn scrap of evidence for one out of hundreds of millions of Gods it proclaims exist.

Not a single piece of scientific evidence.

The later puranic view asserts that the universe is created, destroyed, and re-created in an eternally repetitive series of cycles. In Hindu cosmology, a universe endures for about 4,320,000,000 years (one day of Brahma, the creator or kalpa)[5] and is then destroyed by fire or water elements. At this point, Brahma rests for one night, just as long as the day. This process, named pralaya (Cataclysm), repeats for 100 Brahma years (311 trillion, 40 billion human years) that represents Brahma's lifespan. It must be noted that Brahma is the creator but not necessarily regarded as God in Hinduism. He is mostly regarded as a demigod or devata.

 

[T90TankGuy]

i believe there is a god . i believe it because of certain events in my life . can i prove it ? NO
but then thats faith !!! you take everything on things you cant see, hear, touch,taste,or smell to be the absolute truth.

 

[harshad]

if you want to know whether god exists wait for a maximum of 100years(unless you live to be 150 or more) you can have your answers then

 

[OrionHunter]

Of course God exists! His name is Hafiz Saeed, the all merciful. Peace be upon him!!

 

[harshad]

Of course God exists! His name is Hafiz Saeed, the all merciful. Peace be upon him!!

he is not god zaid hamid is

 

[acetophenol]

Any deists here?-say,god exists but religions su/cks!

 

[gambit]

Long time ago i read a book in arabic written by Mustafa Mahmood (an egyptian) it is called انا و صديقي الملحد or حوار مع صديقي الملحد “me and my atheist friend" or "debate with my athest friend" i am not sure of the name of the book

In it he writes about his encounters with atheists and in one place while debating an athiest he wrote:

Mustafa: You dont believe in the existence of something unless proven by feeling it or touching it or smelling.

Athiest: Yes.

Mustafa: So as per your concept since god does not exist as he cannot be touched, felt, smelled, and so on.

Athiest: Yes.

Mustafa: can i see your brain?

Athiest: no

Mustafa (facing towards his friends with him): can you see his brain?

Reply of freinds: no

Mustafa: So since i cannot feel, smell, touch, see your brain shall i say you are brainless?

That is a terrible argument for the existence of God, if that was the intent.

The existence of <something> does not need to be proven at a per person basis, meaning not everyone must be satisfied. That is not how the scientific process works in the first place. Never has. To continue with the above example, the conversation occurs between two or more sentient beings. Each man is quite similar to his companions in terms of intelligence, self awareness, capable of processing sensory inputs, and so on...What this mean is that all of us, including the dead, must share similar biology in order for us to communicate with each other. What the scientific process does is to explore samples of this group, preferably the dead, and essentially try to find out what make the human what he/she is. In that exploration, since it was consistent from dead to dead that they all have a thing called a 'brain', and since at one time they were alive and talking to other people, it is only logical that EVERY human being must have that same thing called a 'brain'. In other words, the scientific process is not confined to only what the individual can learn for himself but also about logical deduction, reasonable inferences, or even guesstimates. The scientific process then records what a few have done and challenge the many to disprove what was recorded. So far, no one have managed to dissect a dead person and found out that person has no 'brain'.

Mustafa Mahmood, you get an 'F' in my class.

 

[Backbencher]

Gravity is caused by a body's mass.

arrey baba what i meant was gravitation

 

[HellzHere]

An atheist professor of philosophy speaks to his class on the problem science has with God, The Almighty.

He asks one of his new students to stand and make him understand .....


Prof:

So you believe in God?


Student:

Absolutely, sir.


Prof:
Is God good?

Student:
Sure.

Prof:
Is God all-powerful?

Student:
Yes.

Prof:
My brother died of cancer even though he prayed to God to heal him.

Most of us would attempt to help others who are ill. But God didn't. How is this God good then? Hmm?

(Student is silent.)

Prof:
You can't answer, can you? Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?

Student:
Yes.

Prof:
Is Satan good?

Student:
No.

Prof:
Where does Satan come from?

Student:
From... God.. .

Prof:
That's right. Tell me son, is there evil in this world?

Student:
Yes.

Prof:
Evil is everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything. Correct?

Student:
Yes.

Prof:
So who created evil?

(Student does not answer.)

Prof:
Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things exist in the world, don't they?

Student:
Yes, sir.

Prof:
So, who created them?

(Student has no answer.)

Prof:
Science says you have 5 senses you use to identify and observe the world around you.

Tell me, son...Have you ever seen God?

Student:

No, sir.

Prof:

Tell us if you have ever heard your God?

Student:
No, sir.

Prof:
Have you ever felt your God, tasted your God, smelt your God? Have you ever had any sensory perception of God for that matter?

Student:
No, sir. I'm afraid I haven't.

Prof:
Yet you still believe in Him?

Student:
Yes.

Prof:
According to empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your GOD doesn't exist.

What do you say to that, son?

Student:
Nothing. I only have my faith.

Prof:
Yes. Faith. And that is the problem science has.

Now Student to his Professor,
Is there such a thing as heat?

Prof:
Yes.

Student:
And is there such a thing as cold?

Prof:
Yes.

Student:
No sir. There isn't.

(The lecture theatre becomes very quiet with this turn of events.)

Student:
Sir, you can have lots of heat, even more heat, superheat, mega heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat.

But we don't have anything called cold. We can hit 458 degrees below zero which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that.

There is no such thing as cold . Cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat ...

We cannot measure cold. Heat is energy . Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, its just the absence of it .

(There is pin-drop silence in the lecture theatre.)

Student:
What about darkness, Professor? Is there such a thing as darkness?

Prof:
Yes. What is night if there isn't darkness?

Student :
You're wrong again, sir.
Darkness is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light....But if
you have no light constantly, you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it?
In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?

Prof:
So what is the point you are making, young man?

Student:
Sir, my point is your philosophical premise is flawed.

Prof:
Flawed? Can you explain how?

Student:
Sir, you are working on the premise of duality. You argue there is life and then there is death, a good God and a bad God.
You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure.
Sir, science can't even explain a thought. It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one.
To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing.
Death is not the opposite of life: just the absence of it.

Now tell me, Professor. Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?

Prof:
If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, yes, of course, I do.

Student:
Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?

(The Professor shakes his head with a smile, beginning to realize where the argument is going.)

Student:

Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir?
Are you not a scientist but a preacher? (The class is in uproar.)

Student:
Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the Professor's brain?

(The class breaks out into laughter.)

Student:
Is there anyone here who has ever heard the Professor's brain, felt it, touched or smelt it? No one appears to have done so.
So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, sir.

With all due respect, sir, how do we then trust your lectures, sir?

(The room is silent.. The professor stares at the student, his face unfathomable. )

Prof:
I guess you'll have to take them on faith, son.

Student:

That is it sir... The link between man & God is FAITH . That is all that keeps things moving & alive.


The student was Mohammad Ali Jinnah.

The explanations than student gives don't go down my throat..
Darkness can be experienced is present and we know it.
Cold can be felt.
Brain?Open up a dead person's skull you can see it,X-rays perhaps also?
What kinda argument is this?
But the prof makes sense...if god is good,then how is there so much evil in this world on one hand you have people living at the age of 100+ on the other hand you have infants dying soon after their birth..leaving the parents in dismal.
I don't think today's world has any signs of existence of god.

 

[gambit]

The explanations than student gives don't go down my throat..

There are so many things wrong in that story it would not stand if it actually occurred. More likely it was made up idolize a person, as we see at the end.