Divide and Conquer? Chinese Navy Starts Playing Nice With U.S.

[TheTruth]

Terrorist nation(s) ? Can you be any more prehensile ?

So what do you call two nations actively involved in genocide, one which was a sanctioned by the entire world for its military occupation of Cambodia? Another in an active war of extermination against Muslim natives in the south of its country?

Keep in mind that both of these reprehensible terrorist nations have conflicting, absurd claims to the SCS. Likewise you ought to look up the definition of prehensile.

 

[Sam.]

Bangladesh with water sharing. Sri Lanka with internal intrigues. Bhutan with attempted Sikkimization. The illegal annexation of Sikkim. The continued violent racial oppression of "Mongoloid" peoples in their homelands.

UN Tribunal Resolves 40-Year-Old Maritime Dispute Between India and Bangladesh - NDTV

If we wanted as bully we would have denied the UN resolution as bangladesh got 19km and we got 6 Km but oh wait teach us who we are.

The illegal annexation of sikkim ,well we have Indians here who live in sikkim so they will answer you better and you can ask tibet guy what they say about tibet as well as Ugyur but oh wait we are the bully.

Yeah we building hydro project with Bhutan and they are quite happy with it but meh we are bullying them to build so we can bully them to use electricity because we are bully.

Also we bully Sri lanka and that's why we support them in UN oh wait doesn't t hat mean they bully us to supporting them but nevermind.

India against sending UN probe team to Sri Lanka - Yahoo News India

India is a bully country and that's the fact because "The Truth" said so

 

[Lord ZeN]

Ask this question to Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Sikkim.
Sorry, Sikkim doesn't exist now. It was annexed by India.

Citizens of Sikkim voted in overwhelming majority (97%) to join India.If u have any doubt ask @Tshering22 our member from Sikkim.

 

[TheTruth]

You only surrendered your claim because you are not strong enough to shove aside a UN ruling. You got to milk their seas for four decades.

Now lets talk about you diverting Bangladeshi waters. The Bhutanese are not "happy" with you treating them like a client state with the threat of annexation looming, always.

Citizens of Sikkim voted in overwhelming majority (97%) to join India.If u have any doubt ask @Tshering22 our member from Sikkim.

But is he racially Sikkimese? I know his views. First off, an illegitimate poll is not representative of anyone - nor is one man. I would probably have less trouble finding a true Sikkimese who despises India but they're probably too afraid to speak their minds.

 

[Lord ZeN]

Ask the Bangladeshi members.

We helped them to gain Independence. Is that intimidation ?

You only surrendered your claim because you are not strong enough to shove aside a UN ruling. You got to milk their seas for four decades.

Now lets talk about you diverting Bangladeshi waters. The Bhutanese are not "happy" with you treating them like a client state with the threat of annexation looming, always.



But is he racially Sikkimese? I know his views. First off, an illegitimate poll is not representative of anyone - nor is one man. I would probably have less trouble finding a true Sikkimese who despises India but they're probably too afraid to speak their minds.

If u cannot accept truth what can anyone say.

 

[kankan326]

Citizens of Sikkim voted in overwhelming majority (97%) to join India.If u have any doubt ask @Tshering22 our member from Sikkim.

Yes, I do have doubt. Except Tarmiel minority, the majority of SL people are Buddhists, not Hindus.

 

[Sam.]

You only surrendered your claim because you are not strong enough to shove aside a UN ruling. You got to milk their seas for four decades.

Now lets talk about you diverting Bangladeshi waters. The Bhutanese are not "happy" with you treating them like a client state with the threat of annexation looming, always.



But is he racially Sikkimese? I know his views. First off, an illegitimate poll is not representative of anyone - nor is one man. I would probably have less trouble finding a true Sikkimese who despises India but they're probably too afraid to speak their minds.

Ahh so we surrendered to Bangladesh as we are weak but but bully are supposed to be strong. If you meant we surrender to UN then why India ask UN to leave from Delhi regarding Kashmir.

India asks UN team on Kashmir to leave Delhi premises| Reuters

Oh yeah you know about Bhutanese and Sikkim people opinion more than themselves and isn't it so obvious

 

[TheTruth]

Bullies don't have to be strong. Some bullies back right off when you give them a bloody lip like China did in 1962.

No, all you need to be a bully is the ability to take advantage of someone's weakness when they are distracted, and the psychopathic intent to do harm to others.

And I get my opinion on Bhutan from Bhutanese. They are disgusted by you.

 

[Aepsilons]

So what do you call two nations actively involved in genocide

Surely you jest.

 

[Sam.]

Bullies don't have to be strong. Some bullies back right off when you give them a bloody lip like China did in 1962.

No, all you need to be a bully is the ability to take advantage of someone's weakness when they are distracted, and the psychopathic intent to do harm to others.

And I get my opinion on Bhutan from Bhutanese. They are disgusted by you.

ahh they tell you in your dreams well good for you but so far you didn't show a single article suggesting your views so you goes to my ignore list.

Good luck and get the brainwashing get going

 

[Battle of Bach Dang River]

However unlike America (or India) China has no intention of using force to dominate or intimidate weak nations.

You mean the Republic of China (Taiwan)?

 

[PlanetWarrior]

Yes, I do have doubt. Except Tarmiel minority, the majority of SL people are Buddhists, not Hindus.

Sikkim is a wayyy different area from Sri Lanka (SL) dude. Get your geography correct

 

[TheTruth]

Surely you jest.

BAJARAKA
Spanish–Moro conflict - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Get educated

 

[ComradeNam]

That is Chinese' nature and characteristic. They bow to the superior and bully the weak.

We Viet are different we are heroic fighting for justice and peace regardless of opponent's characteristic. We get rid of Khmer Rouge a little pawn of China to save million Khmers from genocide. We fought the Yuan Mongol to discourage them further expansion to SEA.

 

[TheTruth]

That is Chinese' nature and characteristic. They bow to the superior and bully the weak.

We Viet are different we are heroic fighting for justice and peace regardless of opponent's characteristic. We get rid of Khmer Rouge a little pawn of China to save million Khmers from genocide. We fought the Yuan Mongol to discourage them further expansion to SEA.

ROFL you shameless liar. You have REPEATEDLY attacked all the weaker states on your periphery and bowed to suck European *** even after China and Japan helped you expel the French. China has NEVER attacked a truly weak state in history that I know of, while it declared war on eight of the world's most powerful countries SIMULTANEOUSLY.

You didn't do jack **** to "save" Cambodia, you simply wanted to occupy them (along with Laos). No one knew at the time what the Khmer Rouge was doing and we still don't.

And you defended against Mongols to save SEA from invasion? ROFL. You "defended" against the Mongols to defend yourselves and immediately proceeded to annex a large part of Champa.

It's China that bravely defends weak nations and is a pacifist and soft to small countries. China has openly defied every single belligerent superpower in history from the Huns to the (true) Turks to the Mongols to the Spanish, British, Japanese, Soviets and America - NOT just to defend her own territory like you cold-blooded, amoral serpents but to protect her allies when she could have gotten off scot-free just by throwing you into the fire.

Good ****ing god you Vietnamese are delusional liars.