Irfan Baloch
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,975
- Reaction score
- 214
- Country
- Location
@Windjammer @OrionHunter
I guess the subject of the thread itself wasn't blasphemous. the military personnel of both countries dont need to be protected like the repute of a Z lister from ShowBiz .
one makes a statement of wiping another country from face of the earth.. (fair enough)
other begs to disagree saying such claim is amateurish (fair enough)
one points towards bigger budget, more fighters and all that as a proof
the other still maintains that this is factually wrong
the house is divided and battle lines are drown and we commit harakari based on our flags.
some invoke the sacredness of the professional forces, other mention the 1000 ruling of Sub continent and more.
I think we can make peace here.
if IAF decides to believe that PAF is a done deal in 4 days and then it can wipe Pakistan from face of the earth then it must have absolute belief in its power of weapons and its users and also must believe that it has enough information about PAF not being able to do much and perish in short time.
this is perfectly fine.
because IAF might not want to share intricate details although it can afford to do so.
if PAF says that IAF claim is not a reality then thats fine too.it would be wise not to disclose its super strategy or weapons usage that it intends to deploy in order to defeat IAF because the issue here is that its health is directly proportional to the health of the Pakistan state (and inversely proportional to Nawaz / Zardari Swiss/ Dubai accounts)
loose tongues sink ships so lets leave the need to know details out and continue with the jingoism and rhetoric (thats what forums are for). just leave out crude ( all that apply) comments.
as far as giving my 2 cents to the subject is concerned. all I can say is that we could shoot down that Indian Foxbat back in the days but we chose not to. and it appears that the mission was exactly that ......to suss out what our air defence command had in its hands back in late 90s. (again I dont have the "link" or photo to prove what i say so take my word for it )
I guess the subject of the thread itself wasn't blasphemous. the military personnel of both countries dont need to be protected like the repute of a Z lister from ShowBiz .
one makes a statement of wiping another country from face of the earth.. (fair enough)
other begs to disagree saying such claim is amateurish (fair enough)
one points towards bigger budget, more fighters and all that as a proof
the other still maintains that this is factually wrong
the house is divided and battle lines are drown and we commit harakari based on our flags.
some invoke the sacredness of the professional forces, other mention the 1000 ruling of Sub continent and more.
I think we can make peace here.
if IAF decides to believe that PAF is a done deal in 4 days and then it can wipe Pakistan from face of the earth then it must have absolute belief in its power of weapons and its users and also must believe that it has enough information about PAF not being able to do much and perish in short time.
this is perfectly fine.
because IAF might not want to share intricate details although it can afford to do so.
if PAF says that IAF claim is not a reality then thats fine too.it would be wise not to disclose its super strategy or weapons usage that it intends to deploy in order to defeat IAF because the issue here is that its health is directly proportional to the health of the Pakistan state (and inversely proportional to Nawaz / Zardari Swiss/ Dubai accounts)
loose tongues sink ships so lets leave the need to know details out and continue with the jingoism and rhetoric (thats what forums are for). just leave out crude ( all that apply) comments.
as far as giving my 2 cents to the subject is concerned. all I can say is that we could shoot down that Indian Foxbat back in the days but we chose not to. and it appears that the mission was exactly that ......to suss out what our air defence command had in its hands back in late 90s. (again I dont have the "link" or photo to prove what i say so take my word for it )
Last edited: